SFACIF:一个安全功能攻击和异常工业条件识别框架

IF 4.4 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Kaixiang Liu , Yongfang Xie , Yuqi Chen , Shiwen Xie , Xin Chen , Dongliang Fang , Limin Sun
{"title":"SFACIF:一个安全功能攻击和异常工业条件识别框架","authors":"Kaixiang Liu ,&nbsp;Yongfang Xie ,&nbsp;Yuqi Chen ,&nbsp;Shiwen Xie ,&nbsp;Xin Chen ,&nbsp;Dongliang Fang ,&nbsp;Limin Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-stakes process industries require a harmonious relationship between the Safety Instrumented System (SIS) and the Basic Process Control System (BPCS) to guarantee the safety and stability of operations. As security threats to SIS intensify, the imperative to fortify it against cyber-attacks has never been more critical. SIS activates safety functions to bring the process to a safe state or shut it down under anomaly idustrial conditions. This raises two critical questions for SIS security: (1) how to differentiate between genuine industrial anomalies and data injected by attackers to prevent unnecessary shutdowns and economic losses; and (2) how to distinguish between attackers’ replayed data and normal operational data to avoid casualties resulting from delayed shutdowns. In addressing these challenges, we introduce SFACIF, a framework designed to effectively identify safety function attacks and anomaly industrial conditions. Inspired by advanced two out of three voting mechanisms and process monitoring technologies, our approach encompasses several innovative strategies. Initially, a deep learning-based time series prediction method is employed to generate benchmark data. Next, potential issues are identified by detecting deviations through pairwise comparisons between the predicted benchmark data, SIS observations, and BPCS observations. To account for the higher fault rates in BPCS and the presence of process noise, we apply a modified sliding window residual statistical method for analysis. Lastly, we introduce a novel coding scheme to interpret the results of the three-way comparison, enabling the identification of safety function attacks and anomaly industrial conditions. To validate the efficacy of SFACIF, we devised a physical simulation platform that mirrors real-world industrial environments, facilitating a rigorous assessment of our framework under operational conditions. The performance metrics underscore the superior capability of SFACIF, which achieved 99% accuracy and 1% false alarm rate. These results not only attest to the ability of SFACIF to accurately differentiate between various attack vectors but also highlight its proficiency in discerning between authentic and manipulated data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50637,"journal":{"name":"Computer Networks","volume":"257 ","pages":"Article 110927"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SFACIF: A safety function attack and anomaly industrial condition identified framework\",\"authors\":\"Kaixiang Liu ,&nbsp;Yongfang Xie ,&nbsp;Yuqi Chen ,&nbsp;Shiwen Xie ,&nbsp;Xin Chen ,&nbsp;Dongliang Fang ,&nbsp;Limin Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.comnet.2024.110927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>High-stakes process industries require a harmonious relationship between the Safety Instrumented System (SIS) and the Basic Process Control System (BPCS) to guarantee the safety and stability of operations. As security threats to SIS intensify, the imperative to fortify it against cyber-attacks has never been more critical. SIS activates safety functions to bring the process to a safe state or shut it down under anomaly idustrial conditions. This raises two critical questions for SIS security: (1) how to differentiate between genuine industrial anomalies and data injected by attackers to prevent unnecessary shutdowns and economic losses; and (2) how to distinguish between attackers’ replayed data and normal operational data to avoid casualties resulting from delayed shutdowns. In addressing these challenges, we introduce SFACIF, a framework designed to effectively identify safety function attacks and anomaly industrial conditions. Inspired by advanced two out of three voting mechanisms and process monitoring technologies, our approach encompasses several innovative strategies. Initially, a deep learning-based time series prediction method is employed to generate benchmark data. Next, potential issues are identified by detecting deviations through pairwise comparisons between the predicted benchmark data, SIS observations, and BPCS observations. To account for the higher fault rates in BPCS and the presence of process noise, we apply a modified sliding window residual statistical method for analysis. Lastly, we introduce a novel coding scheme to interpret the results of the three-way comparison, enabling the identification of safety function attacks and anomaly industrial conditions. To validate the efficacy of SFACIF, we devised a physical simulation platform that mirrors real-world industrial environments, facilitating a rigorous assessment of our framework under operational conditions. The performance metrics underscore the superior capability of SFACIF, which achieved 99% accuracy and 1% false alarm rate. These results not only attest to the ability of SFACIF to accurately differentiate between various attack vectors but also highlight its proficiency in discerning between authentic and manipulated data.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Networks\",\"volume\":\"257 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138912862400759X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Networks","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138912862400759X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高风险的过程工业需要安全仪表系统(SIS)和基本过程控制系统(BPCS)之间的和谐关系,以保证运行的安全性和稳定性。随着对SIS的安全威胁加剧,加强对网络攻击的必要性从未像现在这样迫切。SIS激活安全功能,使过程处于安全状态,或在异常工业条件下关闭过程。这为SIS安全提出了两个关键问题:(1)如何区分真正的工业异常和攻击者注入的数据,以防止不必要的停机和经济损失;(2)如何区分攻击者的重放数据和正常运行数据,避免延迟停机造成人员伤亡。为了应对这些挑战,我们引入了SFACIF,这是一个旨在有效识别安全功能攻击和异常工业条件的框架。受先进的三选二投票机制和过程监控技术的启发,我们的方法包含了几个创新策略。首先,采用基于深度学习的时间序列预测方法生成基准数据。接下来,通过对预测基准数据、SIS观察值和BPCS观察值之间的两两比较来检测偏差,从而确定潜在问题。为了解释BPCS中较高的故障率和过程噪声的存在,我们应用了一种改进的滑动窗残差统计方法进行分析。最后,我们引入了一种新的编码方案来解释三方比较的结果,从而能够识别安全功能攻击和异常工业条件。为了验证SFACIF的有效性,我们设计了一个反映真实工业环境的物理模拟平台,便于在操作条件下对我们的框架进行严格评估。性能指标强调了SFACIF的优越性能,达到了99%的准确率和1%的误报率。这些结果不仅证明了SFACIF能够准确区分各种攻击向量,而且还突出了其识别真实数据和操纵数据的熟练程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SFACIF: A safety function attack and anomaly industrial condition identified framework
High-stakes process industries require a harmonious relationship between the Safety Instrumented System (SIS) and the Basic Process Control System (BPCS) to guarantee the safety and stability of operations. As security threats to SIS intensify, the imperative to fortify it against cyber-attacks has never been more critical. SIS activates safety functions to bring the process to a safe state or shut it down under anomaly idustrial conditions. This raises two critical questions for SIS security: (1) how to differentiate between genuine industrial anomalies and data injected by attackers to prevent unnecessary shutdowns and economic losses; and (2) how to distinguish between attackers’ replayed data and normal operational data to avoid casualties resulting from delayed shutdowns. In addressing these challenges, we introduce SFACIF, a framework designed to effectively identify safety function attacks and anomaly industrial conditions. Inspired by advanced two out of three voting mechanisms and process monitoring technologies, our approach encompasses several innovative strategies. Initially, a deep learning-based time series prediction method is employed to generate benchmark data. Next, potential issues are identified by detecting deviations through pairwise comparisons between the predicted benchmark data, SIS observations, and BPCS observations. To account for the higher fault rates in BPCS and the presence of process noise, we apply a modified sliding window residual statistical method for analysis. Lastly, we introduce a novel coding scheme to interpret the results of the three-way comparison, enabling the identification of safety function attacks and anomaly industrial conditions. To validate the efficacy of SFACIF, we devised a physical simulation platform that mirrors real-world industrial environments, facilitating a rigorous assessment of our framework under operational conditions. The performance metrics underscore the superior capability of SFACIF, which achieved 99% accuracy and 1% false alarm rate. These results not only attest to the ability of SFACIF to accurately differentiate between various attack vectors but also highlight its proficiency in discerning between authentic and manipulated data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Networks
Computer Networks 工程技术-电信学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
434
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Computer Networks is an international, archival journal providing a publication vehicle for complete coverage of all topics of interest to those involved in the computer communications networking area. The audience includes researchers, managers and operators of networks as well as designers and implementors. The Editorial Board will consider any material for publication that is of interest to those groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信