体重超过3 kg的儿童使用第二代Microcuff®小儿气管内管的比率:回顾性审计。

Die Anaesthesiologie Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s00101-024-01486-2
Ilka Schmidt-Deubig, Michael Kemper, Pedro D Wendel-Garcia, Markus Weiss, Jörg Thomas, Christian Peter Both, Achim Schmitz
{"title":"体重超过3 kg的儿童使用第二代Microcuff®小儿气管内管的比率:回顾性审计。","authors":"Ilka Schmidt-Deubig, Michael Kemper, Pedro D Wendel-Garcia, Markus Weiss, Jörg Thomas, Christian Peter Both, Achim Schmitz","doi":"10.1007/s00101-024-01486-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cuffed endotracheal tubes (cETT) pose the potential advantage of an infrequent need for reintubation in pediatric patients compared to uncuffed tubes. The aim of this study was to investigate tube exchange rates using second generation Microcuff® pediatric endotracheal tubes (PET) with an adapted sizing recommendation in a large single institution cohort of children and to identify potential variables associated with an elevated risk of tube exchange.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient data obtained from the electronic patient data management system of the Department of Anesthesia, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, were retrospectively assessed for demographic and anthropometric information, size of the internal tube diameter used for positive pressure ventilation and divergence from the size recommendation chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 14,188 children younger than 16 years (median 5.3 years) and weighing at least 3 kg who underwent oral or nasal tracheal intubation using second generation Microcuff® PET between 2009 and 2015 were included. Of 13,219 oral tracheal intubations 12,049 (84.9%) were performed according to the manufacturer's size recommendation and 1170 with divergent endotracheal tubes. The odds ratio (OR) of oral reintubation was 0.13% (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.22%) for cases using the manufacture's size recommendation correctly and 22.74% (95% confidence interval 20.42-25.23%) for patients intubated with a not recommended tube (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the second generation Microcuff® PETs can be reliably used with low tube exchange rates across the entire pediatric age range when the tube size is selected according to the manufacturer's size recommendation chart. Adherence to the manufacturer's tube size recommendation is urgently advised.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":"829-836"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exchange rates of second generation Microcuff® pediatric endotracheal tubes in children weighing more than 3 kg : A retrospective audit.\",\"authors\":\"Ilka Schmidt-Deubig, Michael Kemper, Pedro D Wendel-Garcia, Markus Weiss, Jörg Thomas, Christian Peter Both, Achim Schmitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00101-024-01486-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cuffed endotracheal tubes (cETT) pose the potential advantage of an infrequent need for reintubation in pediatric patients compared to uncuffed tubes. The aim of this study was to investigate tube exchange rates using second generation Microcuff® pediatric endotracheal tubes (PET) with an adapted sizing recommendation in a large single institution cohort of children and to identify potential variables associated with an elevated risk of tube exchange.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patient data obtained from the electronic patient data management system of the Department of Anesthesia, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, were retrospectively assessed for demographic and anthropometric information, size of the internal tube diameter used for positive pressure ventilation and divergence from the size recommendation chart.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 14,188 children younger than 16 years (median 5.3 years) and weighing at least 3 kg who underwent oral or nasal tracheal intubation using second generation Microcuff® PET between 2009 and 2015 were included. Of 13,219 oral tracheal intubations 12,049 (84.9%) were performed according to the manufacturer's size recommendation and 1170 with divergent endotracheal tubes. The odds ratio (OR) of oral reintubation was 0.13% (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.22%) for cases using the manufacture's size recommendation correctly and 22.74% (95% confidence interval 20.42-25.23%) for patients intubated with a not recommended tube (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the second generation Microcuff® PETs can be reliably used with low tube exchange rates across the entire pediatric age range when the tube size is selected according to the manufacturer's size recommendation chart. Adherence to the manufacturer's tube size recommendation is urgently advised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"829-836\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615024/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Die Anaesthesiologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01486-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01486-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与非套管气管插管相比,套管气管插管在儿科患者中具有较少需要再插管的潜在优势。本研究的目的是在一个大型的单一机构儿童队列中调查使用第二代Microcuff®儿童气管内管(PET)的换管率,并确定与换管风险升高相关的潜在变量。方法:回顾性分析从瑞士苏黎世大学儿童医院麻醉科电子患者资料管理系统获取的患者资料,包括人口统计学和人体测量学信息、用于正压通气的内管径大小以及与尺寸推荐表的差异。结果:数据来自14,188名年龄小于16岁(中位5.3岁),体重至少3 kg的儿童,他们在2009年至2015年期间使用第二代Microcuff®PET进行了口腔或鼻腔气管插管。在13219例口腔气管插管中,有12049例(84.9%)按照制造商推荐的尺寸进行插管,1170例采用气管导管发散。正确使用制造商推荐尺寸的患者口服再插管的优势比(OR)为0.13%(95%可信区间0.08-0.22%),而使用非推荐尺寸插管的患者的优势比(OR)为22.74%(95%可信区间20.42-25.23%)(p )。这些发现表明,第二代Microcuff®pet在整个儿科年龄范围内,当根据制造商的尺寸推荐表选择试管尺寸时,可以可靠地以低试管交换率使用。迫切建议遵守制造商的管尺寸建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exchange rates of second generation Microcuff® pediatric endotracheal tubes in children weighing more than 3 kg : A retrospective audit.

Background: Cuffed endotracheal tubes (cETT) pose the potential advantage of an infrequent need for reintubation in pediatric patients compared to uncuffed tubes. The aim of this study was to investigate tube exchange rates using second generation Microcuff® pediatric endotracheal tubes (PET) with an adapted sizing recommendation in a large single institution cohort of children and to identify potential variables associated with an elevated risk of tube exchange.

Methods: Patient data obtained from the electronic patient data management system of the Department of Anesthesia, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, were retrospectively assessed for demographic and anthropometric information, size of the internal tube diameter used for positive pressure ventilation and divergence from the size recommendation chart.

Results: Data from 14,188 children younger than 16 years (median 5.3 years) and weighing at least 3 kg who underwent oral or nasal tracheal intubation using second generation Microcuff® PET between 2009 and 2015 were included. Of 13,219 oral tracheal intubations 12,049 (84.9%) were performed according to the manufacturer's size recommendation and 1170 with divergent endotracheal tubes. The odds ratio (OR) of oral reintubation was 0.13% (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.22%) for cases using the manufacture's size recommendation correctly and 22.74% (95% confidence interval 20.42-25.23%) for patients intubated with a not recommended tube (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: These findings indicate that the second generation Microcuff® PETs can be reliably used with low tube exchange rates across the entire pediatric age range when the tube size is selected according to the manufacturer's size recommendation chart. Adherence to the manufacturer's tube size recommendation is urgently advised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信