{"title":"使用对比增强和非对比增强计算机断层扫描图像预测边缘可切除胰腺癌远处转移的δ放射组学方法","authors":"Takanori Adachi PhD , Mitsuhiro Nakamura PhD , Takahiro Iwai PhD , Michio Yoshimura MD, PhD , Takashi Mizowaki MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To predict distant metastasis (DM) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma using delta-radiomics features calculated from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and non-CECT images.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Among 250 patients who underwent radiation therapy at our institution between February 2013 and December 2021, 67 patients were deemed eligible. A total of 11 clinical features and 3906 radiomics features were incorporated. Radiomics features were extracted from CECT and non-CECT images, and the differences between these features were calculated, resulting in delta-radiomics features. The patients were randomly divided into the training (70%) and test (30%) data sets for model development and validation. Predictive models were developed with clinical features (clinical model), radiomics features (radiomics model), and a combination of the abovementioned features (hybrid model) using Fine-Gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF). Optimal hyperparameters were determined using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Subsequently, the developed models were applied to the remaining test data sets, and the patients were divided into high- or low-risk groups based on their risk scores. Prognostic power was assessed using the concordance index, with 95% CIs obtained through 2000 bootstrapping iterations. Statistical significance between the above groups was assessed using Gray's test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At a median follow-up period of 23.8 months, 47 (70.1%) patients developed DM. The concordance indices of the FG-based clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models were 0.548, 0.603, and 0.623, respectively, in the test data set, whereas those of the RSF-based models were 0.598, 0.680, and 0.727, respectively. The RSF-based model, including delta-radiomics features, significantly divided the cumulative incidence curves into two risk groups (<em>P</em> < .05). The feature map of the gray-level size-zone matrix showed that the difference in feature values between CECT and non-CECT images correlated with the incidence of DM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Delta-radiomics features obtained from CECT and non-CECT images using RSF successfully predict the incidence of DM in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 1","pages":"Article 101669"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delta-Radiomics Approach Using Contrast-Enhanced and Noncontrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images for Predicting Distant Metastasis in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Takanori Adachi PhD , Mitsuhiro Nakamura PhD , Takahiro Iwai PhD , Michio Yoshimura MD, PhD , Takashi Mizowaki MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To predict distant metastasis (DM) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma using delta-radiomics features calculated from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and non-CECT images.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Among 250 patients who underwent radiation therapy at our institution between February 2013 and December 2021, 67 patients were deemed eligible. A total of 11 clinical features and 3906 radiomics features were incorporated. Radiomics features were extracted from CECT and non-CECT images, and the differences between these features were calculated, resulting in delta-radiomics features. The patients were randomly divided into the training (70%) and test (30%) data sets for model development and validation. Predictive models were developed with clinical features (clinical model), radiomics features (radiomics model), and a combination of the abovementioned features (hybrid model) using Fine-Gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF). Optimal hyperparameters were determined using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Subsequently, the developed models were applied to the remaining test data sets, and the patients were divided into high- or low-risk groups based on their risk scores. Prognostic power was assessed using the concordance index, with 95% CIs obtained through 2000 bootstrapping iterations. Statistical significance between the above groups was assessed using Gray's test.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At a median follow-up period of 23.8 months, 47 (70.1%) patients developed DM. The concordance indices of the FG-based clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models were 0.548, 0.603, and 0.623, respectively, in the test data set, whereas those of the RSF-based models were 0.598, 0.680, and 0.727, respectively. The RSF-based model, including delta-radiomics features, significantly divided the cumulative incidence curves into two risk groups (<em>P</em> < .05). The feature map of the gray-level size-zone matrix showed that the difference in feature values between CECT and non-CECT images correlated with the incidence of DM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Delta-radiomics features obtained from CECT and non-CECT images using RSF successfully predict the incidence of DM in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400232X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S245210942400232X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Delta-Radiomics Approach Using Contrast-Enhanced and Noncontrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Images for Predicting Distant Metastasis in Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Carcinoma
Purpose
To predict distant metastasis (DM) in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma using delta-radiomics features calculated from contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and non-CECT images.
Methods and Materials
Among 250 patients who underwent radiation therapy at our institution between February 2013 and December 2021, 67 patients were deemed eligible. A total of 11 clinical features and 3906 radiomics features were incorporated. Radiomics features were extracted from CECT and non-CECT images, and the differences between these features were calculated, resulting in delta-radiomics features. The patients were randomly divided into the training (70%) and test (30%) data sets for model development and validation. Predictive models were developed with clinical features (clinical model), radiomics features (radiomics model), and a combination of the abovementioned features (hybrid model) using Fine-Gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF). Optimal hyperparameters were determined using stratified 5-fold cross-validation. Subsequently, the developed models were applied to the remaining test data sets, and the patients were divided into high- or low-risk groups based on their risk scores. Prognostic power was assessed using the concordance index, with 95% CIs obtained through 2000 bootstrapping iterations. Statistical significance between the above groups was assessed using Gray's test.
Results
At a median follow-up period of 23.8 months, 47 (70.1%) patients developed DM. The concordance indices of the FG-based clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models were 0.548, 0.603, and 0.623, respectively, in the test data set, whereas those of the RSF-based models were 0.598, 0.680, and 0.727, respectively. The RSF-based model, including delta-radiomics features, significantly divided the cumulative incidence curves into two risk groups (P < .05). The feature map of the gray-level size-zone matrix showed that the difference in feature values between CECT and non-CECT images correlated with the incidence of DM.
Conclusions
Delta-radiomics features obtained from CECT and non-CECT images using RSF successfully predict the incidence of DM in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.