经皮加压钢板与股骨颈系统治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的生物力学评价。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Xiaoping Xie, Songqi Bi, Qingxu Song, Qiong Zhang, Zhixing Yan, Xiaoyang Zhou, Tiecheng Yu
{"title":"经皮加压钢板与股骨颈系统治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的生物力学评价。","authors":"Xiaoping Xie, Songqi Bi, Qingxu Song, Qiong Zhang, Zhixing Yan, Xiaoyang Zhou, Tiecheng Yu","doi":"10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.</p>","PeriodicalId":48603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","volume":"25 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous compression plate and femoral neck system in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoping Xie, Songqi Bi, Qingxu Song, Qiong Zhang, Zhixing Yan, Xiaoyang Zhou, Tiecheng Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607197/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10195-024-00792-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:保韦尔斯III型股骨颈骨折的最佳治疗方法仍有争议。我们的目的是比较三种倒置空心加压螺钉(ICCS)、股骨颈系统(FNS)和经皮加压钢板(PCCP)的生物力学性能,以确定哪种方法对不稳定股骨颈骨折具有更好的稳定性。材料与方法:采用有限元分析和人工骨模型建立Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折模型。根据各自的内固定组件分为ICCS、FNS和PCCP组。在有限元分析中,模型承受了沿股骨颈轴的垂直轴向载荷(2100 N)和扭转力(10 N × mm)。分析了Z轴碎片位移、内固定体位移和von Mises应力(VMS)分布等主要结果。此外,人工骨分别承受逐渐增加的垂直轴向压力和角度为2°、4°和6°的扭转力矩。记录股骨头垂直位移和所需扭矩值。结果:有限元分析显示,在单腿站立载荷下,ICCS、FNS和PCCP的最大z轴碎片位移分别为5.060 mm、4.028 mm和2.796 mm。ICCS内固定最大位移为4.545 mm, FNS为3.047 mm, PCCP为2.559 mm。ICCS的峰值VMS值为512.21 MPa, FNS为242.86 MPa, PCCP为413.85 MPa。随着人工骨垂直载荷的增加,ICCS、FNS和PCCP组的平均垂直轴向刚度分别为244.86±2.84 N/mm、415.03±27.10 N/mm和529.98±23.08 N/mm。在扭转力矩测试中,PCCP组在2°、4°和6°的扭矩值明显高于FNS和ICCS,而FNS和ICCS之间无显著差异(P < 0.05)。结论:有限元分析和人工骨模型显示PCCP在固定Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折时具有最佳的压缩和旋转稳定性,其次是FNS,最后是ICCS。FNS与ICCS在人工骨中的旋转阻力无显著差异。证据等级5级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biomechanical evaluation of percutaneous compression plate and femoral neck system in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Background: The optimal treatment for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures remains contentious. We aim to compare the biomechanical properties of three inverted cannulated compression screw (ICCS), femoral neck system (FNS), and percutaneous compression plate (PCCP) to determine which offers superior stability for unstable femoral neck fractures.

Materials and methods: Finite element analysis and artificial bone models were used to establish Pauwels III femoral neck fracture models. They were divided into ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups based on respective internal fixation assemblies. The models were subjected to vertical axial loads (2100 N) and torsional forces (10 N × mm) along the femoral neck axis in the finite element analysis. The primary outcomes such as the Z axis fragmentary displacements, as well as displacements and the von Mises stress (VMS) distributions of internal fixations, were analyzed. Additionally, the artificial bones were subjected to progressively increasing vertical axial pressures and torsional moments at angles of 2°, 4°, and 6°, respectively. The vertical displacements of femoral heads and the required torque values were recorded.

Results: Finite element analysis revealed that under single-leg stance loading, the maximum Z-axis fragmentary displacements were 5.060 mm for ICCS, 4.028 mm for FNS, and 2.796 mm for PCCP. The maximum displacements of internal fixations were 4.545 mm for ICCS, 3.047 mm for FNS, and 2.559 mm for PCCP. Peak VMS values were 512.21 MPa for ICCS, 242.86 MPa for FNS, and 413.85 MPa for PCCP. Under increasing vertical loads applied to the artificial bones, the average vertical axial stiffness for the ICCS, FNS, and PCCP groups were 244.86 ± 2.84 N/mm, 415.03 ± 27.10 N/mm, and 529.98 ± 23.08 N/mm. For the torsional moment tests, the PCCP group demonstrated significantly higher torque values at 2°, 4°, and 6° compared with FNS and ICCS, with no significant difference between FNS and ICCS (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Finite element analysis and artificial bone models indicated that PCCP offers the best compressive and rotational stability for fixing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, followed by FNS and then ICCS. No significant difference in rotational resistance was observed between FNS and ICCS in synthetic bones. Level of Evidence Level 5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, the official open access peer-reviewed journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, publishes original papers reporting basic or clinical research in the field of orthopaedic and traumatologic surgery, as well as systematic reviews, brief communications, case reports and letters to the Editor. Narrative instructional reviews and commentaries to original articles may be commissioned by Editors from eminent colleagues. The Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology aims to be an international forum for the communication and exchange of ideas concerning the various aspects of orthopaedics and musculoskeletal trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信