{"title":"利用内窥镜超声波检查和放大色内窥镜检查估算早期结直肠癌的浸润深度:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Runhua Chen, Yafang Huang, Fusheng Liu","doi":"10.1159/000542620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are often used as diagnostic tools to estimate the depth of invasion in early colorectal cancers (CRCs). The aim of this study was to compare MCE with EUS in distinguishing between slight submucosal invasion (invasion depth <1,000 μm) and massively submucosal invasion in patients with early CRCs, since slight submucosal invasion is currently considered as an indication for endoscopic resection and submucosal cancer with massively submucosal invasion should be surgically treated due to an increased risk of lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this meta-analysis, relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases between the time of the establishment and April 2023. Data on the yield of tumors were extracted, pooled, and analyzed by STATA15.0 software. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio in differentiating massive submucosal invasion from slight submucosal invasion were calculated for both diagnostic modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies involving 12,586 lesions were included: sixteen were studies on MCE and 7 were studies on EUS and 3 were studies on both MCE and EUS. The pooled sensitivity of MCE was 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83), the specificity was 0.95 (0.95% CI 0.91-0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 15.4 (0.95% CI 8.7-27.4), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.23 (0.95% CI 0.18-0.30). The pooled sensitivity of EUS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), the specificity was 0.87 (0.95% CI 0.80-0.91), the positive likelihood ratio was 6.7 (0.95% CI 4.4-10.3), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.13 (0.95% CI 0.08-0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensitivity tended to be higher in EUS than MCE for early CRCs with massively submucosal invasion, whereas the specificity was significantly lower in EUS than in MCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11315,"journal":{"name":"Digestion","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation of Invasion Depth of Early Colorectal Cancer Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Magnifying Chromoendoscopy: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Runhua Chen, Yafang Huang, Fusheng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are often used as diagnostic tools to estimate the depth of invasion in early colorectal cancers (CRCs). The aim of this study was to compare MCE with EUS in distinguishing between slight submucosal invasion (invasion depth <1,000 μm) and massively submucosal invasion in patients with early CRCs, since slight submucosal invasion is currently considered as an indication for endoscopic resection and submucosal cancer with massively submucosal invasion should be surgically treated due to an increased risk of lymph node metastasis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this meta-analysis, relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases between the time of the establishment and April 2023. Data on the yield of tumors were extracted, pooled, and analyzed by STATA15.0 software. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio in differentiating massive submucosal invasion from slight submucosal invasion were calculated for both diagnostic modalities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies involving 12,586 lesions were included: sixteen were studies on MCE and 7 were studies on EUS and 3 were studies on both MCE and EUS. The pooled sensitivity of MCE was 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83), the specificity was 0.95 (0.95% CI 0.91-0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 15.4 (0.95% CI 8.7-27.4), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.23 (0.95% CI 0.18-0.30). The pooled sensitivity of EUS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), the specificity was 0.87 (0.95% CI 0.80-0.91), the positive likelihood ratio was 6.7 (0.95% CI 4.4-10.3), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.13 (0.95% CI 0.08-0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sensitivity tended to be higher in EUS than MCE for early CRCs with massively submucosal invasion, whereas the specificity was significantly lower in EUS than in MCE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542620\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542620","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:放大色内镜(MCE)和内镜超声检查(EUS)通常被用作诊断工具,以估计早期结直肠癌(CRC)的侵犯深度。本研究的目的是比较 MCE 和 EUS 在区分轻微粘膜下侵犯(侵犯深度
Estimation of Invasion Depth of Early Colorectal Cancer Using Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Magnifying Chromoendoscopy: A Meta-Analysis.
Introduction: Magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are often used as diagnostic tools to estimate the depth of invasion in early colorectal cancers (CRCs). The aim of this study was to compare MCE with EUS in distinguishing between slight submucosal invasion (invasion depth <1,000 μm) and massively submucosal invasion in patients with early CRCs, since slight submucosal invasion is currently considered as an indication for endoscopic resection and submucosal cancer with massively submucosal invasion should be surgically treated due to an increased risk of lymph node metastasis.
Methods: For this meta-analysis, relevant studies were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases between the time of the establishment and April 2023. Data on the yield of tumors were extracted, pooled, and analyzed by STATA15.0 software. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio in differentiating massive submucosal invasion from slight submucosal invasion were calculated for both diagnostic modalities.
Results: Twenty-six studies involving 12,586 lesions were included: sixteen were studies on MCE and 7 were studies on EUS and 3 were studies on both MCE and EUS. The pooled sensitivity of MCE was 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.83), the specificity was 0.95 (0.95% CI 0.91-0.97), the positive likelihood ratio was 15.4 (0.95% CI 8.7-27.4), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.23 (0.95% CI 0.18-0.30). The pooled sensitivity of EUS was 0.88 (95% CI 0.81-0.93), the specificity was 0.87 (0.95% CI 0.80-0.91), the positive likelihood ratio was 6.7 (0.95% CI 4.4-10.3), and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.13 (0.95% CI 0.08-0.23).
Conclusion: The sensitivity tended to be higher in EUS than MCE for early CRCs with massively submucosal invasion, whereas the specificity was significantly lower in EUS than in MCE.
期刊介绍:
''Digestion'' concentrates on clinical research reports: in addition to editorials and reviews, the journal features sections on Stomach/Esophagus, Bowel, Neuro-Gastroenterology, Liver/Bile, Pancreas, Metabolism/Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Oncology. Papers cover physiology in humans, metabolic studies and clinical work on the etiology, diagnosis, and therapy of human diseases. It is thus especially cut out for gastroenterologists employed in hospitals and outpatient units. Moreover, the journal''s coverage of studies on the metabolism and effects of therapeutic drugs carries considerable value for clinicians and investigators beyond the immediate field of gastroenterology.