Sung Hyun Cho, Seong Je Kim, Tae Jun Song, Dongwook Oh, Dong-Wan Seo
{"title":"在内镜超声引导下进行肝胃造口术治疗恶性胆道梗阻时,全覆盖金属支架与部分覆盖金属支架的比较(附视频)。","authors":"Sung Hyun Cho, Seong Je Kim, Tae Jun Song, Dongwook Oh, Dong-Wan Seo","doi":"10.1111/den.14952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) using a fully covered metal stent (FCMS) or partially covered metal stent (PCMS) is performed to manage unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) following unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This study aimed to compare FCMS and PCMS for EUS-HGS in patients with MBO.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We reviewed the EUS database to analyze consecutive patients with MBO who underwent EUS-HGS between November 2017 and March 2023. We performed a 1:1 matching using propensity score matching based on potential confounding factors. Stent patency, technical success, clinical success, adverse events, reintervention, and overall survival were assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The technical success rate of EUS-HGS was 92% (123/134). A total of 80 patients with technical success (40 FCMS, 40 PCMS) were selected after propensity score matching. The two groups showed similar rates of clinical success (90% vs. 88%; <i>P</i> = 0.999), early adverse events (15% vs. 20%; <i>P</i> = 0.556), late adverse events (18% vs. 33%; <i>P</i> = 0.121), reintervention (20% vs. 38%; <i>P</i> = 0.084), and median overall survival (4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6–5.5] vs. 3.8 months [95% CI 1.9–5.7]; <i>P</i> = 0.609). During follow-up, the FCMS group showed higher patency rates (85% vs. 60% at 6 months; 76% vs. 43% at 12 months; <i>P</i> = 0.030).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>FCMS and PCMS for EUS-HGS in patients with unresectable MBO showed similar rates of clinical success, as well as early and late adverse events. However, the FCMS group showed a higher cumulative stent patency rate compared to the PCMS group.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 5","pages":"532-540"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.14952","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of fully versus partially covered metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy for malignant biliary obstruction (with video)\",\"authors\":\"Sung Hyun Cho, Seong Je Kim, Tae Jun Song, Dongwook Oh, Dong-Wan Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.14952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) using a fully covered metal stent (FCMS) or partially covered metal stent (PCMS) is performed to manage unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) following unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This study aimed to compare FCMS and PCMS for EUS-HGS in patients with MBO.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We reviewed the EUS database to analyze consecutive patients with MBO who underwent EUS-HGS between November 2017 and March 2023. We performed a 1:1 matching using propensity score matching based on potential confounding factors. Stent patency, technical success, clinical success, adverse events, reintervention, and overall survival were assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The technical success rate of EUS-HGS was 92% (123/134). A total of 80 patients with technical success (40 FCMS, 40 PCMS) were selected after propensity score matching. The two groups showed similar rates of clinical success (90% vs. 88%; <i>P</i> = 0.999), early adverse events (15% vs. 20%; <i>P</i> = 0.556), late adverse events (18% vs. 33%; <i>P</i> = 0.121), reintervention (20% vs. 38%; <i>P</i> = 0.084), and median overall survival (4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6–5.5] vs. 3.8 months [95% CI 1.9–5.7]; <i>P</i> = 0.609). During follow-up, the FCMS group showed higher patency rates (85% vs. 60% at 6 months; 76% vs. 43% at 12 months; <i>P</i> = 0.030).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>FCMS and PCMS for EUS-HGS in patients with unresectable MBO showed similar rates of clinical success, as well as early and late adverse events. However, the FCMS group showed a higher cumulative stent patency rate compared to the PCMS group.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"532-540\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/den.14952\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14952\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.14952","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of fully versus partially covered metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy for malignant biliary obstruction (with video)
Background
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) using a fully covered metal stent (FCMS) or partially covered metal stent (PCMS) is performed to manage unresectable malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) following unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This study aimed to compare FCMS and PCMS for EUS-HGS in patients with MBO.
Methods
We reviewed the EUS database to analyze consecutive patients with MBO who underwent EUS-HGS between November 2017 and March 2023. We performed a 1:1 matching using propensity score matching based on potential confounding factors. Stent patency, technical success, clinical success, adverse events, reintervention, and overall survival were assessed.
Results
The technical success rate of EUS-HGS was 92% (123/134). A total of 80 patients with technical success (40 FCMS, 40 PCMS) were selected after propensity score matching. The two groups showed similar rates of clinical success (90% vs. 88%; P = 0.999), early adverse events (15% vs. 20%; P = 0.556), late adverse events (18% vs. 33%; P = 0.121), reintervention (20% vs. 38%; P = 0.084), and median overall survival (4.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.6–5.5] vs. 3.8 months [95% CI 1.9–5.7]; P = 0.609). During follow-up, the FCMS group showed higher patency rates (85% vs. 60% at 6 months; 76% vs. 43% at 12 months; P = 0.030).
Conclusions
FCMS and PCMS for EUS-HGS in patients with unresectable MBO showed similar rates of clinical success, as well as early and late adverse events. However, the FCMS group showed a higher cumulative stent patency rate compared to the PCMS group.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.