Ana Gabriela Santana Cuoghi, Ana Maria Ferreira Paccola, Roger Frossard Pagotto, Douglas Manuel Carrapeiro Prina, Monica Paschoal Nogueira
{"title":"腓骨偏瘫伴半表皮成形术复发外翻膝畸形的治疗。","authors":"Ana Gabriela Santana Cuoghi, Ana Maria Ferreira Paccola, Roger Frossard Pagotto, Douglas Manuel Carrapeiro Prina, Monica Paschoal Nogueira","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to analyze the treatment of recurrent valgus knee in fibular hemimelia patients with hemiepiphysiodesis and define associated variables for deformity relapse. Sixteen consecutive patients with fibular hemimelia treated with hemiepiphysiodesis (57 physis) were compared to 21 physis of idiopathic cases, in terms of magnitude, speed, and time of correction. Correction of valgus deformity was successfully achieved in all cases. In the fibular hemimelia group, children 4 years and younger had a bigger magnitude of correction than older ones (11° versus 6.9°) and greater speed (1° versus 0.6°), with statistical significance (P = 0.018 and P = 0.009, respectively), while time for correction was similar among these groups (11.6 months versus 12.3 months). Femoral distal physis corrected faster than proximal tibial physis (10.8 months versus 16.8 months), with statistical significance (P = 0.032). Thirty-three physis (57.9%) were isolated and 24 (42.1%) were tibia and femur. We found no statistical difference between the two groups regarding time for correction, magnitude, or speed (P = 0.526, P = 0.910, P = 0.803, respectively). Relapse was observed in 49 physis (86%) of the fibular hemimelia patients. These had a mean age of 5.5 years versus 3.9 years for those without a relapse, with statistical significance (P = 0.204). Relapse occurred after 2 years of the first procedure. Recurrent valgus deformity in fibular hemimelia can be successfully treated with single or multiple hemiepiphysiodesis with tension band plates in skeletally immature patients in an effective and gradual manner. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment of relapse valgus knee deformity in fibular hemimelia with hemiepiphysiodesis.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Gabriela Santana Cuoghi, Ana Maria Ferreira Paccola, Roger Frossard Pagotto, Douglas Manuel Carrapeiro Prina, Monica Paschoal Nogueira\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to analyze the treatment of recurrent valgus knee in fibular hemimelia patients with hemiepiphysiodesis and define associated variables for deformity relapse. Sixteen consecutive patients with fibular hemimelia treated with hemiepiphysiodesis (57 physis) were compared to 21 physis of idiopathic cases, in terms of magnitude, speed, and time of correction. Correction of valgus deformity was successfully achieved in all cases. In the fibular hemimelia group, children 4 years and younger had a bigger magnitude of correction than older ones (11° versus 6.9°) and greater speed (1° versus 0.6°), with statistical significance (P = 0.018 and P = 0.009, respectively), while time for correction was similar among these groups (11.6 months versus 12.3 months). Femoral distal physis corrected faster than proximal tibial physis (10.8 months versus 16.8 months), with statistical significance (P = 0.032). Thirty-three physis (57.9%) were isolated and 24 (42.1%) were tibia and femur. We found no statistical difference between the two groups regarding time for correction, magnitude, or speed (P = 0.526, P = 0.910, P = 0.803, respectively). Relapse was observed in 49 physis (86%) of the fibular hemimelia patients. These had a mean age of 5.5 years versus 3.9 years for those without a relapse, with statistical significance (P = 0.204). Relapse occurred after 2 years of the first procedure. Recurrent valgus deformity in fibular hemimelia can be successfully treated with single or multiple hemiepiphysiodesis with tension band plates in skeletally immature patients in an effective and gradual manner. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001217\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001217","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是分析伴有半表皮发育的腓骨偏瘫患者复发性膝外翻的治疗方法,并确定畸形复发的相关变量。在矫正的幅度、速度和时间方面,将16例连续腓骨偏瘫患者(57例)与21例特发性病例(57例)进行比较。所有病例均成功矫正外翻畸形。在腓骨偏瘫组中,4岁及以下儿童的矫正幅度大于年长儿童(11°比6.9°),矫正速度大于年长儿童(1°比0.6°),差异均有统计学意义(P = 0.018和P = 0.009),两组矫正时间相似(11.6个月比12.3个月)。股骨远端骨骺端矫正速度快于胫骨近端骨骺端(10.8个月比16.8个月),差异有统计学意义(P = 0.032)。分离体33例(57.9%),胫骨和股骨24例(42.1%)。我们发现两组在校正时间、震级或速度方面无统计学差异(P = 0.526, P = 0.910, P = 0.803)。49例(86%)腓骨偏瘫患者复发。这些患者的平均年龄为5.5岁,而无复发患者的平均年龄为3.9岁,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.204)。复发发生在第一次手术后2年。腓骨偏瘫复发性外翻畸形可采用张力带钢板单次或多次半表皮成形术,有效且渐进地治疗。证据等级:III级,治疗性研究。
Treatment of relapse valgus knee deformity in fibular hemimelia with hemiepiphysiodesis.
The objective of this study was to analyze the treatment of recurrent valgus knee in fibular hemimelia patients with hemiepiphysiodesis and define associated variables for deformity relapse. Sixteen consecutive patients with fibular hemimelia treated with hemiepiphysiodesis (57 physis) were compared to 21 physis of idiopathic cases, in terms of magnitude, speed, and time of correction. Correction of valgus deformity was successfully achieved in all cases. In the fibular hemimelia group, children 4 years and younger had a bigger magnitude of correction than older ones (11° versus 6.9°) and greater speed (1° versus 0.6°), with statistical significance (P = 0.018 and P = 0.009, respectively), while time for correction was similar among these groups (11.6 months versus 12.3 months). Femoral distal physis corrected faster than proximal tibial physis (10.8 months versus 16.8 months), with statistical significance (P = 0.032). Thirty-three physis (57.9%) were isolated and 24 (42.1%) were tibia and femur. We found no statistical difference between the two groups regarding time for correction, magnitude, or speed (P = 0.526, P = 0.910, P = 0.803, respectively). Relapse was observed in 49 physis (86%) of the fibular hemimelia patients. These had a mean age of 5.5 years versus 3.9 years for those without a relapse, with statistical significance (P = 0.204). Relapse occurred after 2 years of the first procedure. Recurrent valgus deformity in fibular hemimelia can be successfully treated with single or multiple hemiepiphysiodesis with tension band plates in skeletally immature patients in an effective and gradual manner. Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.
期刊介绍:
The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders.
It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies).
Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.