Wang Wen, Wang Zhe, Chen Qianxiu, Sun Haixia, Fu Zongchao, Han Jing, Lv Hao
{"title":"与asfotase alfa相关的不良事件的比例分析:使用FDA不良事件报告系统进行的上市后研究。","authors":"Wang Wen, Wang Zhe, Chen Qianxiu, Sun Haixia, Fu Zongchao, Han Jing, Lv Hao","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2433566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asfotase alfa (AA) is an FDA-approved enzyme replacement therapy for hypophosphatasia (HPP). Limited real-world data on its adverse events (AEs) exist. This study evaluates AA-related AEs using the U.S. FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reports for AA were extracted from FAERS and analyzed per FDA guidelines. AEs were categorized using MedDRA version 26.1. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) algorithms. Time-to-onset (TTO) was calculated, with a Weibull shape parameter test to assess risk over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 13,702,373 reports, 5,040 AA-related AEs were identified, with 198 significant preferred terms (PTs). Common AEs included injection site reactions and pain, with additional PTs for ear/labyrinth disorders and infections. The median onset for 234 AEs with reported times was 170 days (IQR 18-390 days). No significant differences in AEs were found across gender or age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most AEs align with known data, but newly identified ear/labyrinth disorders and infections require further investigation to enhance AA's safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"435-443"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with asfotase alfa: a post-marketing study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.\",\"authors\":\"Wang Wen, Wang Zhe, Chen Qianxiu, Sun Haixia, Fu Zongchao, Han Jing, Lv Hao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2433566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Asfotase alfa (AA) is an FDA-approved enzyme replacement therapy for hypophosphatasia (HPP). Limited real-world data on its adverse events (AEs) exist. This study evaluates AA-related AEs using the U.S. FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Reports for AA were extracted from FAERS and analyzed per FDA guidelines. AEs were categorized using MedDRA version 26.1. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) algorithms. Time-to-onset (TTO) was calculated, with a Weibull shape parameter test to assess risk over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 13,702,373 reports, 5,040 AA-related AEs were identified, with 198 significant preferred terms (PTs). Common AEs included injection site reactions and pain, with additional PTs for ear/labyrinth disorders and infections. The median onset for 234 AEs with reported times was 170 days (IQR 18-390 days). No significant differences in AEs were found across gender or age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most AEs align with known data, but newly identified ear/labyrinth disorders and infections require further investigation to enhance AA's safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"435-443\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2433566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2433566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:阿斯福通α(AA)是美国食品及药物管理局批准的一种治疗低磷酸盐血症(HPP)的酶替代疗法。有关其不良事件(AEs)的真实世界数据有限。本研究利用美国 FDA 的不良事件报告系统 (FAERS) 数据库评估与 AA 相关的不良事件:方法:从 FAERS 中提取 AA 报告,并根据 FDA 指南进行分析。AE采用MedDRA 26.1版进行分类。使用报告几率比(ROR)、报告比例比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信度传播神经网络(BCPN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM)算法进行比例失调分析。计算了发病时间(TTO),并通过Weibull形状参数检验来评估随时间变化的风险:在 13,702,373 份报告中,确定了 5,040 例 AA 相关的 AE,其中有 198 个重要的首选术语 (PT)。常见的不良反应包括注射部位反应和疼痛,另外还有耳部/迷宫失调和感染的不良反应。234 种 AE 的中位发病时间为 170 天(IQR 18-390 天)。不同性别或年龄组的 AEs 无明显差异:大多数 AE 与已知数据一致,但新发现的耳部/迷宫疾病和感染需要进一步调查,以提高 AA 的安全性。
Disproportionality analysis of adverse events associated with asfotase alfa: a post-marketing study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.
Background: Asfotase alfa (AA) is an FDA-approved enzyme replacement therapy for hypophosphatasia (HPP). Limited real-world data on its adverse events (AEs) exist. This study evaluates AA-related AEs using the U.S. FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
Methods: Reports for AA were extracted from FAERS and analyzed per FDA guidelines. AEs were categorized using MedDRA version 26.1. Disproportionality analysis was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM) algorithms. Time-to-onset (TTO) was calculated, with a Weibull shape parameter test to assess risk over time.
Results: Out of 13,702,373 reports, 5,040 AA-related AEs were identified, with 198 significant preferred terms (PTs). Common AEs included injection site reactions and pain, with additional PTs for ear/labyrinth disorders and infections. The median onset for 234 AEs with reported times was 170 days (IQR 18-390 days). No significant differences in AEs were found across gender or age groups.
Conclusion: Most AEs align with known data, but newly identified ear/labyrinth disorders and infections require further investigation to enhance AA's safety profile.
期刊介绍:
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports.
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.