欧洲对托法替尼(Xeljanz®)额外风险最小化措施有效性的评估:一项处方调查

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-28 DOI:10.1007/s40261-024-01408-5
Joanne Wu, Nana Koram, Kofi Asomaning, Lubna Merchant, Robert Massouh, Edward Nagy, Subhan Khalid, Laura Walsh, Rafia Bosan, Krystal Cantos
{"title":"欧洲对托法替尼(Xeljanz®)额外风险最小化措施有效性的评估:一项处方调查","authors":"Joanne Wu, Nana Koram, Kofi Asomaning, Lubna Merchant, Robert Massouh, Edward Nagy, Subhan Khalid, Laura Walsh, Rafia Bosan, Krystal Cantos","doi":"10.1007/s40261-024-01408-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the effectiveness of tofacitinib (oral Janus kinase inhibitor) additional risk minimisation measures (aRMM) in Europe via prescriber surveys. Operational challenges/methodological limitations of surveys and recommendations for future considerations were summarised.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post-authorisation safety study, multimodal surveys were conducted in eight European countries from 2021 to 2022 among prescribers of tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis and/or psoriatic arthritis (RA/PsA) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the 12 months preceding survey administration. Prescribers' awareness (receipt) of aRMM materials, knowledge of key risk messages and adherence to risk minimisation practices were assessed. A priori effectiveness thresholds (≥ ~80%) were set across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18,764 and 12,777 prescribers invited to take the RA/PsA or UC survey, 164 and 81 completed the surveys, respectively (response proportion: 326/18,764, 1.7%; 154/12,777, 1.2%, respectively). Among completers, self-reported receipt of all initial and/or 2019 updated aRMM materials was 33.5% and 32.7% in the RA/PsA and UC surveys, respectively. In the RA/PsA and UC surveys, 39.5% and 24.5%, respectively, answered ≥ ~80% of knowledge questions correctly; 51.2% and 69.7%, respectively, provided desirable responses to ≥ ~80% of adherence questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the tofacitinib aRMM materials did not achieve the desired effectiveness for awareness (receipt), knowledge or adherence to risk minimisation practices among survey completers, the study was deemed inconclusive given the low response rate. This demonstrated that unless an acceptable response rate is achieved, surveys should not be the only method for aRMM evaluation. Secondary data may supplement future surveys to increase their robustness.</p><p><strong>Hma-ema catalogues registration: </strong>EUPAS43143 (date of registration: 29/09/2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"961-974"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638417/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimisation Measures for Tofacitinib (Xeljanz<sup>®</sup>) in Europe: A Prescriber Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne Wu, Nana Koram, Kofi Asomaning, Lubna Merchant, Robert Massouh, Edward Nagy, Subhan Khalid, Laura Walsh, Rafia Bosan, Krystal Cantos\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40261-024-01408-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated the effectiveness of tofacitinib (oral Janus kinase inhibitor) additional risk minimisation measures (aRMM) in Europe via prescriber surveys. Operational challenges/methodological limitations of surveys and recommendations for future considerations were summarised.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this post-authorisation safety study, multimodal surveys were conducted in eight European countries from 2021 to 2022 among prescribers of tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis and/or psoriatic arthritis (RA/PsA) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the 12 months preceding survey administration. Prescribers' awareness (receipt) of aRMM materials, knowledge of key risk messages and adherence to risk minimisation practices were assessed. A priori effectiveness thresholds (≥ ~80%) were set across outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 18,764 and 12,777 prescribers invited to take the RA/PsA or UC survey, 164 and 81 completed the surveys, respectively (response proportion: 326/18,764, 1.7%; 154/12,777, 1.2%, respectively). Among completers, self-reported receipt of all initial and/or 2019 updated aRMM materials was 33.5% and 32.7% in the RA/PsA and UC surveys, respectively. In the RA/PsA and UC surveys, 39.5% and 24.5%, respectively, answered ≥ ~80% of knowledge questions correctly; 51.2% and 69.7%, respectively, provided desirable responses to ≥ ~80% of adherence questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the tofacitinib aRMM materials did not achieve the desired effectiveness for awareness (receipt), knowledge or adherence to risk minimisation practices among survey completers, the study was deemed inconclusive given the low response rate. This demonstrated that unless an acceptable response rate is achieved, surveys should not be the only method for aRMM evaluation. Secondary data may supplement future surveys to increase their robustness.</p><p><strong>Hma-ema catalogues registration: </strong>EUPAS43143 (date of registration: 29/09/2021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"961-974\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638417/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01408-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01408-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们通过处方调查评估了托法替尼(口服Janus激酶抑制剂)额外风险最小化措施(aRMM)在欧洲的有效性。总结了调查的业务挑战/方法限制和对今后考虑的建议。方法:在这项批准后安全性研究中,从2021年到2022年,在8个欧洲国家对托法替尼治疗类风湿关节炎和/或银屑病关节炎(RA/PsA)或溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的处方者进行了多模式调查。评估了开处方者对aRMM材料的认识(接收)、对关键风险信息的了解以及对风险最小化实践的依从性。先验有效性阈值(≥~80%)在各结局中设置。结果:在受邀参加RA/PsA或UC调查的18,764名和12,777名处方医师中,分别有164名和81名完成了调查(回应比例:326/18,764,1.7%;154/12,777,分别为1.2%)。在RA/PsA和UC调查中,完成者自我报告收到所有初始和/或2019年更新的aRMM材料的比例分别为33.5%和32.7%。在RA/PsA和UC调查中,分别有39.5%和24.5%的学生正确回答≥80%的知识问题;分别有51.2%和69.7%的患者对≥~80%的依从性问题提供了满意的回答。结论:尽管托法替尼aRMM材料在调查完成者的意识(接收)、知识或对风险最小化实践的依从性方面没有达到预期的有效性,但鉴于低回复率,该研究被认为是不确定的。这表明,除非达到可接受的回复率,否则调查不应该是评估aRMM的唯一方法。辅助数据可以补充未来的调查,以增加其稳健性。hma目录注册:EUPAS43143(注册日期:29/09/2021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Additional Risk Minimisation Measures for Tofacitinib (Xeljanz®) in Europe: A Prescriber Survey.

Objective: We evaluated the effectiveness of tofacitinib (oral Janus kinase inhibitor) additional risk minimisation measures (aRMM) in Europe via prescriber surveys. Operational challenges/methodological limitations of surveys and recommendations for future considerations were summarised.

Methods: In this post-authorisation safety study, multimodal surveys were conducted in eight European countries from 2021 to 2022 among prescribers of tofacitinib for rheumatoid arthritis and/or psoriatic arthritis (RA/PsA) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in the 12 months preceding survey administration. Prescribers' awareness (receipt) of aRMM materials, knowledge of key risk messages and adherence to risk minimisation practices were assessed. A priori effectiveness thresholds (≥ ~80%) were set across outcomes.

Results: Of 18,764 and 12,777 prescribers invited to take the RA/PsA or UC survey, 164 and 81 completed the surveys, respectively (response proportion: 326/18,764, 1.7%; 154/12,777, 1.2%, respectively). Among completers, self-reported receipt of all initial and/or 2019 updated aRMM materials was 33.5% and 32.7% in the RA/PsA and UC surveys, respectively. In the RA/PsA and UC surveys, 39.5% and 24.5%, respectively, answered ≥ ~80% of knowledge questions correctly; 51.2% and 69.7%, respectively, provided desirable responses to ≥ ~80% of adherence questions.

Conclusions: Although the tofacitinib aRMM materials did not achieve the desired effectiveness for awareness (receipt), knowledge or adherence to risk minimisation practices among survey completers, the study was deemed inconclusive given the low response rate. This demonstrated that unless an acceptable response rate is achieved, surveys should not be the only method for aRMM evaluation. Secondary data may supplement future surveys to increase their robustness.

Hma-ema catalogues registration: EUPAS43143 (date of registration: 29/09/2021).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信