Michael Miskiewicz , Rafael Madera , Ilan Pesselev , James Gallagher , David Komatsu , James Nicholson
{"title":"接受全髋关节置换术的镰状细胞病患者的术后并发症和成本影响:一项全国住院患者样本研究","authors":"Michael Miskiewicz , Rafael Madera , Ilan Pesselev , James Gallagher , David Komatsu , James Nicholson","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic condition affecting approximately 5 % of the global population, with significant prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and an estimated 89,079 cases in the United States. Osteonecrosis, particularly of the femoral head (ONFH), is a common orthopaedic complication in SCD, often requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA) when conservative treatments fail. While THA can improve pain and function, it carries significant perioperative risks, with complication rates in patients with SCD as high as 67 %. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes, medical costs, and the impact of different THA implant designs in patients with SCD versus a matched non-SCD cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without SCD undergoing total hip arthroplasty between the fourth quarter of 2015 and 2020 were analyzed using propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression modeling. Additionally, a subgroup analysis examined outcomes based on the use of cemented versus non-cemented implants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study analyzed 2,830,040 hip arthroplasty patients, including 2535 with sickle cell disease (SCD), and after propensity score matching, found that patients with SCD had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications such as periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, infections, and acute kidney injury. Multivariate analysis confirmed SCD as an independent risk factor for these complications, along with increased hospital stays and higher charges. Additionally, patients with SCD receiving cemented implants experienced worse outcomes, including higher risks of periprosthetic fractures and infections, compared to those with non-cemented implants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found that patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergoing total hip arthroplasty had significantly higher complication rates, increased healthcare costs, and longer hospital stays, with cemented implants posing greater risks compared to press-fit implants.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"64 ","pages":"Pages 68-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative complications and cost implications in sickle cell disease patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A national inpatient sample study\",\"authors\":\"Michael Miskiewicz , Rafael Madera , Ilan Pesselev , James Gallagher , David Komatsu , James Nicholson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jor.2024.11.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic condition affecting approximately 5 % of the global population, with significant prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and an estimated 89,079 cases in the United States. Osteonecrosis, particularly of the femoral head (ONFH), is a common orthopaedic complication in SCD, often requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA) when conservative treatments fail. While THA can improve pain and function, it carries significant perioperative risks, with complication rates in patients with SCD as high as 67 %. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes, medical costs, and the impact of different THA implant designs in patients with SCD versus a matched non-SCD cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without SCD undergoing total hip arthroplasty between the fourth quarter of 2015 and 2020 were analyzed using propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression modeling. Additionally, a subgroup analysis examined outcomes based on the use of cemented versus non-cemented implants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study analyzed 2,830,040 hip arthroplasty patients, including 2535 with sickle cell disease (SCD), and after propensity score matching, found that patients with SCD had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications such as periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, infections, and acute kidney injury. Multivariate analysis confirmed SCD as an independent risk factor for these complications, along with increased hospital stays and higher charges. Additionally, patients with SCD receiving cemented implants experienced worse outcomes, including higher risks of periprosthetic fractures and infections, compared to those with non-cemented implants.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study found that patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergoing total hip arthroplasty had significantly higher complication rates, increased healthcare costs, and longer hospital stays, with cemented implants posing greater risks compared to press-fit implants.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 68-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24004112\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X24004112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postoperative complications and cost implications in sickle cell disease patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A national inpatient sample study
Background
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a genetic condition affecting approximately 5 % of the global population, with significant prevalence in sub-Saharan Africa and an estimated 89,079 cases in the United States. Osteonecrosis, particularly of the femoral head (ONFH), is a common orthopaedic complication in SCD, often requiring total hip arthroplasty (THA) when conservative treatments fail. While THA can improve pain and function, it carries significant perioperative risks, with complication rates in patients with SCD as high as 67 %. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes, medical costs, and the impact of different THA implant designs in patients with SCD versus a matched non-SCD cohort.
Methods
The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without SCD undergoing total hip arthroplasty between the fourth quarter of 2015 and 2020 were analyzed using propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression modeling. Additionally, a subgroup analysis examined outcomes based on the use of cemented versus non-cemented implants.
Results
The study analyzed 2,830,040 hip arthroplasty patients, including 2535 with sickle cell disease (SCD), and after propensity score matching, found that patients with SCD had significantly higher rates of postoperative complications such as periprosthetic fractures, dislocations, infections, and acute kidney injury. Multivariate analysis confirmed SCD as an independent risk factor for these complications, along with increased hospital stays and higher charges. Additionally, patients with SCD receiving cemented implants experienced worse outcomes, including higher risks of periprosthetic fractures and infections, compared to those with non-cemented implants.
Conclusion
This study found that patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) undergoing total hip arthroplasty had significantly higher complication rates, increased healthcare costs, and longer hospital stays, with cemented implants posing greater risks compared to press-fit implants.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.