Yongzhong Han , Qianmin Su , Liang Liu , Ying Li , Jihan Huang
{"title":"基于深度学习和医学文本挖掘的临床试验资格标准的结构分析和智能分类。","authors":"Yongzhong Han , Qianmin Su , Liang Liu , Ying Li , Jihan Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>To enhance the efficiency, quality, and innovation capability of clinical trials, this paper introduces a novel model called CTEC-AC (Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria Automatic Classification), aimed at structuring clinical trial eligibility criteria into computationally explainable classifications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We obtained detailed information on the latest 2,500 clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, generating over 20,000 eligibility criteria data entries. To enhance the expressiveness of these criteria, we integrated two powerful methods: ClinicalBERT and MetaMap. The resulting enhanced features were used as input for a hierarchical clustering algorithm. Post-processing included expert validation of the algorithm’s output to ensure the accuracy of the constructed annotated eligibility text corpus. Ultimately, our model was employed to automate the classification of eligibility criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We identified 31 distinct categories to summarize the eligibility criteria written by clinical researchers and uncovered common themes in how these criteria are expressed. Using our automated classification model on a labeled dataset, we achieved a macro-average F1 score of 0.94.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>This work can automatically extract structured representations from unstructured eligibility criteria text, significantly advancing the informatization of clinical trials. This, in turn, can significantly enhance the intelligence of automated participant recruitment for clinical researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 104753"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural analysis and intelligent classification of clinical trial eligibility criteria based on deep learning and medical text mining\",\"authors\":\"Yongzhong Han , Qianmin Su , Liang Liu , Ying Li , Jihan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective:</h3><div>To enhance the efficiency, quality, and innovation capability of clinical trials, this paper introduces a novel model called CTEC-AC (Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria Automatic Classification), aimed at structuring clinical trial eligibility criteria into computationally explainable classifications.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>We obtained detailed information on the latest 2,500 clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, generating over 20,000 eligibility criteria data entries. To enhance the expressiveness of these criteria, we integrated two powerful methods: ClinicalBERT and MetaMap. The resulting enhanced features were used as input for a hierarchical clustering algorithm. Post-processing included expert validation of the algorithm’s output to ensure the accuracy of the constructed annotated eligibility text corpus. Ultimately, our model was employed to automate the classification of eligibility criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>We identified 31 distinct categories to summarize the eligibility criteria written by clinical researchers and uncovered common themes in how these criteria are expressed. Using our automated classification model on a labeled dataset, we achieved a macro-average F1 score of 0.94.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><div>This work can automatically extract structured representations from unstructured eligibility criteria text, significantly advancing the informatization of clinical trials. This, in turn, can significantly enhance the intelligence of automated participant recruitment for clinical researchers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001710\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural analysis and intelligent classification of clinical trial eligibility criteria based on deep learning and medical text mining
Objective:
To enhance the efficiency, quality, and innovation capability of clinical trials, this paper introduces a novel model called CTEC-AC (Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria Automatic Classification), aimed at structuring clinical trial eligibility criteria into computationally explainable classifications.
Methods:
We obtained detailed information on the latest 2,500 clinical trials from ClinicalTrials.gov, generating over 20,000 eligibility criteria data entries. To enhance the expressiveness of these criteria, we integrated two powerful methods: ClinicalBERT and MetaMap. The resulting enhanced features were used as input for a hierarchical clustering algorithm. Post-processing included expert validation of the algorithm’s output to ensure the accuracy of the constructed annotated eligibility text corpus. Ultimately, our model was employed to automate the classification of eligibility criteria.
Results:
We identified 31 distinct categories to summarize the eligibility criteria written by clinical researchers and uncovered common themes in how these criteria are expressed. Using our automated classification model on a labeled dataset, we achieved a macro-average F1 score of 0.94.
Conclusion:
This work can automatically extract structured representations from unstructured eligibility criteria text, significantly advancing the informatization of clinical trials. This, in turn, can significantly enhance the intelligence of automated participant recruitment for clinical researchers.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.