肾功能衰竭的退伍军人和非退伍军人的渐进式血液透析过渡。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Connie M Rhee, Csaba P Kovesdy, Mark Unruh, Susan Crowley, David Geller, David S Goldfarb, Jeffrey Kraut, Mandana Rastegar, Ian R Rifkin, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
{"title":"肾功能衰竭的退伍军人和非退伍军人的渐进式血液透析过渡。","authors":"Connie M Rhee, Csaba P Kovesdy, Mark Unruh, Susan Crowley, David Geller, David S Goldfarb, Jeffrey Kraut, Mandana Rastegar, Ian R Rifkin, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh","doi":"10.1097/MNH.0000000000001040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Initiation of hemodialysis treatment with a thrice-weekly prescription is currently the standard of care irrespective of patients' residual kidney function (RKF), comorbidities, and preferences.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Each year ∼12 000 Veterans with advanced kidney disease progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis and comprise greater than 10% of the US incident ESKD population. Dialysis is costly and is associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and high mortality risk, especially in the first year of treatment. Evidence suggests an incremental dialysis transition using twice-weekly hemodialysis provides various benefits, including more dialysis-free time, longer RKF preservation, less vascular access damage, and lower patient burden. Pragmatic studies are needed to inform the efficacy and safety of incremental hemodialysis as a personalized dialysis regimen, and could inform its consideration as a conservation strategy during times of supply shortages. Broadly implementing twice-weekly hemodialysis could also potentially allow more Veterans to receive care within VA-based dialysis units. The VA IncHVets Trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of twice-weekly incremental vs. thrice-weekly hemodialysis among Veterans transitioning to ESKD.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Further research is needed to determine whether incremental hemodialysis is well tolerated, effective, and facilitates a more favorable transition to dialysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":10960,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","volume":"34 1","pages":"33-40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incremental hemodialysis transition in veterans and nonveterans with kidney failure.\",\"authors\":\"Connie M Rhee, Csaba P Kovesdy, Mark Unruh, Susan Crowley, David Geller, David S Goldfarb, Jeffrey Kraut, Mandana Rastegar, Ian R Rifkin, Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MNH.0000000000001040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Initiation of hemodialysis treatment with a thrice-weekly prescription is currently the standard of care irrespective of patients' residual kidney function (RKF), comorbidities, and preferences.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Each year ∼12 000 Veterans with advanced kidney disease progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis and comprise greater than 10% of the US incident ESKD population. Dialysis is costly and is associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and high mortality risk, especially in the first year of treatment. Evidence suggests an incremental dialysis transition using twice-weekly hemodialysis provides various benefits, including more dialysis-free time, longer RKF preservation, less vascular access damage, and lower patient burden. Pragmatic studies are needed to inform the efficacy and safety of incremental hemodialysis as a personalized dialysis regimen, and could inform its consideration as a conservation strategy during times of supply shortages. Broadly implementing twice-weekly hemodialysis could also potentially allow more Veterans to receive care within VA-based dialysis units. The VA IncHVets Trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of twice-weekly incremental vs. thrice-weekly hemodialysis among Veterans transitioning to ESKD.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Further research is needed to determine whether incremental hemodialysis is well tolerated, effective, and facilitates a more favorable transition to dialysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"33-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0000000000001040\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNH.0000000000001040","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾目的:每周三次的血液透析治疗处方是目前的标准治疗,无论患者的残余肾功能(RKF)、合并症和偏好如何。最近的发现:每年约有12,000名患有晚期肾病的退伍军人进展为需要透析的终末期肾病(ESKD),占美国ESKD发病率的10%以上。透析费用昂贵,与健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)受损和高死亡风险相关,特别是在治疗的第一年。有证据表明,使用每周两次血液透析的增量透析过渡可以提供各种益处,包括更多的无透析时间,更长的RKF保存,更少的血管通路损伤和更低的患者负担。需要实际的研究来告知增量血液透析作为一种个性化透析方案的有效性和安全性,并可以告知其在供应短缺时期作为一种保护策略的考虑。广泛实施每周两次的血液透析也可能使更多的退伍军人在va透析单位接受护理。VA IncHVets试验是一项实用的多中心随机对照试验,比较了向ESKD过渡的退伍军人每周两次增量血液透析和每周三次血液透析的有效性和安全性。总结:需要进一步的研究来确定渐进式血液透析是否耐受性良好、有效,并促进更有利的透析过渡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incremental hemodialysis transition in veterans and nonveterans with kidney failure.

Purpose of review: Initiation of hemodialysis treatment with a thrice-weekly prescription is currently the standard of care irrespective of patients' residual kidney function (RKF), comorbidities, and preferences.

Recent findings: Each year ∼12 000 Veterans with advanced kidney disease progress to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis and comprise greater than 10% of the US incident ESKD population. Dialysis is costly and is associated with impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and high mortality risk, especially in the first year of treatment. Evidence suggests an incremental dialysis transition using twice-weekly hemodialysis provides various benefits, including more dialysis-free time, longer RKF preservation, less vascular access damage, and lower patient burden. Pragmatic studies are needed to inform the efficacy and safety of incremental hemodialysis as a personalized dialysis regimen, and could inform its consideration as a conservation strategy during times of supply shortages. Broadly implementing twice-weekly hemodialysis could also potentially allow more Veterans to receive care within VA-based dialysis units. The VA IncHVets Trial is a pragmatic, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of twice-weekly incremental vs. thrice-weekly hemodialysis among Veterans transitioning to ESKD.

Summary: Further research is needed to determine whether incremental hemodialysis is well tolerated, effective, and facilitates a more favorable transition to dialysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.20%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of nephrology and hypertension. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including pathophysiology of hypertension, circulation and hemodynamics, and clinical nephrology. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信