加拿大四家医疗机构中患者自愿自我披露的土著身份:多地点定性案例研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Mandi Gray, Samara Wessel, Richard T Oster, Grant Bruno, Chyloe Healy, Rebecca Rich, Shayla Scott Claringbold, Kienan Williams, Rita Henderson
{"title":"加拿大四家医疗机构中患者自愿自我披露的土著身份:多地点定性案例研究。","authors":"Mandi Gray, Samara Wessel, Richard T Oster, Grant Bruno, Chyloe Healy, Rebecca Rich, Shayla Scott Claringbold, Kienan Williams, Rita Henderson","doi":"10.1177/13558196241300856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The lack of Indigenous health care data in Canada makes it challenging to plan health care services and inform Indigenous leadership on the health care needs of their respective Nations and communities. Several Canadian health care organizations have implemented a voluntary Indigenous identifier of patients within their electronic medical records. This study examines facilitators and barriers to implementing such a voluntary self-reported Indigenous identifier, from the perspective of key stakeholders who work at four Canadian health providers where an Indigenous identifier has been implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The four Canadian sites comprise three hospitals and one health authority. At each site, key stakeholders participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded. Relevant documents that were publicly available or provided by each site were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were four primary findings. First, for the introduction of an Indigenous identifier to be successful there must be pre-existing strong and trusting relationships between Indigenous communities and health care organizations. Second, health care organizations must provide training for those who ask clientele to self-identify as Indigenous, to overcome issues such as any patient backlash. Third, for the relationship between Indigenous people and health organizations to flourish, data governance must be Indigenous-led. Finally, the collection of Indigenous identifier data can enhance Indigenous health care services and health care service planning and delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the ongoing distrust of government and health care services among Indigenous peoples and communities, special considerations are required prior to the implementation of an Indigenous identifier. Of primary importance is how health care organizations can contribute to Indigenous data governance and minimize potential harms associated with the collection of such data. The findings of this study can be used to guide other health care sites and Indigenous leaders aspiring for more robust health data by implementing voluntary Indigenous identity data collection.</p>","PeriodicalId":15953,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","volume":" ","pages":"13558196241300856"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Voluntary self-disclosed Indigenous identity of patients in four Canadian health care settings: A multiple-site qualitative case study.\",\"authors\":\"Mandi Gray, Samara Wessel, Richard T Oster, Grant Bruno, Chyloe Healy, Rebecca Rich, Shayla Scott Claringbold, Kienan Williams, Rita Henderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13558196241300856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The lack of Indigenous health care data in Canada makes it challenging to plan health care services and inform Indigenous leadership on the health care needs of their respective Nations and communities. Several Canadian health care organizations have implemented a voluntary Indigenous identifier of patients within their electronic medical records. This study examines facilitators and barriers to implementing such a voluntary self-reported Indigenous identifier, from the perspective of key stakeholders who work at four Canadian health providers where an Indigenous identifier has been implemented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The four Canadian sites comprise three hospitals and one health authority. At each site, key stakeholders participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded. Relevant documents that were publicly available or provided by each site were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were four primary findings. First, for the introduction of an Indigenous identifier to be successful there must be pre-existing strong and trusting relationships between Indigenous communities and health care organizations. Second, health care organizations must provide training for those who ask clientele to self-identify as Indigenous, to overcome issues such as any patient backlash. Third, for the relationship between Indigenous people and health organizations to flourish, data governance must be Indigenous-led. Finally, the collection of Indigenous identifier data can enhance Indigenous health care services and health care service planning and delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to the ongoing distrust of government and health care services among Indigenous peoples and communities, special considerations are required prior to the implementation of an Indigenous identifier. Of primary importance is how health care organizations can contribute to Indigenous data governance and minimize potential harms associated with the collection of such data. The findings of this study can be used to guide other health care sites and Indigenous leaders aspiring for more robust health data by implementing voluntary Indigenous identity data collection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13558196241300856\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241300856\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Services Research & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13558196241300856","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:加拿大缺乏土著保健数据,因此很难规划保健服务并向土著领导人通报各自国家和社区的保健需求。一些加拿大保健组织在其电子医疗记录中实施了自愿的土著患者标识符。本研究从在四家已实施土著标识符的加拿大保健机构工作的主要利益攸关方的角度,考察了实施这种自愿自我报告的土著标识符的促进因素和障碍。方法:四个加拿大站点包括三家医院和一个卫生当局。在每个站点,关键利益相关者参加了半结构化的定性访谈。采访记录和编码。审查了每个站点公开提供或提供的相关文件。结果:有四个主要发现。首先,要成功地采用土著身份标识,土著社区和保健组织之间必须预先建立牢固和信任的关系。其次,医疗机构必须为那些要求客户自我认同为土著居民的人提供培训,以克服诸如患者反弹之类的问题。第三,要使土著人民与卫生组织之间的关系蓬勃发展,数据治理必须由土著人民主导。最后,收集土著标识符数据可以加强土著保健服务以及保健服务的规划和提供。结论:由于土著人民和社区对政府和保健服务的持续不信任,在实施土著标识符之前需要特别考虑。最重要的是,卫生保健组织如何为土著数据治理作出贡献,并尽量减少与收集此类数据有关的潜在危害。本研究结果可用于指导其他卫生保健网站和土著领导人通过实施自愿土著身份数据收集来获得更可靠的健康数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Voluntary self-disclosed Indigenous identity of patients in four Canadian health care settings: A multiple-site qualitative case study.

Objectives: The lack of Indigenous health care data in Canada makes it challenging to plan health care services and inform Indigenous leadership on the health care needs of their respective Nations and communities. Several Canadian health care organizations have implemented a voluntary Indigenous identifier of patients within their electronic medical records. This study examines facilitators and barriers to implementing such a voluntary self-reported Indigenous identifier, from the perspective of key stakeholders who work at four Canadian health providers where an Indigenous identifier has been implemented.

Methods: The four Canadian sites comprise three hospitals and one health authority. At each site, key stakeholders participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Interviews were transcribed and coded. Relevant documents that were publicly available or provided by each site were reviewed.

Results: There were four primary findings. First, for the introduction of an Indigenous identifier to be successful there must be pre-existing strong and trusting relationships between Indigenous communities and health care organizations. Second, health care organizations must provide training for those who ask clientele to self-identify as Indigenous, to overcome issues such as any patient backlash. Third, for the relationship between Indigenous people and health organizations to flourish, data governance must be Indigenous-led. Finally, the collection of Indigenous identifier data can enhance Indigenous health care services and health care service planning and delivery.

Conclusions: Due to the ongoing distrust of government and health care services among Indigenous peoples and communities, special considerations are required prior to the implementation of an Indigenous identifier. Of primary importance is how health care organizations can contribute to Indigenous data governance and minimize potential harms associated with the collection of such data. The findings of this study can be used to guide other health care sites and Indigenous leaders aspiring for more robust health data by implementing voluntary Indigenous identity data collection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Journal of Health Services Research & Policy provides a unique opportunity to explore the ideas, policies and decisions shaping health services throughout the world. Edited and peer-reviewed by experts in the field and with a high academic standard and multidisciplinary approach, readers will gain a greater understanding of the current issues in healthcare policy and research. The journal"s strong international editorial advisory board also ensures that readers obtain a truly global and insightful perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信