中国老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱的可改变危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Research in Nursing & Health Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-29 DOI:10.1002/nur.22428
Wenhui Qiu, Yixiong Zhang
{"title":"中国老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱的可改变危险因素:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wenhui Qiu, Yixiong Zhang","doi":"10.1002/nur.22428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis clarifying potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older Chinese persons with diabetes. We conducted a comprehensive search across four English and four Chinese databases, spanning from 1980 to May 2024. The aim was to identify studies that investigate potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata16.0. Out of the 237 records identified, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were consequently included for analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of cognitive frailty among older patients with diabetes was 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.177-0.270, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.92%). Depression (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.19-4.62, I<sup>2</sup> = 79.6%), HbA1c (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.85, I<sup>2</sup> = 41.5%) and malnutrition (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.58-10.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.0%) were significantly associated with cognitive frailty in this population. Regular exercise (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 87.3%) and higher education (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.58, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 69.7%) are identified as protective factors against cognitive frailty. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that interventions targeting depression, HbA1c level, malnutrition, exercise and education can effectively reduce the risk of cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54492,"journal":{"name":"Research in Nursing & Health","volume":" ","pages":"73-84"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modifiable Risk Factors for Cognitive Frailty in Older Chinese Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wenhui Qiu, Yixiong Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nur.22428\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis clarifying potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older Chinese persons with diabetes. We conducted a comprehensive search across four English and four Chinese databases, spanning from 1980 to May 2024. The aim was to identify studies that investigate potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata16.0. Out of the 237 records identified, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were consequently included for analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of cognitive frailty among older patients with diabetes was 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.177-0.270, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.92%). Depression (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.19-4.62, I<sup>2</sup> = 79.6%), HbA1c (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.85, I<sup>2</sup> = 41.5%) and malnutrition (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.58-10.34, I<sup>2</sup> = 95.0%) were significantly associated with cognitive frailty in this population. Regular exercise (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 87.3%) and higher education (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.58, p < 0.01, I<sup>2</sup> = 69.7%) are identified as protective factors against cognitive frailty. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that interventions targeting depression, HbA1c level, malnutrition, exercise and education can effectively reduce the risk of cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"73-84\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Nursing & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22428\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Nursing & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.22428","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,阐明中国老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱的潜在可改变危险因素。我们对四个英文和四个中文数据库进行了全面的检索,时间跨度从1980年到2024年5月。目的是确定研究老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱的潜在可改变风险因素的研究。meta分析采用Stata16.0进行。在确定的237份记录中,有19项研究符合纳入标准,因此被纳入分析。meta分析结果显示,老年糖尿病患者的认知衰弱患病率为22.2%(95%可信区间[CI]: 0.177-0.270, I2 = 93.92%)。在该人群中,抑郁(OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.19-4.62, I2 = 79.6%)、糖化血红蛋白(OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.85, I2 = 41.5%)和营养不良(OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.58-10.34, I2 = 95.0%)与认知衰弱显著相关。经常运动(OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84, p 2 = 87.3%)和高等教育(OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.58, p 2 = 69.7%)被认为是预防认知衰弱的保护因素。本系统综述和荟萃分析表明,针对抑郁、HbA1c水平、营养不良、运动和教育的干预措施可以有效降低老年糖尿病患者认知衰弱的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modifiable Risk Factors for Cognitive Frailty in Older Chinese Patients With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis clarifying potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older Chinese persons with diabetes. We conducted a comprehensive search across four English and four Chinese databases, spanning from 1980 to May 2024. The aim was to identify studies that investigate potential modifiable risk factors for cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata16.0. Out of the 237 records identified, 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were consequently included for analysis. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the prevalence of cognitive frailty among older patients with diabetes was 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.177-0.270, I2 = 93.92%). Depression (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 2.19-4.62, I2 = 79.6%), HbA1c (OR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.66-2.85, I2 = 41.5%) and malnutrition (OR = 4.04, 95% CI: 1.58-10.34, I2 = 95.0%) were significantly associated with cognitive frailty in this population. Regular exercise (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.84, p < 0.01, I2 = 87.3%) and higher education (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.58, p < 0.01, I2 = 69.7%) are identified as protective factors against cognitive frailty. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates that interventions targeting depression, HbA1c level, malnutrition, exercise and education can effectively reduce the risk of cognitive frailty in older patients with diabetes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Research in Nursing & Health ( RINAH ) is a peer-reviewed general research journal devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will inform the practice of nursing and other health disciplines. The editors invite reports of research describing problems and testing interventions related to health phenomena, health care and self-care, clinical organization and administration; and the testing of research findings in practice. Research protocols are considered if funded in a peer-reviewed process by an agency external to the authors’ home institution and if the work is in progress. Papers on research methods and techniques are appropriate if they go beyond what is already generally available in the literature and include description of successful use of the method. Theory papers are accepted if each proposition is supported by research evidence. Systematic reviews of the literature are reviewed if PRISMA guidelines are followed. Letters to the editor commenting on published articles are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信