Donabedian三联征减少吸入器错误的方法。

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Frontiers in medical technology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2024.1494089
Dorothy May Isip Cruz, Manjush Karthika, Ashraf Alzaabi
{"title":"Donabedian三联征减少吸入器错误的方法。","authors":"Dorothy May Isip Cruz, Manjush Karthika, Ashraf Alzaabi","doi":"10.3389/fmedt.2024.1494089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inhaler errors inversely affect the outcome of respiratory diseases. Inhaler devices, such as the metered-dose inhalers (MDI) and dry powder inhalers (DPI), are commonly used in treating respiratory diseases like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and incorrect use of these devices can result in suboptimal treatment outcomes, increased probabilities of hospitalizations or admissions, and poorer quality of life. Patient related factors to inhaler errors include age, cognitive and physical abilities, education, language barriers, and preferences. Device-related factors such as inhaler design and operational complexity can also lead to errors. Finally, factors related to healthcare professionals (HCP) such as competency, level of knowledge in disease and inhaler device and availability to educate patients, can play a role in inhaler error. Quality management is a potential solution to this problem. Quality improvement strategies towards addressing inhaler misuse can increase patient satisfaction and improve patient outcomes. Donabedian's triad, which includes structure, process, and outcome can be utilized in developing a framework for reducing inhaler errors. Institutional solutions are more towards the structural and process changes in the triad, such as HCP training, checklists on training efficacy, provision of action plans, and availability of staff to educate and train patients. Patient-centered solutions focus more on process and outcome domains, such as improvement in lung functions, patient education, re-assessment and re-education of inhaler techniques, and adherence to treatment regimen. By focusing on structural and process domains, the quality of care can be enhanced, resulting in improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94015,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in medical technology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1494089"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603695/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An approach to reduce inhaler errors using Donabedian's triad.\",\"authors\":\"Dorothy May Isip Cruz, Manjush Karthika, Ashraf Alzaabi\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmedt.2024.1494089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inhaler errors inversely affect the outcome of respiratory diseases. Inhaler devices, such as the metered-dose inhalers (MDI) and dry powder inhalers (DPI), are commonly used in treating respiratory diseases like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and incorrect use of these devices can result in suboptimal treatment outcomes, increased probabilities of hospitalizations or admissions, and poorer quality of life. Patient related factors to inhaler errors include age, cognitive and physical abilities, education, language barriers, and preferences. Device-related factors such as inhaler design and operational complexity can also lead to errors. Finally, factors related to healthcare professionals (HCP) such as competency, level of knowledge in disease and inhaler device and availability to educate patients, can play a role in inhaler error. Quality management is a potential solution to this problem. Quality improvement strategies towards addressing inhaler misuse can increase patient satisfaction and improve patient outcomes. Donabedian's triad, which includes structure, process, and outcome can be utilized in developing a framework for reducing inhaler errors. Institutional solutions are more towards the structural and process changes in the triad, such as HCP training, checklists on training efficacy, provision of action plans, and availability of staff to educate and train patients. Patient-centered solutions focus more on process and outcome domains, such as improvement in lung functions, patient education, re-assessment and re-education of inhaler techniques, and adherence to treatment regimen. By focusing on structural and process domains, the quality of care can be enhanced, resulting in improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in medical technology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"1494089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11603695/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in medical technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1494089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in medical technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmedt.2024.1494089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

吸入器错误对呼吸系统疾病的结果有相反的影响。吸入器装置,如计量吸入器(MDI)和干粉吸入器(DPI),通常用于治疗哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)等呼吸系统疾病,不正确使用这些装置可能导致治疗结果不理想,增加住院或入院的可能性,并降低生活质量。吸入器错误的患者相关因素包括年龄、认知和身体能力、教育程度、语言障碍和偏好。吸入器设计和操作复杂性等设备相关因素也可能导致错误。最后,与卫生保健专业人员(HCP)相关的因素,如能力、疾病和吸入器装置的知识水平以及对患者进行教育的可用性,都可能在吸入器错误中发挥作用。质量管理是这个问题的潜在解决方案。针对吸入器滥用问题的质量改进策略可以提高患者满意度并改善患者预后。Donabedian的三合一包括结构、过程和结果,可用于制定减少吸入器错误的框架。制度性解决方案更多地是针对三合一的结构和流程变化,例如HCP培训、培训效果检查表、提供行动计划以及是否有工作人员对患者进行教育和培训。以患者为中心的解决方案更多地关注过程和结果领域,如肺功能的改善、患者教育、吸入器技术的重新评估和再教育,以及对治疗方案的依从性。通过关注结构和过程领域,可以提高护理质量,从而改善结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An approach to reduce inhaler errors using Donabedian's triad.

Inhaler errors inversely affect the outcome of respiratory diseases. Inhaler devices, such as the metered-dose inhalers (MDI) and dry powder inhalers (DPI), are commonly used in treating respiratory diseases like asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and incorrect use of these devices can result in suboptimal treatment outcomes, increased probabilities of hospitalizations or admissions, and poorer quality of life. Patient related factors to inhaler errors include age, cognitive and physical abilities, education, language barriers, and preferences. Device-related factors such as inhaler design and operational complexity can also lead to errors. Finally, factors related to healthcare professionals (HCP) such as competency, level of knowledge in disease and inhaler device and availability to educate patients, can play a role in inhaler error. Quality management is a potential solution to this problem. Quality improvement strategies towards addressing inhaler misuse can increase patient satisfaction and improve patient outcomes. Donabedian's triad, which includes structure, process, and outcome can be utilized in developing a framework for reducing inhaler errors. Institutional solutions are more towards the structural and process changes in the triad, such as HCP training, checklists on training efficacy, provision of action plans, and availability of staff to educate and train patients. Patient-centered solutions focus more on process and outcome domains, such as improvement in lung functions, patient education, re-assessment and re-education of inhaler techniques, and adherence to treatment regimen. By focusing on structural and process domains, the quality of care can be enhanced, resulting in improved outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信