光核部分反应截面:系统的不确定性和可靠性

IF 2.7 3区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL
V.V. Varlamov, A.I. Davydov, V.N. Orlin
{"title":"光核部分反应截面:系统的不确定性和可靠性","authors":"V.V. Varlamov,&nbsp;A.I. Davydov,&nbsp;V.N. Orlin","doi":"10.1016/j.adt.2024.101697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The well-known significant systematic disagreements between cross sections of partial photoneutron reactions <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>γ</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>1</mn><mi>n</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> and (<em>γ</em>, 2<em>n</em>) obtained in various experiments majority of which have been carried out at Livermore (USA) and Saclay (France) were analyzed using the objective physical criteria of data reliability. It was found that experimental data for more than 50 nuclei from <sup>51</sup>V to <sup>209</sup>Bi in general do not meet those criteria and therefore are more or less unreliable. The experimental-theoretical method based on the Combined PhotoNuclear Reaction Model (CPNRM) was used to evaluate partial reaction cross sections that meet the reliability criteria. It was shown using the analysis in detail of differences between evaluated and experimental cross sections that the major sources of large systematic uncertainties in obtained cross sections are certain shortcomings of experimental neutron multiplicity sorting method have been used for indirect separation of partial reactions. It was shown that the newly evaluated cross sections of partial photoneutron reactions differ significantly (at least noticeably) from the ones obtained using the method of neutron multiplicity sorting but agree with experimental data obtained by alternative methods used for reliable direct separation of partial reactions. The consolidated review of many problems with partial photoneutron reaction experimental data reliability and some ways to solve ones are presented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55580,"journal":{"name":"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 101697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photonuclear partial reaction cross sections: Systematic uncertainties and reliability\",\"authors\":\"V.V. Varlamov,&nbsp;A.I. Davydov,&nbsp;V.N. Orlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adt.2024.101697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The well-known significant systematic disagreements between cross sections of partial photoneutron reactions <span><math><mrow><mo>(</mo><mrow><mi>γ</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>1</mn><mi>n</mi></mrow><mo>)</mo></mrow></math></span> and (<em>γ</em>, 2<em>n</em>) obtained in various experiments majority of which have been carried out at Livermore (USA) and Saclay (France) were analyzed using the objective physical criteria of data reliability. It was found that experimental data for more than 50 nuclei from <sup>51</sup>V to <sup>209</sup>Bi in general do not meet those criteria and therefore are more or less unreliable. The experimental-theoretical method based on the Combined PhotoNuclear Reaction Model (CPNRM) was used to evaluate partial reaction cross sections that meet the reliability criteria. It was shown using the analysis in detail of differences between evaluated and experimental cross sections that the major sources of large systematic uncertainties in obtained cross sections are certain shortcomings of experimental neutron multiplicity sorting method have been used for indirect separation of partial reactions. It was shown that the newly evaluated cross sections of partial photoneutron reactions differ significantly (at least noticeably) from the ones obtained using the method of neutron multiplicity sorting but agree with experimental data obtained by alternative methods used for reliable direct separation of partial reactions. The consolidated review of many problems with partial photoneutron reaction experimental data reliability and some ways to solve ones are presented.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101697\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X24000627\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X24000627","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, ATOMIC, MOLECULAR & CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在美国利弗莫尔(Livermore)和法国萨克莱(Saclay)进行的各种实验中获得的部分光子中子反应(γ,1n)和(γ, 2n)截面之间众所周知的显著系统差异,使用数据可靠性的客观物理标准进行了分析。结果发现,从51V到209Bi的50多个原子核的实验数据一般不符合这些标准,因此或多或少不可靠。采用基于组合光核反应模型(CPNRM)的实验-理论方法对满足可靠性标准的部分反应截面进行了评估。通过对计算截面与实验截面差异的详细分析表明,实验中子多重分选法用于间接分离部分反应的某些缺点是所得截面系统不确定度较大的主要来源。结果表明,新计算的部分光子中子反应截面与用中子多重分选方法得到的截面有显著差异,但与用可靠的直接分离部分反应的替代方法得到的实验数据一致。本文综合评述了部分光子中子反应实验数据可靠性的许多问题,并提出了解决这些问题的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Photonuclear partial reaction cross sections: Systematic uncertainties and reliability
The well-known significant systematic disagreements between cross sections of partial photoneutron reactions (γ,1n) and (γ, 2n) obtained in various experiments majority of which have been carried out at Livermore (USA) and Saclay (France) were analyzed using the objective physical criteria of data reliability. It was found that experimental data for more than 50 nuclei from 51V to 209Bi in general do not meet those criteria and therefore are more or less unreliable. The experimental-theoretical method based on the Combined PhotoNuclear Reaction Model (CPNRM) was used to evaluate partial reaction cross sections that meet the reliability criteria. It was shown using the analysis in detail of differences between evaluated and experimental cross sections that the major sources of large systematic uncertainties in obtained cross sections are certain shortcomings of experimental neutron multiplicity sorting method have been used for indirect separation of partial reactions. It was shown that the newly evaluated cross sections of partial photoneutron reactions differ significantly (at least noticeably) from the ones obtained using the method of neutron multiplicity sorting but agree with experimental data obtained by alternative methods used for reliable direct separation of partial reactions. The consolidated review of many problems with partial photoneutron reaction experimental data reliability and some ways to solve ones are presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables
Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables presents compilations of experimental and theoretical information in atomic physics, nuclear physics, and closely related fields. The journal is devoted to the publication of tables and graphs of general usefulness to researchers in both basic and applied areas. Extensive ... click here for full Aims & Scope Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables presents compilations of experimental and theoretical information in atomic physics, nuclear physics, and closely related fields. The journal is devoted to the publication of tables and graphs of general usefulness to researchers in both basic and applied areas. Extensive and comprehensive compilations of experimental and theoretical results are featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信