COVID-19 大流行期间公私医疗保健专业人员的心理困扰。

Q4 Medicine
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho Pub Date : 2024-11-14 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1227
Giovanna Costa Guimarães, Gabrielle Silva Pereira, Helen Cristina Neves Trindade Rodrigues Dos Santos, Elaine Cristine da Conceição Vianna, Thaís Alencar Linhares Peixoto, João Silvestre Silva-Junior, Cristiane Helena Gallasch
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间公私医疗保健专业人员的心理困扰。","authors":"Giovanna Costa Guimarães, Gabrielle Silva Pereira, Helen Cristina Neves Trindade Rodrigues Dos Santos, Elaine Cristine da Conceição Vianna, Thaís Alencar Linhares Peixoto, João Silvestre Silva-Junior, Cristiane Helena Gallasch","doi":"10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare workers in both the public and private systems were on the front line of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. As a consequence, they faced uncertainty, heavy demand, excessive working hours, and the fear of contracting the virus.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the occurrence of psychological distress among public and private healthcare workers at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, quantitative study was conducted from April to June of 2020, enrolling workers who had cared for suspected and confirmed cases of covid-19 in Brazil. Psychological distress was assessed using the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20. Associations between the outcome and independent variables were analyzed using the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Majorities of the 400 healthcare workers studied were nursing professionals (69.8%), worked in the Southeast region of Brazil (69.5%), were affiliated to a public healthcare institution (71.8%), and had a mean working week of 45.81 hours. The rate of psychological distress in the sample was 56.8%. There was no statistically significant association between the outcome and the type of organization (public/private). There were associations between psychological distress and professional category and between psychological distress and prior comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was evidence of impact on mental wellbeing irrespective of care level or setting. Psychological distress was one of the greatest challenges faced by the healthcare workers during the pandemic, irrespective of the type of institution, and was a phenomenon of relevance to occupational health in general during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":38694,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","volume":"22 3","pages":"e20241227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11595382/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological distress among public and private healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Giovanna Costa Guimarães, Gabrielle Silva Pereira, Helen Cristina Neves Trindade Rodrigues Dos Santos, Elaine Cristine da Conceição Vianna, Thaís Alencar Linhares Peixoto, João Silvestre Silva-Junior, Cristiane Helena Gallasch\",\"doi\":\"10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Healthcare workers in both the public and private systems were on the front line of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. As a consequence, they faced uncertainty, heavy demand, excessive working hours, and the fear of contracting the virus.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the occurrence of psychological distress among public and private healthcare workers at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational, quantitative study was conducted from April to June of 2020, enrolling workers who had cared for suspected and confirmed cases of covid-19 in Brazil. Psychological distress was assessed using the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20. Associations between the outcome and independent variables were analyzed using the chi-square test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Majorities of the 400 healthcare workers studied were nursing professionals (69.8%), worked in the Southeast region of Brazil (69.5%), were affiliated to a public healthcare institution (71.8%), and had a mean working week of 45.81 hours. The rate of psychological distress in the sample was 56.8%. There was no statistically significant association between the outcome and the type of organization (public/private). There were associations between psychological distress and professional category and between psychological distress and prior comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was evidence of impact on mental wellbeing irrespective of care level or setting. Psychological distress was one of the greatest challenges faced by the healthcare workers during the pandemic, irrespective of the type of institution, and was a phenomenon of relevance to occupational health in general during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"e20241227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11595382/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47626/1679-4435-2024-1227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:在抗击 COVID-19 大流行的斗争中,公共和私营系统的医护人员都站在第一线。因此,他们面临着不确定性、繁重的需求、超长的工作时间以及感染病毒的恐惧:调查 COVID-19 大流行初期公共和私营医疗工作者的心理困扰情况:2020 年 4 月至 6 月期间开展了一项观察性定量研究,研究对象为巴西曾护理过疑似和确诊 COVID-19 病例的医护人员。心理压力通过自我报告问卷-20进行评估。采用卡方检验分析了结果与自变量之间的关联:在研究的 400 名医护人员中,大多数是护理专业人员(69.8%),在巴西东南部地区工作(69.5%),隶属于公立医疗机构(71.8%),每周平均工作 45.81 小时。样本中存在心理困扰的比例为 56.8%。结果与机构类型(公立/私立)之间没有明显的统计学关联。心理困扰与专业类别之间存在关联,心理困扰与先前的合并症之间也存在关联:有证据表明,无论护理水平或环境如何,都会对心理健康产生影响。心理困扰是医护人员在大流行期间面临的最大挑战之一,与机构类型无关,也是大流行期间职业健康的一个普遍现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Psychological distress among public and private healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Psychological distress among public and private healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction: Healthcare workers in both the public and private systems were on the front line of the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic. As a consequence, they faced uncertainty, heavy demand, excessive working hours, and the fear of contracting the virus.

Objectives: To investigate the occurrence of psychological distress among public and private healthcare workers at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: An observational, quantitative study was conducted from April to June of 2020, enrolling workers who had cared for suspected and confirmed cases of covid-19 in Brazil. Psychological distress was assessed using the Self-Reporting Questionnaire-20. Associations between the outcome and independent variables were analyzed using the chi-square test.

Results: Majorities of the 400 healthcare workers studied were nursing professionals (69.8%), worked in the Southeast region of Brazil (69.5%), were affiliated to a public healthcare institution (71.8%), and had a mean working week of 45.81 hours. The rate of psychological distress in the sample was 56.8%. There was no statistically significant association between the outcome and the type of organization (public/private). There were associations between psychological distress and professional category and between psychological distress and prior comorbidities.

Conclusions: There was evidence of impact on mental wellbeing irrespective of care level or setting. Psychological distress was one of the greatest challenges faced by the healthcare workers during the pandemic, irrespective of the type of institution, and was a phenomenon of relevance to occupational health in general during the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho
Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Trabalho Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信