钆渗漏入眼结构作为中风的标志:WAKE-UP试验的回顾性分析。

IF 5.8 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Anke Wouters, Tim Van Assche, Lauranne Scheldeman, Bastian Cheng, Claus Ziegler Simonsen, Martin Ebinger, Norbert Nighoghossian, Keith W Muir, Matthias Endres, Jochen B Fiebach, Salvador Pedraza, Christian Gerloff, Vincent Thijs, Götz Thomalla, Robin Lemmens
{"title":"钆渗漏入眼结构作为中风的标志:WAKE-UP试验的回顾性分析。","authors":"Anke Wouters, Tim Van Assche, Lauranne Scheldeman, Bastian Cheng, Claus Ziegler Simonsen, Martin Ebinger, Norbert Nighoghossian, Keith W Muir, Matthias Endres, Jochen B Fiebach, Salvador Pedraza, Christian Gerloff, Vincent Thijs, Götz Thomalla, Robin Lemmens","doi":"10.1177/23969873241301276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blood-brain barrier disruption in acute ischemic stroke is a well described phenomenon associated with hemorrhagic complications. The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) represents gadolinium leakage in the cerebrospinal fluid. Gadolinium leakage into ocular structures (GLOS) might represent a dysfunction of the blood-ocular barrier. We aimed to investigate the presence of GLOS in the WAKE-UP trial and its association with HARM, hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Randomized patients from the WAKE-UP trial who underwent dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging at baseline and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging at both baseline and follow-up, were included. We studied the association between GLOS with baseline and outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We were able to analyze the data of 192/503 (38%) randomized WAKE-UP patients. GLOS was detected in 56 (29%) cases, four times more frequently than HARM (7%). GLOS positive patients were older (73 vs 65 years; <i>p</i> < 0.01), had a lower glomerular infiltration rate (GFR 79.5 vs 87.2 mL/min; <i>p</i> = 0.01), higher white matter hyperintensity volume (15.0 vs 9.9 mL; <i>p</i> < 0.01), less often presented with a large vessel occlusion (27% vs 44%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and HARM was more often observed (9/56 vs 4/136; <i>p</i> = 0.01). In multivariable analysis the presence of GLOS was not associated with HT nor poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 3-6).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>GLOS is a relatively common finding in acute ischemic stroke patients and is associated with older age, worse renal function, increased white matter hyperintensity burden and HARM but not with HT or functional outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":46821,"journal":{"name":"European Stroke Journal","volume":" ","pages":"23969873241301276"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gadolinium leakage into ocular structures as a marker in stroke: A retrospective analysis of the WAKE-UP trial.\",\"authors\":\"Anke Wouters, Tim Van Assche, Lauranne Scheldeman, Bastian Cheng, Claus Ziegler Simonsen, Martin Ebinger, Norbert Nighoghossian, Keith W Muir, Matthias Endres, Jochen B Fiebach, Salvador Pedraza, Christian Gerloff, Vincent Thijs, Götz Thomalla, Robin Lemmens\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23969873241301276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Blood-brain barrier disruption in acute ischemic stroke is a well described phenomenon associated with hemorrhagic complications. The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) represents gadolinium leakage in the cerebrospinal fluid. Gadolinium leakage into ocular structures (GLOS) might represent a dysfunction of the blood-ocular barrier. We aimed to investigate the presence of GLOS in the WAKE-UP trial and its association with HARM, hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and functional outcome.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Randomized patients from the WAKE-UP trial who underwent dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging at baseline and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging at both baseline and follow-up, were included. We studied the association between GLOS with baseline and outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We were able to analyze the data of 192/503 (38%) randomized WAKE-UP patients. GLOS was detected in 56 (29%) cases, four times more frequently than HARM (7%). GLOS positive patients were older (73 vs 65 years; <i>p</i> < 0.01), had a lower glomerular infiltration rate (GFR 79.5 vs 87.2 mL/min; <i>p</i> = 0.01), higher white matter hyperintensity volume (15.0 vs 9.9 mL; <i>p</i> < 0.01), less often presented with a large vessel occlusion (27% vs 44%; <i>p</i> = 0.02) and HARM was more often observed (9/56 vs 4/136; <i>p</i> = 0.01). In multivariable analysis the presence of GLOS was not associated with HT nor poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 3-6).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>GLOS is a relatively common finding in acute ischemic stroke patients and is associated with older age, worse renal function, increased white matter hyperintensity burden and HARM but not with HT or functional outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46821,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"23969873241301276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11607709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Stroke Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241301276\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Stroke Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23969873241301276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:急性缺血性卒中的血脑屏障破坏是一种与出血性并发症相关的良好现象。高强度急性再灌注标志物(HARM)表示脑脊液中钆渗漏。钆渗漏入眼结构(GLOS)可能是血眼屏障功能障碍的表现。我们的目的是研究在WAKE-UP试验中GLOS的存在及其与HARM、出血性转化(HT)和功能结局的关系。患者和方法:从wake -起床试验中随机抽取患者,在基线和随访期间分别接受动态敏感性对比灌注加权成像和液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)成像。我们研究了GLOS与基线和结局变量之间的关系。结果:我们能够分析192/503(38%)随机觉醒患者的数据。56例(29%)病例中检出GLOS,是HARM(7%)的4倍。GLOS阳性患者年龄较大(73岁vs 65岁;p p = 0.01),白质高密度体积增大(15.0 vs 9.9 mL;p p = 0.02),并且更常观察到HARM (9/56 vs 4/136;p = 0.01)。在多变量分析中,GLOS的存在与HT和不良的功能预后无关(改良Rankin量表3-6)。讨论和结论:GLOS在急性缺血性卒中患者中比较常见,与年龄较大、肾功能恶化、白质高负荷增加和HARM相关,但与HT或功能结局无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gadolinium leakage into ocular structures as a marker in stroke: A retrospective analysis of the WAKE-UP trial.

Introduction: Blood-brain barrier disruption in acute ischemic stroke is a well described phenomenon associated with hemorrhagic complications. The hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) represents gadolinium leakage in the cerebrospinal fluid. Gadolinium leakage into ocular structures (GLOS) might represent a dysfunction of the blood-ocular barrier. We aimed to investigate the presence of GLOS in the WAKE-UP trial and its association with HARM, hemorrhagic transformation (HT) and functional outcome.

Patients and methods: Randomized patients from the WAKE-UP trial who underwent dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging at baseline and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging at both baseline and follow-up, were included. We studied the association between GLOS with baseline and outcome variables.

Results: We were able to analyze the data of 192/503 (38%) randomized WAKE-UP patients. GLOS was detected in 56 (29%) cases, four times more frequently than HARM (7%). GLOS positive patients were older (73 vs 65 years; p < 0.01), had a lower glomerular infiltration rate (GFR 79.5 vs 87.2 mL/min; p = 0.01), higher white matter hyperintensity volume (15.0 vs 9.9 mL; p < 0.01), less often presented with a large vessel occlusion (27% vs 44%; p = 0.02) and HARM was more often observed (9/56 vs 4/136; p = 0.01). In multivariable analysis the presence of GLOS was not associated with HT nor poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale 3-6).

Discussion and conclusion: GLOS is a relatively common finding in acute ischemic stroke patients and is associated with older age, worse renal function, increased white matter hyperintensity burden and HARM but not with HT or functional outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.60%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Launched in 2016 the European Stroke Journal (ESJ) is the official journal of the European Stroke Organisation (ESO), a professional non-profit organization with over 1,400 individual members, and affiliations to numerous related national and international societies. ESJ covers clinical stroke research from all fields, including clinical trials, epidemiology, primary and secondary prevention, diagnosis, acute and post-acute management, guidelines, translation of experimental findings into clinical practice, rehabilitation, organisation of stroke care, and societal impact. It is open to authors from all relevant medical and health professions. Article types include review articles, original research, protocols, guidelines, editorials and letters to the Editor. Through ESJ, authors and researchers have gained a new platform for the rapid and professional publication of peer reviewed scientific material of the highest standards; publication in ESJ is highly competitive. The journal and its editorial team has developed excellent cooperation with sister organisations such as the World Stroke Organisation and the International Journal of Stroke, and the American Heart Organization/American Stroke Association and the journal Stroke. ESJ is fully peer-reviewed and is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Issues are published 4 times a year (March, June, September and December) and articles are published OnlineFirst prior to issue publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信