研究中的多样性、社区参与和共同设计:快速回顾。

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Nagina Khan, Lily Keck, Claudia Sykes, Cassidy Rowden, Julia Simister, Stephen Fenlon, Edyta Mccallum, Madeline Bell, David Whiting, Claire Shelton, Gary Wells, Richard Giles, Jane Howard, Stephen Peckham
{"title":"研究中的多样性、社区参与和共同设计:快速回顾。","authors":"Nagina Khan, Lily Keck, Claudia Sykes, Cassidy Rowden, Julia Simister, Stephen Fenlon, Edyta Mccallum, Madeline Bell, David Whiting, Claire Shelton, Gary Wells, Richard Giles, Jane Howard, Stephen Peckham","doi":"10.1136/leader-2024-001046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is increasing recognition in the field of health and social care research that community-engaged methods should include patients and the public throughout the research process. Therefore, individuals from all backgrounds should be involved in the research. We explored the public and patient engagement experience in research and how researchers and community groups can work together to make the research process more inclusive and sustainable. We carried out a rapid review and we present three themes from our results as a narrative summary. We found that partnerships and peer support was important for individuals, and it helped them to understand their role and the expectations of stakeholders. Also, using inclusive environments for diverse communities to participate helped individuals to access research training in their communities enabling them to co-create and co-design with facilitators and their community together. Trust was an important factor for diverse community participation in research and was linked to past experiences of taking part in research. We also found that partnerships, innovative methods of information sharing and context of the individual were important facilitators of inclusion. Analysis also indicated that the design of the studies and recruitment approaches such as using flyers, word of mouth, attending health fairs and partnering with nonprofit community, led to an increase in diverse population partcipation in research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diversity, community engagement and co-design in research: a rapid review.\",\"authors\":\"Nagina Khan, Lily Keck, Claudia Sykes, Cassidy Rowden, Julia Simister, Stephen Fenlon, Edyta Mccallum, Madeline Bell, David Whiting, Claire Shelton, Gary Wells, Richard Giles, Jane Howard, Stephen Peckham\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/leader-2024-001046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is increasing recognition in the field of health and social care research that community-engaged methods should include patients and the public throughout the research process. Therefore, individuals from all backgrounds should be involved in the research. We explored the public and patient engagement experience in research and how researchers and community groups can work together to make the research process more inclusive and sustainable. We carried out a rapid review and we present three themes from our results as a narrative summary. We found that partnerships and peer support was important for individuals, and it helped them to understand their role and the expectations of stakeholders. Also, using inclusive environments for diverse communities to participate helped individuals to access research training in their communities enabling them to co-create and co-design with facilitators and their community together. Trust was an important factor for diverse community participation in research and was linked to past experiences of taking part in research. We also found that partnerships, innovative methods of information sharing and context of the individual were important facilitators of inclusion. Analysis also indicated that the design of the studies and recruitment approaches such as using flyers, word of mouth, attending health fairs and partnering with nonprofit community, led to an increase in diverse population partcipation in research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Leader\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在保健和社会保健研究领域,人们日益认识到,社区参与的方法应在整个研究过程中包括病人和公众。因此,所有背景的人都应该参与到研究中来。我们探索了公众和患者参与研究的经验,以及研究人员和社区团体如何共同努力,使研究过程更具包容性和可持续性。我们进行了快速审查,并从我们的结果中提出了三个主题作为叙述摘要。我们发现伙伴关系和同伴支持对个人来说很重要,这有助于他们了解自己的角色和利益相关者的期望。此外,使用包容的环境让不同的社区参与,有助于个人在他们的社区获得研究培训,使他们能够与辅导员和他们的社区一起共同创造和共同设计。信任是不同社区参与研究的一个重要因素,与过去参与研究的经验有关。我们还发现,伙伴关系、创新的信息共享方法和个人背景都是促进包容的重要因素。分析还表明,研究的设计和招聘方法,如使用传单、口口相传、参加卫生展览会和与非营利社区合作,导致不同人群参与研究的人数增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diversity, community engagement and co-design in research: a rapid review.

There is increasing recognition in the field of health and social care research that community-engaged methods should include patients and the public throughout the research process. Therefore, individuals from all backgrounds should be involved in the research. We explored the public and patient engagement experience in research and how researchers and community groups can work together to make the research process more inclusive and sustainable. We carried out a rapid review and we present three themes from our results as a narrative summary. We found that partnerships and peer support was important for individuals, and it helped them to understand their role and the expectations of stakeholders. Also, using inclusive environments for diverse communities to participate helped individuals to access research training in their communities enabling them to co-create and co-design with facilitators and their community together. Trust was an important factor for diverse community participation in research and was linked to past experiences of taking part in research. We also found that partnerships, innovative methods of information sharing and context of the individual were important facilitators of inclusion. Analysis also indicated that the design of the studies and recruitment approaches such as using flyers, word of mouth, attending health fairs and partnering with nonprofit community, led to an increase in diverse population partcipation in research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信