点击背后:亚马逊能随心所欲地分配用户注意力吗?

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rufus Rock, Ilan Strauss, Tim O'Reilly, Mariana Mazzucato
{"title":"点击背后:亚马逊能随心所欲地分配用户注意力吗?","authors":"Rufus Rock,&nbsp;Ilan Strauss,&nbsp;Tim O'Reilly,&nbsp;Mariana Mazzucato","doi":"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We investigate Amazon's ability to direct user clicks to more visually prominent search results, even as quality declines with the increasing prevalence of sponsored advertising products. We analyze product results from over 2,000 Amazon Marketplace search queries to estimate how a top three most clicked product's features (price and quality) and screen placement influence a user's clicks. Our econometric results show that the position of a product search result (“position bias”), adjusted for its relative prominence on the screen, strongly shapes whether a user clicks on it. Within the top five search results, where typically four are advertisements, users exhibit decreased sensitivity to a product's relevance or pricing. This allows Amazon's sponsored ads to leverage product prominence as a mechanism for rent extraction from users and producers. Regulatory frameworks might limit platforms from exploiting consumers' satisficing behaviour online, including via moderating excessive advertising in algorithmic search results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47029,"journal":{"name":"Information Economics and Policy","volume":"69 ","pages":"Article 101115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Behind the clicks: Can Amazon allocate user attention as it pleases?\",\"authors\":\"Rufus Rock,&nbsp;Ilan Strauss,&nbsp;Tim O'Reilly,&nbsp;Mariana Mazzucato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2024.101115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We investigate Amazon's ability to direct user clicks to more visually prominent search results, even as quality declines with the increasing prevalence of sponsored advertising products. We analyze product results from over 2,000 Amazon Marketplace search queries to estimate how a top three most clicked product's features (price and quality) and screen placement influence a user's clicks. Our econometric results show that the position of a product search result (“position bias”), adjusted for its relative prominence on the screen, strongly shapes whether a user clicks on it. Within the top five search results, where typically four are advertisements, users exhibit decreased sensitivity to a product's relevance or pricing. This allows Amazon's sponsored ads to leverage product prominence as a mechanism for rent extraction from users and producers. Regulatory frameworks might limit platforms from exploiting consumers' satisficing behaviour online, including via moderating excessive advertising in algorithmic search results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624524000374\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167624524000374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们调查了亚马逊引导用户点击到视觉上更突出的搜索结果的能力,即使随着赞助广告产品的日益普及,搜索结果的质量也在下降。我们分析了超过2000个亚马逊市场搜索查询的产品结果,以估计点击最多的前三个产品的功能(价格和质量)和屏幕位置如何影响用户的点击。我们的计量经济学结果表明,产品搜索结果的位置(“位置偏差”),根据其在屏幕上的相对突出程度进行调整,强烈地影响了用户是否点击它。在排名前五的搜索结果中,通常有四个是广告,用户对产品相关性或价格的敏感度降低。这使得亚马逊的赞助广告可以利用产品的突出性,作为一种从用户和生产者那里榨取租金的机制。监管框架可能会限制平台利用消费者的在线满意行为,包括通过缓和算法搜索结果中的过多广告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Behind the clicks: Can Amazon allocate user attention as it pleases?
We investigate Amazon's ability to direct user clicks to more visually prominent search results, even as quality declines with the increasing prevalence of sponsored advertising products. We analyze product results from over 2,000 Amazon Marketplace search queries to estimate how a top three most clicked product's features (price and quality) and screen placement influence a user's clicks. Our econometric results show that the position of a product search result (“position bias”), adjusted for its relative prominence on the screen, strongly shapes whether a user clicks on it. Within the top five search results, where typically four are advertisements, users exhibit decreased sensitivity to a product's relevance or pricing. This allows Amazon's sponsored ads to leverage product prominence as a mechanism for rent extraction from users and producers. Regulatory frameworks might limit platforms from exploiting consumers' satisficing behaviour online, including via moderating excessive advertising in algorithmic search results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: IEP is an international journal that aims to publish peer-reviewed policy-oriented research about the production, distribution and use of information, including these subjects: the economics of the telecommunications, mass media, and other information industries, the economics of innovation and intellectual property, the role of information in economic development, and the role of information and information technology in the functioning of markets. The purpose of the journal is to provide an interdisciplinary and international forum for theoretical and empirical research that addresses the needs of other researchers, government, and professionals who are involved in the policy-making process. IEP publishes research papers, short contributions, and surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信