处方药与医疗器械的交叉:两类新兴医疗技术的评估和筹资挑战。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Caroline Rodrigues, Rui Fu, Turjoy Ghose, Emre Yurga, Eric Nauenberg
{"title":"处方药与医疗器械的交叉:两类新兴医疗技术的评估和筹资挑战。","authors":"Caroline Rodrigues, Rui Fu, Turjoy Ghose, Emre Yurga, Eric Nauenberg","doi":"10.1017/S0266462324004768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Health technology assessments (HTAs) are policy analysis frameworks contributing to the approval, reimbursement, and rollout of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. New innovations in health technologies expose gaps in reimbursement and implementation guidelines. We defined two types of emerging health technologies: (1) therapeutic innovations, such as drug-device combination products or nondrug alternatives to prescription drugs and (2) disruptive health innovations such as novel surgeries and gene replacement therapies. We aimed to determine delineated definitions for these categories through a comprehensive review of HTA guidelines across 20 nations. Utilizing databases such as International Network of Agencies for HTA, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, and European Medical Agency, we identified products falling within these categories. Real-world case studies highlighted the inadequacies stemming from the absence of clear definitions and proposed solutions to enhance current HTA guidelines. These shortcomings apply at the state or provincial level in addition to national jurisdictions as existing funding structures and silos fail to accommodate the unique attributes of these technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14467,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"e1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The intersection of prescription drugs and medical devices: the evaluation and funding challenges of two categories of emerging health technologies.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Rodrigues, Rui Fu, Turjoy Ghose, Emre Yurga, Eric Nauenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266462324004768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Health technology assessments (HTAs) are policy analysis frameworks contributing to the approval, reimbursement, and rollout of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. New innovations in health technologies expose gaps in reimbursement and implementation guidelines. We defined two types of emerging health technologies: (1) therapeutic innovations, such as drug-device combination products or nondrug alternatives to prescription drugs and (2) disruptive health innovations such as novel surgeries and gene replacement therapies. We aimed to determine delineated definitions for these categories through a comprehensive review of HTA guidelines across 20 nations. Utilizing databases such as International Network of Agencies for HTA, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, and European Medical Agency, we identified products falling within these categories. Real-world case studies highlighted the inadequacies stemming from the absence of clear definitions and proposed solutions to enhance current HTA guidelines. These shortcomings apply at the state or provincial level in addition to national jurisdictions as existing funding structures and silos fail to accommodate the unique attributes of these technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324004768\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462324004768","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生技术评估是有助于批准、报销和推广生物技术和药品的政策分析框架。卫生技术的新创新暴露了报销和执行准则方面的差距。我们定义了两种类型的新兴健康技术:(1)治疗性创新,如药物装置组合产品或处方药的非药物替代品;(2)破坏性健康创新,如新型手术和基因替代疗法。我们的目的是通过对20个国家的HTA指南的全面审查来确定这些类别的界定。利用国际HTA机构网络、国际药物经济学和结果研究学会和欧洲医疗机构等数据库,我们确定了属于这些类别的产品。现实世界的案例研究强调了由于缺乏明确的定义和建议的解决方案而产生的不足,以加强目前的卫生管理局指南。除了国家管辖范围外,这些缺点还适用于州或省一级,因为现有的资金结构和筒仓无法适应这些技术的独特属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The intersection of prescription drugs and medical devices: the evaluation and funding challenges of two categories of emerging health technologies.

Health technology assessments (HTAs) are policy analysis frameworks contributing to the approval, reimbursement, and rollout of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. New innovations in health technologies expose gaps in reimbursement and implementation guidelines. We defined two types of emerging health technologies: (1) therapeutic innovations, such as drug-device combination products or nondrug alternatives to prescription drugs and (2) disruptive health innovations such as novel surgeries and gene replacement therapies. We aimed to determine delineated definitions for these categories through a comprehensive review of HTA guidelines across 20 nations. Utilizing databases such as International Network of Agencies for HTA, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, and European Medical Agency, we identified products falling within these categories. Real-world case studies highlighted the inadequacies stemming from the absence of clear definitions and proposed solutions to enhance current HTA guidelines. These shortcomings apply at the state or provincial level in addition to national jurisdictions as existing funding structures and silos fail to accommodate the unique attributes of these technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.60%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care serves as a forum for the wide range of health policy makers and professionals interested in the economic, social, ethical, medical and public health implications of health technology. It covers the development, evaluation, diffusion and use of health technology, as well as its impact on the organization and management of health care systems and public health. In addition to general essays and research reports, regular columns on technology assessment reports and thematic sections are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信