酰胺质子转移成像在预测宫颈癌宫旁浸润和淋巴管间隙浸润方面的价值。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Chongshuang Yang , Hasyma Abu Hassan , Nur Farhayu Omar , Tze Hui Soo , Ahmad Shuib Bin Yahaya , Tianliang Shi , Zhihong Qin , Min Wu , Jing Yang
{"title":"酰胺质子转移成像在预测宫颈癌宫旁浸润和淋巴管间隙浸润方面的价值。","authors":"Chongshuang Yang ,&nbsp;Hasyma Abu Hassan ,&nbsp;Nur Farhayu Omar ,&nbsp;Tze Hui Soo ,&nbsp;Ahmad Shuib Bin Yahaya ,&nbsp;Tianliang Shi ,&nbsp;Zhihong Qin ,&nbsp;Min Wu ,&nbsp;Jing Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.mri.2024.110282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the value of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing parametrial invasion (PMI) and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) of cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of cervical cancer patients diagnosed pathologically at our hospital from January 2021 to June 2024. All patients underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and APT imaging before treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and APT values were measured. Based on the pathological results, patients were categorized into LVSI (+) and LVSI (−) groups, and PMI (+) and PMI (−) groups. Independent sample <em>t</em>-tests were used to compare the ADC and APT values between these groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI and LVSI. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance among these measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 83 patients were included, with 56 in the LVSI (−) group, 27 in the LVSI (+) group, 35 in the PMI (−) group, and 16 in the PMI (+) group. The ADC values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly lower than those for the LVSI (−) and PMI (−) groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The APT values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly higher than those for the LVSI (−) and PMI (−) groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The AUC values for ADC, APT, and the combination of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI were 0.839, 0.788, and 0.880, respectively, and in predicting PMI were 0.770, 0.764, and 0.796, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the diagnostic performance of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI. However, the diagnostic performance of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI was significantly better than that of ADC and APT alone (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>APT imaging can predict LVSI and PMI status in cervical cancer before surgery. When combined with ADC, its diagnostic accuracy for predicting LVSI is higher than that of APT or ADC alone. This suggests a novel approach for assessing LVSI in cervical cancer.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18165,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic resonance imaging","volume":"116 ","pages":"Article 110282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of amide proton transfer imaging in predicting parametrial invasion and lymph-vascular space invasion of cervical cancer\",\"authors\":\"Chongshuang Yang ,&nbsp;Hasyma Abu Hassan ,&nbsp;Nur Farhayu Omar ,&nbsp;Tze Hui Soo ,&nbsp;Ahmad Shuib Bin Yahaya ,&nbsp;Tianliang Shi ,&nbsp;Zhihong Qin ,&nbsp;Min Wu ,&nbsp;Jing Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mri.2024.110282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To explore the value of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing parametrial invasion (PMI) and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) of cervical cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of cervical cancer patients diagnosed pathologically at our hospital from January 2021 to June 2024. All patients underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and APT imaging before treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and APT values were measured. Based on the pathological results, patients were categorized into LVSI (+) and LVSI (−) groups, and PMI (+) and PMI (−) groups. Independent sample <em>t</em>-tests were used to compare the ADC and APT values between these groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI and LVSI. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance among these measures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 83 patients were included, with 56 in the LVSI (−) group, 27 in the LVSI (+) group, 35 in the PMI (−) group, and 16 in the PMI (+) group. The ADC values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly lower than those for the LVSI (−) and PMI (−) groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The APT values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly higher than those for the LVSI (−) and PMI (−) groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). The AUC values for ADC, APT, and the combination of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI were 0.839, 0.788, and 0.880, respectively, and in predicting PMI were 0.770, 0.764, and 0.796, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the diagnostic performance of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI. However, the diagnostic performance of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI was significantly better than that of ADC and APT alone (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>APT imaging can predict LVSI and PMI status in cervical cancer before surgery. When combined with ADC, its diagnostic accuracy for predicting LVSI is higher than that of APT or ADC alone. This suggests a novel approach for assessing LVSI in cervical cancer.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"volume\":\"116 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic resonance imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24002637\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic resonance imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0730725X24002637","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨酰胺质子转移(APT)成像在评估宫旁侵犯(PMI)和淋巴管间隙侵犯(LVSI)方面的价值:探讨酰胺质子转移(APT)成像在评估宫颈癌宫旁侵犯(PMI)和淋巴管间隙侵犯(LVSI)中的价值:我们回顾性分析了2021年1月至2024年4月在我院进行病理诊断的宫颈癌患者的临床和影像学数据。所有患者在治疗前均接受了常规磁共振成像(MRI)、弥散加权成像(DWI)和 APT 成像检查。测量了表观弥散系数(ADC)和 APT 值。根据病理结果,将患者分为 LVSI (+) 组和 LVSI (-) 组,以及 PMI (+) 组和 PMI (-) 组。采用独立样本 t 检验比较这些组间的 ADC 和 APT 值。采用受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)评估 ADC、APT 和 ADC + APT 预测 PMI 和 LVSI 的灵敏度、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。德隆检验用于比较这些指标的诊断性能:共纳入 83 例患者,其中 LVSI(-)组 56 例,LVSI(+)组 27 例,PMI(-)组 35 例,PMI(+)组 16 例。LVSI(+)组和PMI(+)组的ADC值明显低于LVSI(-)组和PMI(-)组(P 结论:APT成像可预测LVSI(+)和PMI(-):APT 成像可在手术前预测宫颈癌的 LVSI 和 PMI 状态。与 ADC 联合使用时,其预测 LVSI 的诊断准确率高于 APT 或 ADC 单独使用时的诊断准确率。这为评估宫颈癌的 LVSI 提供了一种新方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of amide proton transfer imaging in predicting parametrial invasion and lymph-vascular space invasion of cervical cancer

Objective

To explore the value of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging in assessing parametrial invasion (PMI) and lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) of cervical cancer.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and imaging data of cervical cancer patients diagnosed pathologically at our hospital from January 2021 to June 2024. All patients underwent routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and APT imaging before treatment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and APT values were measured. Based on the pathological results, patients were categorized into LVSI (+) and LVSI (−) groups, and PMI (+) and PMI (−) groups. Independent sample t-tests were used to compare the ADC and APT values between these groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI and LVSI. The Delong test was employed to compare the diagnostic performance among these measures.

Results

A total of 83 patients were included, with 56 in the LVSI (−) group, 27 in the LVSI (+) group, 35 in the PMI (−) group, and 16 in the PMI (+) group. The ADC values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly lower than those for the LVSI (−) and PMI (−) groups (P < 0.01). The APT values for the LVSI (+) and PMI (+) groups were significantly higher than those for the LVSI (−) and PMI (−) groups (P < 0.01). The AUC values for ADC, APT, and the combination of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI were 0.839, 0.788, and 0.880, respectively, and in predicting PMI were 0.770, 0.764, and 0.796, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the diagnostic performance of ADC, APT, and ADC + APT in predicting PMI. However, the diagnostic performance of ADC + APT in predicting LVSI was significantly better than that of ADC and APT alone (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

APT imaging can predict LVSI and PMI status in cervical cancer before surgery. When combined with ADC, its diagnostic accuracy for predicting LVSI is higher than that of APT or ADC alone. This suggests a novel approach for assessing LVSI in cervical cancer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is the first international multidisciplinary journal encompassing physical, life, and clinical science investigations as they relate to the development and use of magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is dedicated to both basic research, technological innovation and applications, providing a single forum for communication among radiologists, physicists, chemists, biochemists, biologists, engineers, internists, pathologists, physiologists, computer scientists, and mathematicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信