气候变化相关生殖问题量表(CCRCS)的编制与验证

Matteo Innocenti , Gabriele Santarelli , Chiara Comerci , Niccolò Carluccio , Enrico Anzaghi , Chiara Cadeddu
{"title":"气候变化相关生殖问题量表(CCRCS)的编制与验证","authors":"Matteo Innocenti ,&nbsp;Gabriele Santarelli ,&nbsp;Chiara Comerci ,&nbsp;Niccolò Carluccio ,&nbsp;Enrico Anzaghi ,&nbsp;Chiara Cadeddu","doi":"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>As global concerns about climate change intensify, emerging research reveals a link between climate change anxiety and individuals' decisions regarding parenthood. More people are choosing not to have children due to worries about their carbon footprint or the future implications of climate change on their offspring. This trend emphasizes the critical necessity for a nuanced comprehension of how environmental concerns intertwine with reproductive intentions. To address this imperative, our study develops the Climate Change-related Reproductive Concerns Scale (CCRCS) and evaluates its psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CCRCS was developed and validated in a sample of 206 Italian adults aged 19 to 51. Ten items were created to evaluate climate change-related reproductive attitudes: 5 anti-reproductive items and 5 pro-reproductive, with their responses reversed for consistency in interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exploratory factor analysis revealed a single-factor structure, explaining 63.82 % of the variance, with the scale demonstrating good internal consistency (α = 0.85). The factor structure was replicated, and the scale's validity was examined through correlations with measures of eco-paralysis and climate change anxiety, with significant correlations supporting construct validity. Furthermore, the relationship between climate change-related reproductive concerns and adaptation responses was explored, assessing the impact of framing on CCRCS scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CCRCS provides a reliable and valid measure of these concerns, highlighting the psychological impact of climate change anxiety on reproductive decision-making and emphasizing the need for nuanced understanding in this area.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":75054,"journal":{"name":"The journal of climate change and health","volume":"20 ","pages":"Article 100351"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of the climate change-related reproductive concerns scale (CCRCS)\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Innocenti ,&nbsp;Gabriele Santarelli ,&nbsp;Chiara Comerci ,&nbsp;Niccolò Carluccio ,&nbsp;Enrico Anzaghi ,&nbsp;Chiara Cadeddu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joclim.2024.100351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>As global concerns about climate change intensify, emerging research reveals a link between climate change anxiety and individuals' decisions regarding parenthood. More people are choosing not to have children due to worries about their carbon footprint or the future implications of climate change on their offspring. This trend emphasizes the critical necessity for a nuanced comprehension of how environmental concerns intertwine with reproductive intentions. To address this imperative, our study develops the Climate Change-related Reproductive Concerns Scale (CCRCS) and evaluates its psychometric properties.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>CCRCS was developed and validated in a sample of 206 Italian adults aged 19 to 51. Ten items were created to evaluate climate change-related reproductive attitudes: 5 anti-reproductive items and 5 pro-reproductive, with their responses reversed for consistency in interpretation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Exploratory factor analysis revealed a single-factor structure, explaining 63.82 % of the variance, with the scale demonstrating good internal consistency (α = 0.85). The factor structure was replicated, and the scale's validity was examined through correlations with measures of eco-paralysis and climate change anxiety, with significant correlations supporting construct validity. Furthermore, the relationship between climate change-related reproductive concerns and adaptation responses was explored, assessing the impact of framing on CCRCS scores.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The CCRCS provides a reliable and valid measure of these concerns, highlighting the psychological impact of climate change anxiety on reproductive decision-making and emphasizing the need for nuanced understanding in this area.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of climate change and health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of climate change and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667278224000543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着全球对气候变化的担忧加剧,新兴研究揭示了气候变化焦虑与个人关于生育的决定之间的联系。越来越多的人选择不要孩子,因为他们担心自己的碳足迹或气候变化对后代的未来影响。这种趋势强调了细致入微地理解环境问题如何与生殖意图交织在一起的关键必要性。为了解决这一问题,本研究开发了气候变化相关生殖关注量表(CCRCS)并评估了其心理测量特性。方法开发sccrcs并在206名19 ~ 51岁的意大利成年人样本中进行验证。我们创建了10个项目来评估与气候变化相关的生殖态度:5个反对生殖的项目和5个支持生殖的项目,为了解释的一致性,他们的回答是相反的。结果探索性因子分析显示单因素结构,解释了63.82%的方差,量表具有良好的内部一致性(α = 0.85)。对因子结构进行了复制,并通过与生态麻痹和气候变化焦虑测度的相关性检验了量表的效度,结果表明量表的结构效度具有显著的相关性。此外,研究了气候变化相关生殖问题与适应响应之间的关系,评估了框架对CCRCS得分的影响。结论CCRCS为这些担忧提供了一个可靠而有效的衡量标准,突出了气候变化焦虑对生殖决策的心理影响,并强调了对这一领域细致理解的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of the climate change-related reproductive concerns scale (CCRCS)

Introduction

As global concerns about climate change intensify, emerging research reveals a link between climate change anxiety and individuals' decisions regarding parenthood. More people are choosing not to have children due to worries about their carbon footprint or the future implications of climate change on their offspring. This trend emphasizes the critical necessity for a nuanced comprehension of how environmental concerns intertwine with reproductive intentions. To address this imperative, our study develops the Climate Change-related Reproductive Concerns Scale (CCRCS) and evaluates its psychometric properties.

Methods

CCRCS was developed and validated in a sample of 206 Italian adults aged 19 to 51. Ten items were created to evaluate climate change-related reproductive attitudes: 5 anti-reproductive items and 5 pro-reproductive, with their responses reversed for consistency in interpretation.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis revealed a single-factor structure, explaining 63.82 % of the variance, with the scale demonstrating good internal consistency (α = 0.85). The factor structure was replicated, and the scale's validity was examined through correlations with measures of eco-paralysis and climate change anxiety, with significant correlations supporting construct validity. Furthermore, the relationship between climate change-related reproductive concerns and adaptation responses was explored, assessing the impact of framing on CCRCS scores.

Conclusion

The CCRCS provides a reliable and valid measure of these concerns, highlighting the psychological impact of climate change anxiety on reproductive decision-making and emphasizing the need for nuanced understanding in this area.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The journal of climate change and health
The journal of climate change and health Global and Planetary Change, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信