covid - 19大流行后放射科住院医师读出最佳实践:机构需求评估和初步指南。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sophia R. O’Brien MD, MSEd, Christine E. Edmonds MD, Jillian W. Lazor MD, Susan Shamimi-Noori MD, MSEd, Mary Scanlon MD, Austin R. Pantel MD, MSTR, Scott Simpson DO, MSEd
{"title":"covid - 19大流行后放射科住院医师读出最佳实践:机构需求评估和初步指南。","authors":"Sophia R. O’Brien MD, MSEd,&nbsp;Christine E. Edmonds MD,&nbsp;Jillian W. Lazor MD,&nbsp;Susan Shamimi-Noori MD, MSEd,&nbsp;Mary Scanlon MD,&nbsp;Austin R. Pantel MD, MSTR,&nbsp;Scott Simpson DO, MSEd","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Radiology resident readout practices were adapted during the COVID pandemic, with several institutions transitioning to virtual and asynchronous readouts. Some pandemic-era practices persist today, with unclear effects on resident education. We developed institutional Readout Best Practices and assessed implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A voluntary, anonymous needs assessment survey was emailed to radiology residents in June 2023 and an informal faculty needs assessment was performed. Results informed development of a Readout Best Practices guide, shared with trainees and faculty in July 2023. A voluntary, anonymous, faculty pre-implementation survey was sent in July 2023, followed by resident and faculty post-implementation surveys in November 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our institutional needs assessment revealed that residents and faculty preferred a combination of live in-person readouts and asynchronous readouts based on resident year and specific rotation. Notably, residents desired more in-person readouts than they were receiving. Following implementation of Readout Best Practices, there was no change in readout methods reported by residents or faculty; however, 56% of faculty reported making changes to their educational practices and 50% of residents who had read the Best Practices guide adopted changes on service to improve their learning. Faculty reported implementation was limited by high volumes, staffing, and workflow.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite no significant changes in reported readout style, faculty and residents reported practice changes following implementation of Readout Best Practices, suggesting that effects on teaching and learning at the individual level were not captured by our survey. This study identified challenges in balancing volumes, education, and wellness, and the data support discussion of both educational and clinical workflow optimization. Future studies are warranted to determine the status of post-pandemic radiology readouts beyond our institution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 1743-1751"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-COVID Pandemic Radiology Resident Readout Best Practices: An Institutional Needs Assessment and Initial Guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Sophia R. O’Brien MD, MSEd,&nbsp;Christine E. Edmonds MD,&nbsp;Jillian W. Lazor MD,&nbsp;Susan Shamimi-Noori MD, MSEd,&nbsp;Mary Scanlon MD,&nbsp;Austin R. Pantel MD, MSTR,&nbsp;Scott Simpson DO, MSEd\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Radiology resident readout practices were adapted during the COVID pandemic, with several institutions transitioning to virtual and asynchronous readouts. Some pandemic-era practices persist today, with unclear effects on resident education. We developed institutional Readout Best Practices and assessed implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A voluntary, anonymous needs assessment survey was emailed to radiology residents in June 2023 and an informal faculty needs assessment was performed. Results informed development of a Readout Best Practices guide, shared with trainees and faculty in July 2023. A voluntary, anonymous, faculty pre-implementation survey was sent in July 2023, followed by resident and faculty post-implementation surveys in November 2023.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our institutional needs assessment revealed that residents and faculty preferred a combination of live in-person readouts and asynchronous readouts based on resident year and specific rotation. Notably, residents desired more in-person readouts than they were receiving. Following implementation of Readout Best Practices, there was no change in readout methods reported by residents or faculty; however, 56% of faculty reported making changes to their educational practices and 50% of residents who had read the Best Practices guide adopted changes on service to improve their learning. Faculty reported implementation was limited by high volumes, staffing, and workflow.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite no significant changes in reported readout style, faculty and residents reported practice changes following implementation of Readout Best Practices, suggesting that effects on teaching and learning at the individual level were not captured by our survey. This study identified challenges in balancing volumes, education, and wellness, and the data support discussion of both educational and clinical workflow optimization. Future studies are warranted to determine the status of post-pandemic radiology readouts beyond our institution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1743-1751\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224008456\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224008456","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由和目标:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,一些机构调整了放射科住院医师读出做法,过渡到虚拟和异步读出。一些大流行时期的做法至今仍在继续,对居民教育的影响尚不清楚。我们制定了机构Readout最佳实践并评估了实施情况。材料和方法:于2023年6月通过电子邮件向放射科住院医师发送了一份自愿的匿名需求评估调查,并进行了非正式的教师需求评估。结果为Readout最佳实践指南的制定提供了信息,该指南于2023年7月与学员和教师分享。在2023年7月进行了一项自愿的、匿名的教师实施前调查,随后在2023年11月进行了居民和教师实施后调查。结果:我们的机构需求评估显示,住院医生和教职员工更喜欢现场现场读数和基于住院医生年份和特定轮转的异步读数的组合。值得注意的是,居民们希望获得比他们收到的更多的现场读数。实施读数最佳实践后,住院医师或教师报告的读数方法没有变化;然而,56%的教师报告说他们改变了他们的教育实践,50%的读过最佳实践指南的住院医生在服务上做出了改变,以改善他们的学习。教师报告的实施受到高容量、人员配置和工作流程的限制。结论:尽管报告的阅读风格没有显著变化,但教师和住院医师报告了阅读最佳实践实施后的实践变化,这表明我们的调查没有捕捉到对个人层面的教学和学习的影响。该研究确定了平衡数量、教育和健康方面的挑战,并支持了对教育和临床工作流程优化的讨论。未来的研究有必要确定我们机构以外的大流行后放射学读数的状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-COVID Pandemic Radiology Resident Readout Best Practices: An Institutional Needs Assessment and Initial Guidelines

Rationale and Objectives

Radiology resident readout practices were adapted during the COVID pandemic, with several institutions transitioning to virtual and asynchronous readouts. Some pandemic-era practices persist today, with unclear effects on resident education. We developed institutional Readout Best Practices and assessed implementation.

Materials and Methods

A voluntary, anonymous needs assessment survey was emailed to radiology residents in June 2023 and an informal faculty needs assessment was performed. Results informed development of a Readout Best Practices guide, shared with trainees and faculty in July 2023. A voluntary, anonymous, faculty pre-implementation survey was sent in July 2023, followed by resident and faculty post-implementation surveys in November 2023.

Results

Our institutional needs assessment revealed that residents and faculty preferred a combination of live in-person readouts and asynchronous readouts based on resident year and specific rotation. Notably, residents desired more in-person readouts than they were receiving. Following implementation of Readout Best Practices, there was no change in readout methods reported by residents or faculty; however, 56% of faculty reported making changes to their educational practices and 50% of residents who had read the Best Practices guide adopted changes on service to improve their learning. Faculty reported implementation was limited by high volumes, staffing, and workflow.

Conclusion

Despite no significant changes in reported readout style, faculty and residents reported practice changes following implementation of Readout Best Practices, suggesting that effects on teaching and learning at the individual level were not captured by our survey. This study identified challenges in balancing volumes, education, and wellness, and the data support discussion of both educational and clinical workflow optimization. Future studies are warranted to determine the status of post-pandemic radiology readouts beyond our institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信