日本基于深度学习的商用肺结节检测在肺癌筛查低剂量CT图像上的性能的外部验证。

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-30 DOI:10.1007/s11604-024-01704-2
Wataru Fukumoto, Yuki Yamashita, Ikuo Kawashita, Toru Higaki, Asako Sakahara, Yuko Nakamura, Yoshikazu Awaya, Kazuo Awai
{"title":"日本基于深度学习的商用肺结节检测在肺癌筛查低剂量CT图像上的性能的外部验证。","authors":"Wataru Fukumoto, Yuki Yamashita, Ikuo Kawashita, Toru Higaki, Asako Sakahara, Yuko Nakamura, Yoshikazu Awaya, Kazuo Awai","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01704-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for lung nodule detection have been developed to assist radiologists. However, external validation of its performance on low-dose CT (LDCT) images is insufficient. We examined the performance of the commercially available deep-learning-based lung nodule detection (DL-LND) using LDCT images at Japanese lung cancer screening (LCS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Included were 43 patients with suspected lung cancer on LDCT images and pathologically confirmed lung cancer. The reference standard for nodules whose diameter exceeded 4 mm was set by a radiologist who referred to the reports of two other radiologists reading the LDCT images. After we applied commercially available DL-LND to the LDCT images, the radiologist reviewed all nodules detected by DL-LND. When he failed to identify an existing nodule, it was also included in the reference standard. To validate the performance of DL-LND, the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer, the positive-predictive value (PPV) for lung nodules, and the mean number of false-positive (FP) nodules per CT scan were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiologist detected 97 nodules including 43 lung cancers and missed 3 solid nodules detected by DL-LND. A total of 100 nodules was included in the reference standard. DL-LND detected 396 nodules including 40 lung cancers. The sensitivity for the 100 nodules was 96.0%; the PPV was 24.2% (96/396). The mean number of FP nodules per CT scan was 7.0; sensitivity for lung cancer was 93.0% (40/43). DL-LND missed three lung cancers; 2 of these were atypical pulmonary cysts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We externally verified that the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer by DL-LND was very high. However, its low PPV and the increased FP nodules remains a serious drawback of DL-LND.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"634-640"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953200/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of the performance of commercially available deep-learning-based lung nodule detection on low-dose CT images for lung cancer screening in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Wataru Fukumoto, Yuki Yamashita, Ikuo Kawashita, Toru Higaki, Asako Sakahara, Yuko Nakamura, Yoshikazu Awaya, Kazuo Awai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-024-01704-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for lung nodule detection have been developed to assist radiologists. However, external validation of its performance on low-dose CT (LDCT) images is insufficient. We examined the performance of the commercially available deep-learning-based lung nodule detection (DL-LND) using LDCT images at Japanese lung cancer screening (LCS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Included were 43 patients with suspected lung cancer on LDCT images and pathologically confirmed lung cancer. The reference standard for nodules whose diameter exceeded 4 mm was set by a radiologist who referred to the reports of two other radiologists reading the LDCT images. After we applied commercially available DL-LND to the LDCT images, the radiologist reviewed all nodules detected by DL-LND. When he failed to identify an existing nodule, it was also included in the reference standard. To validate the performance of DL-LND, the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer, the positive-predictive value (PPV) for lung nodules, and the mean number of false-positive (FP) nodules per CT scan were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The radiologist detected 97 nodules including 43 lung cancers and missed 3 solid nodules detected by DL-LND. A total of 100 nodules was included in the reference standard. DL-LND detected 396 nodules including 40 lung cancers. The sensitivity for the 100 nodules was 96.0%; the PPV was 24.2% (96/396). The mean number of FP nodules per CT scan was 7.0; sensitivity for lung cancer was 93.0% (40/43). DL-LND missed three lung cancers; 2 of these were atypical pulmonary cysts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We externally verified that the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer by DL-LND was very high. However, its low PPV and the increased FP nodules remains a serious drawback of DL-LND.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"634-640\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11953200/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01704-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01704-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:开发用于肺结节检测的人工智能(AI)算法来辅助放射科医生。然而,对其在低剂量CT (LDCT)图像上的性能的外部验证还不够。我们在日本肺癌筛查(LCS)中使用LDCT图像检查了市售的基于深度学习的肺结节检测(DL-LND)的性能。材料与方法:纳入43例LDCT影像疑似肺癌,经病理证实的肺癌患者。直径超过4毫米的结节的参考标准是由一名放射科医生参考另外两名放射科医生阅读LDCT图像的报告而制定的。我们将市售DL-LND应用于LDCT图像后,放射科医生检查了DL-LND检测到的所有结节。当他无法识别现有的结节时,也将其纳入参考标准。为了验证DL-LND的性能,记录肺结节和肺癌的敏感性、肺结节的阳性预测值(PPV)和每次CT扫描的假阳性(FP)结节的平均数量。结果:放射科医师共检出97个结节,其中肺癌43个,漏诊3个实性结节。参考标准共纳入100个结节。DL-LND检出396例结节,其中肺癌40例。100个结节的敏感性为96.0%;PPV为24.2%(96/396)。平均每次CT扫描FP结节数为7.0个;肺癌的敏感性为93.0%(40/43)。DL-LND遗漏3例肺癌;其中2例为非典型肺囊肿。结论:我们从外部验证了DL-LND对肺结节和肺癌的敏感性很高。然而,它的低PPV和增加的FP结节仍然是DL-LND的一个严重缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External validation of the performance of commercially available deep-learning-based lung nodule detection on low-dose CT images for lung cancer screening in Japan.

Purpose: Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for lung nodule detection have been developed to assist radiologists. However, external validation of its performance on low-dose CT (LDCT) images is insufficient. We examined the performance of the commercially available deep-learning-based lung nodule detection (DL-LND) using LDCT images at Japanese lung cancer screening (LCS).

Materials and methods: Included were 43 patients with suspected lung cancer on LDCT images and pathologically confirmed lung cancer. The reference standard for nodules whose diameter exceeded 4 mm was set by a radiologist who referred to the reports of two other radiologists reading the LDCT images. After we applied commercially available DL-LND to the LDCT images, the radiologist reviewed all nodules detected by DL-LND. When he failed to identify an existing nodule, it was also included in the reference standard. To validate the performance of DL-LND, the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer, the positive-predictive value (PPV) for lung nodules, and the mean number of false-positive (FP) nodules per CT scan were recorded.

Results: The radiologist detected 97 nodules including 43 lung cancers and missed 3 solid nodules detected by DL-LND. A total of 100 nodules was included in the reference standard. DL-LND detected 396 nodules including 40 lung cancers. The sensitivity for the 100 nodules was 96.0%; the PPV was 24.2% (96/396). The mean number of FP nodules per CT scan was 7.0; sensitivity for lung cancer was 93.0% (40/43). DL-LND missed three lung cancers; 2 of these were atypical pulmonary cysts.

Conclusion: We externally verified that the sensitivity for lung nodules and lung cancer by DL-LND was very high. However, its low PPV and the increased FP nodules remains a serious drawback of DL-LND.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信