间质性肺疾病特异性生物标志物的诊断性能:单中心研究

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Anu S Maharjan, Sogol S Amjadi, Troy D Jaskowski, Sonia L La'ulu, Dorota Lebiedz-Odrobina, Tracy M Frech, Anne E Tebo
{"title":"间质性肺疾病特异性生物标志物的诊断性能:单中心研究","authors":"Anu S Maharjan, Sogol S Amjadi, Troy D Jaskowski, Sonia L La'ulu, Dorota Lebiedz-Odrobina, Tracy M Frech, Anne E Tebo","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) in the evaluation and management of interstitial lung disease (ILD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum KL-6, SP-A, SP-D levels were measured in 122 unique consecutive patients referred for connective tissue disease (CTD) associated ILD (CTD-ILD) autoantibodies and 120 \"healthy\" controls. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed and categorized as ILD and non-ILD or CTD-ILD and other ILD. All biomarkers were evaluated for diagnosis and moderate vs. severe ILD based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ILD was diagnosed in 52 % (n=64) and non-ILD in 48 % (n=58). ILD patients were categorized as other ILD (61 %, n=39) or CTD-ILD (39 %, n=25). Patients with ILD had significantly elevated levels of SP-A (p<0.02), KL-6 or SP-D (both p<0.0001) when compared to those with non-ILD. The mean levels of all biomarkers were significantly elevated levels in the ILD compared to non-ILD group (p<0.0001). No significant difference in biomarker levels between CTD-ILD and other ILD groups (p≥0.900). Biomarkers had comparable specificities (89-93 %) however; sensitivities were variable at 75 , 77 and 17 % for KL-6, SP-D and SP-A, respectively. Combination of KL-6 and SP-D yielded comparable diagnostic accuracy to all biomarkers with median levels significantly higher in patients with severe vs. mild disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>KL-6 and SP-D levels are elevated in ILD and therefore contribute to the diagnosis and risk stratification for patient management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of specific biomarkers for interstitial lung disease: a single center study.\",\"authors\":\"Anu S Maharjan, Sogol S Amjadi, Troy D Jaskowski, Sonia L La'ulu, Dorota Lebiedz-Odrobina, Tracy M Frech, Anne E Tebo\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/cclm-2024-1048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) in the evaluation and management of interstitial lung disease (ILD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum KL-6, SP-A, SP-D levels were measured in 122 unique consecutive patients referred for connective tissue disease (CTD) associated ILD (CTD-ILD) autoantibodies and 120 \\\"healthy\\\" controls. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed and categorized as ILD and non-ILD or CTD-ILD and other ILD. All biomarkers were evaluated for diagnosis and moderate vs. severe ILD based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ILD was diagnosed in 52 % (n=64) and non-ILD in 48 % (n=58). ILD patients were categorized as other ILD (61 %, n=39) or CTD-ILD (39 %, n=25). Patients with ILD had significantly elevated levels of SP-A (p<0.02), KL-6 or SP-D (both p<0.0001) when compared to those with non-ILD. The mean levels of all biomarkers were significantly elevated levels in the ILD compared to non-ILD group (p<0.0001). No significant difference in biomarker levels between CTD-ILD and other ILD groups (p≥0.900). Biomarkers had comparable specificities (89-93 %) however; sensitivities were variable at 75 , 77 and 17 % for KL-6, SP-D and SP-A, respectively. Combination of KL-6 and SP-D yielded comparable diagnostic accuracy to all biomarkers with median levels significantly higher in patients with severe vs. mild disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>KL-6 and SP-D levels are elevated in ILD and therefore contribute to the diagnosis and risk stratification for patient management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1048\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6)、表面活性蛋白A (SP-A)和表面活性蛋白D (SP-D)在评估和治疗间质性肺疾病(ILD)中的临床意义。方法:测定122例结缔组织病(CTD)相关ILD (CTD-ILD)自身抗体的独特连续患者和120名“健康”对照者的血清KL-6、SP-A、SP-D水平。对患者病历进行回顾性分析,并将其分类为ILD和非ILD或CTD-ILD和其他ILD。基于高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)评估所有生物标志物的诊断和中度与重度ILD。结果:52% % (n=64)诊断为ILD, 48% % (n=58)诊断为非ILD。ILD患者分为其他ILD(61 %,n=39)或CTD-ILD(39 %,n=25)。结论:KL-6和SP-D水平在ILD中升高,因此有助于诊断和患者管理的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic performance of specific biomarkers for interstitial lung disease: a single center study.

Objectives: This study aimed to determine the clinical significance of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6), surfactant proteins A (SP-A) and D (SP-D) in the evaluation and management of interstitial lung disease (ILD).

Methods: Serum KL-6, SP-A, SP-D levels were measured in 122 unique consecutive patients referred for connective tissue disease (CTD) associated ILD (CTD-ILD) autoantibodies and 120 "healthy" controls. Patients' charts were retrospectively reviewed and categorized as ILD and non-ILD or CTD-ILD and other ILD. All biomarkers were evaluated for diagnosis and moderate vs. severe ILD based on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

Results: ILD was diagnosed in 52 % (n=64) and non-ILD in 48 % (n=58). ILD patients were categorized as other ILD (61 %, n=39) or CTD-ILD (39 %, n=25). Patients with ILD had significantly elevated levels of SP-A (p<0.02), KL-6 or SP-D (both p<0.0001) when compared to those with non-ILD. The mean levels of all biomarkers were significantly elevated levels in the ILD compared to non-ILD group (p<0.0001). No significant difference in biomarker levels between CTD-ILD and other ILD groups (p≥0.900). Biomarkers had comparable specificities (89-93 %) however; sensitivities were variable at 75 , 77 and 17 % for KL-6, SP-D and SP-A, respectively. Combination of KL-6 and SP-D yielded comparable diagnostic accuracy to all biomarkers with median levels significantly higher in patients with severe vs. mild disease.

Conclusions: KL-6 and SP-D levels are elevated in ILD and therefore contribute to the diagnosis and risk stratification for patient management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信