与前列腺癌风险有关的基因变异:全基因组关联研究的贝叶斯方法的领域概述和重新评估。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
André Victor Oliveira Monteiro, Naum Neves da Costa Dos Santos, Jonatan Pinho Rodrigues da Silva, Samuel Arcebispo Brasileiro, Juliana Campos Botelho, Luis Eduardo Rodrigues Sobreira, Alessandro Luiz Araújo Bentes Leal, Adenilson Leão Pereira, Ana Carolina Alves de Oliveira, José Rogério Souza Monteiro, Felipe Rodolfo Pereira da Silva
{"title":"与前列腺癌风险有关的基因变异:全基因组关联研究的贝叶斯方法的领域概述和重新评估。","authors":"André Victor Oliveira Monteiro, Naum Neves da Costa Dos Santos, Jonatan Pinho Rodrigues da Silva, Samuel Arcebispo Brasileiro, Juliana Campos Botelho, Luis Eduardo Rodrigues Sobreira, Alessandro Luiz Araújo Bentes Leal, Adenilson Leão Pereira, Ana Carolina Alves de Oliveira, José Rogério Souza Monteiro, Felipe Rodolfo Pereira da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is a complex disease influenced by many factors, with the genetic contribution for this neoplasia having a great role in its risk. The literature brings an increased number of Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS's) that attempt to elucidate the genetic associations with PCa. However, these genome studies have a considerable rate of false-positive data whose results may be biased. Therefore, we aimed to apply Bayesian approaches on significant associations among polymorphisms and PCa from GWAS's data. A literature search was performed for data published before April 20, 2024, whereby two investigators used a specific combination of keywords and Boolean operators in the search (\"prostate carcinoma or prostate cancer or PCa\" and \"polymorphism or genetic variation\" and \"Genome-Wide Association Study or GWAS\"). The records were retrieved, and the data were extracted with further application of two different Bayesian approaches: The False Positive Report Probability (FPRP) and the Bayesian False-Discovery Probability (BFDP), both at the prior probabilities of 10<sup>-3</sup> and 10<sup>-6</sup>. The data were considered as noteworthy at the level of FPRP <0.2 and BFDP <0.8. Besides, in-silico analyses by gene-gene network and gene enrichment were performed to evaluate the role of the noteworthy genes in PCa. As results, 13 GWAS's were included, with 2,520 values for FPRP and 1,368 values for BFDP being obtained. Our study showed an extensive number of gene variations as noteworthy candidate biomarkers for PCa risk, with highlighting for those occurred in the 8q24 locus and in the MSMB, ITGA6, SUN2, FGF10, INCENP, MLPH, and KLK3 genes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genetic variations related to the prostate cancer risk: A field synopsis and revaluation by Bayesian approaches of genome-wide association studies.\",\"authors\":\"André Victor Oliveira Monteiro, Naum Neves da Costa Dos Santos, Jonatan Pinho Rodrigues da Silva, Samuel Arcebispo Brasileiro, Juliana Campos Botelho, Luis Eduardo Rodrigues Sobreira, Alessandro Luiz Araújo Bentes Leal, Adenilson Leão Pereira, Ana Carolina Alves de Oliveira, José Rogério Souza Monteiro, Felipe Rodolfo Pereira da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prostate cancer (PCa) is a complex disease influenced by many factors, with the genetic contribution for this neoplasia having a great role in its risk. The literature brings an increased number of Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS's) that attempt to elucidate the genetic associations with PCa. However, these genome studies have a considerable rate of false-positive data whose results may be biased. Therefore, we aimed to apply Bayesian approaches on significant associations among polymorphisms and PCa from GWAS's data. A literature search was performed for data published before April 20, 2024, whereby two investigators used a specific combination of keywords and Boolean operators in the search (\\\"prostate carcinoma or prostate cancer or PCa\\\" and \\\"polymorphism or genetic variation\\\" and \\\"Genome-Wide Association Study or GWAS\\\"). The records were retrieved, and the data were extracted with further application of two different Bayesian approaches: The False Positive Report Probability (FPRP) and the Bayesian False-Discovery Probability (BFDP), both at the prior probabilities of 10<sup>-3</sup> and 10<sup>-6</sup>. The data were considered as noteworthy at the level of FPRP <0.2 and BFDP <0.8. Besides, in-silico analyses by gene-gene network and gene enrichment were performed to evaluate the role of the noteworthy genes in PCa. As results, 13 GWAS's were included, with 2,520 values for FPRP and 1,368 values for BFDP being obtained. Our study showed an extensive number of gene variations as noteworthy candidate biomarkers for PCa risk, with highlighting for those occurred in the 8q24 locus and in the MSMB, ITGA6, SUN2, FGF10, INCENP, MLPH, and KLK3 genes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.023\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.10.023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前列腺癌(PCa)是一种受多种因素影响的复杂疾病,遗传因素对这种肿瘤的发病风险有很大影响。文献中越来越多的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)试图阐明与 PCa 的遗传关联。然而,这些基因组研究存在相当高的假阳性数据率,其结果可能存在偏差。因此,我们旨在应用贝叶斯方法,从 GWAS 的数据中找出多态性与 PCa 之间的重要关联。我们对 2024 年 4 月 20 日之前发表的数据进行了文献检索,两位研究者在检索中使用了特定的关键词和布尔运算符组合("前列腺癌或前列腺癌或 PCa"、"多态性或遗传变异 "和 "全基因组关联研究或 GWAS")。在检索记录和提取数据时,进一步应用了两种不同的贝叶斯方法:假阳性报告概率(FPRP)和贝叶斯假发现概率(BFDP),两者的先验概率分别为 10-3 和 10-6。在 FPRP 的水平上,数据被认为是值得注意的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Genetic variations related to the prostate cancer risk: A field synopsis and revaluation by Bayesian approaches of genome-wide association studies.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a complex disease influenced by many factors, with the genetic contribution for this neoplasia having a great role in its risk. The literature brings an increased number of Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS's) that attempt to elucidate the genetic associations with PCa. However, these genome studies have a considerable rate of false-positive data whose results may be biased. Therefore, we aimed to apply Bayesian approaches on significant associations among polymorphisms and PCa from GWAS's data. A literature search was performed for data published before April 20, 2024, whereby two investigators used a specific combination of keywords and Boolean operators in the search ("prostate carcinoma or prostate cancer or PCa" and "polymorphism or genetic variation" and "Genome-Wide Association Study or GWAS"). The records were retrieved, and the data were extracted with further application of two different Bayesian approaches: The False Positive Report Probability (FPRP) and the Bayesian False-Discovery Probability (BFDP), both at the prior probabilities of 10-3 and 10-6. The data were considered as noteworthy at the level of FPRP <0.2 and BFDP <0.8. Besides, in-silico analyses by gene-gene network and gene enrichment were performed to evaluate the role of the noteworthy genes in PCa. As results, 13 GWAS's were included, with 2,520 values for FPRP and 1,368 values for BFDP being obtained. Our study showed an extensive number of gene variations as noteworthy candidate biomarkers for PCa risk, with highlighting for those occurred in the 8q24 locus and in the MSMB, ITGA6, SUN2, FGF10, INCENP, MLPH, and KLK3 genes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信