对长期膀胱炎(膀胱炎后遗症)的干预:生活系统综述。

IF 105.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Dena Zeraatkar, Michael Ling, Sarah Kirsh, Tanvir Jassal, Mahnoor Shahab, Hamed Movahed, Jhalok Ronjan Talukdar, Alicia Walch, Samantha Chakraborty, Tari Turner, Lyn Turkstra, Roger S McIntyre, Ariel Izcovich, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Thomas Agoritsas, Signe A Flottorp, Paul Garner, Tyler Pitre, Rachel J Couban, Jason W Busse
{"title":"对长期膀胱炎(膀胱炎后遗症)的干预:生活系统综述。","authors":"Dena Zeraatkar, Michael Ling, Sarah Kirsh, Tanvir Jassal, Mahnoor Shahab, Hamed Movahed, Jhalok Ronjan Talukdar, Alicia Walch, Samantha Chakraborty, Tari Turner, Lyn Turkstra, Roger S McIntyre, Ariel Izcovich, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Thomas Agoritsas, Signe A Flottorp, Paul Garner, Tyler Pitre, Rachel J Couban, Jason W Busse","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-081318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of interventions for the management of long covid (post-covid condition).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Living systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Trials that randomised adults (≥18 years) with long covid to drug or non-drug interventions, placebo or sham, or usual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 trials with 3695 patients were eligible. Four trials (n=708 patients) investigated drug interventions, eight (n=985) physical activity or rehabilitation, three (n=314) behavioural, four (n=794) dietary, four (n=309) medical devices and technologies, and one (n=585) a combination of physical exercise and mental health rehabilitation. Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online programme of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) probably reduces fatigue (mean difference -8.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.11 to -3.69; Checklist for Individual Strength fatigue subscale; range 8-56, higher scores indicate greater impairment) and probably improves concentration (mean difference -5.2, -7.97 to -2.43; Checklist for Individual Strength concentration problems subscale; range 4-28; higher scores indicate greater impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online, supervised, combined physical and mental health rehabilitation programme probably leads to improvement in overall health, with an estimated 161 more patients per 1000 (95% CI 61 more to 292 more) experiencing meaningful improvement or recovery, probably reduces symptoms of depression (mean difference -1.50, -2.41 to -0.59; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale; range 0-21; higher scores indicate greater impairment), and probably improves quality of life (0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.08; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29+2 Profile; range -0.022-1; higher scores indicate less impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that intermittent aerobic exercise 3-5 times weekly for 4-6 weeks probably improves physical function compared with continuous exercise (mean difference 3.8, 1.12 to 6.48; SF-36 physical component summary score; range 0-100; higher scores indicate less impairment). No compelling evidence was found to support the effectiveness of other interventions, including, among others, vortioxetine, leronlimab, combined probiotics-prebiotics, coenzyme Q10, amygdala and insula retraining, combined L-arginine and vitamin C, inspiratory muscle training, transcranial direct current stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen, a mobile application providing education on long covid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate certainty evidence suggests that CBT and physical and mental health rehabilitation probably improve symptoms of long covid.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9h7zm/.</p><p><strong>Readers' note: </strong>This article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":9201,"journal":{"name":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","volume":"387 ","pages":"e081318"},"PeriodicalIF":105.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600537/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions for the management of long covid (post-covid condition): living systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Dena Zeraatkar, Michael Ling, Sarah Kirsh, Tanvir Jassal, Mahnoor Shahab, Hamed Movahed, Jhalok Ronjan Talukdar, Alicia Walch, Samantha Chakraborty, Tari Turner, Lyn Turkstra, Roger S McIntyre, Ariel Izcovich, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Thomas Agoritsas, Signe A Flottorp, Paul Garner, Tyler Pitre, Rachel J Couban, Jason W Busse\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj-2024-081318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of interventions for the management of long covid (post-covid condition).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Living systematic review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Trials that randomised adults (≥18 years) with long covid to drug or non-drug interventions, placebo or sham, or usual care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>24 trials with 3695 patients were eligible. Four trials (n=708 patients) investigated drug interventions, eight (n=985) physical activity or rehabilitation, three (n=314) behavioural, four (n=794) dietary, four (n=309) medical devices and technologies, and one (n=585) a combination of physical exercise and mental health rehabilitation. Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online programme of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) probably reduces fatigue (mean difference -8.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.11 to -3.69; Checklist for Individual Strength fatigue subscale; range 8-56, higher scores indicate greater impairment) and probably improves concentration (mean difference -5.2, -7.97 to -2.43; Checklist for Individual Strength concentration problems subscale; range 4-28; higher scores indicate greater impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online, supervised, combined physical and mental health rehabilitation programme probably leads to improvement in overall health, with an estimated 161 more patients per 1000 (95% CI 61 more to 292 more) experiencing meaningful improvement or recovery, probably reduces symptoms of depression (mean difference -1.50, -2.41 to -0.59; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale; range 0-21; higher scores indicate greater impairment), and probably improves quality of life (0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.08; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29+2 Profile; range -0.022-1; higher scores indicate less impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that intermittent aerobic exercise 3-5 times weekly for 4-6 weeks probably improves physical function compared with continuous exercise (mean difference 3.8, 1.12 to 6.48; SF-36 physical component summary score; range 0-100; higher scores indicate less impairment). No compelling evidence was found to support the effectiveness of other interventions, including, among others, vortioxetine, leronlimab, combined probiotics-prebiotics, coenzyme Q10, amygdala and insula retraining, combined L-arginine and vitamin C, inspiratory muscle training, transcranial direct current stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen, a mobile application providing education on long covid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Moderate certainty evidence suggests that CBT and physical and mental health rehabilitation probably improve symptoms of long covid.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9h7zm/.</p><p><strong>Readers' note: </strong>This article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ : British Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"387 \",\"pages\":\"e081318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":105.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600537/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ : British Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081318\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较长期膀胱炎(膀胱炎后遗症)干预措施的有效性:数据来源:Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Allied and Complementary Review:数据来源:Medline、Embase、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Allied and Complementary Medicine Database 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials(从开始到 2023 年 12 月):结果:24 项试验(3695 名患者)符合条件。4项试验(样本数=708名患者)研究了药物干预,8项试验(样本数=985名患者)研究了体育锻炼或康复,3项试验(样本数=314名患者)研究了行为干预,4项试验(样本数=794名患者)研究了饮食干预,4项试验(样本数=309名患者)研究了医疗设备和技术,1项试验(样本数=585名患者)研究了体育锻炼和心理健康康复的结合。中度确定性证据表明,与常规护理相比,认知行为疗法(CBT)在线计划可能会减轻疲劳(平均差异为-8.4,95%置信区间(CI)为-13.11至-3.69;个人强度疲劳子量表;范围为8-56,得分越高表明受损越严重),并可能会提高注意力(平均差异为-5.2,-7.97至-2.43;个人强度注意力问题子量表;范围为4-28;得分越高表明受损越严重)。中度确定性证据表明,与常规护理相比,在线监督的身心健康综合康复计划可能会改善总体健康状况,估计每 1000 名患者中会有 161 人(95% CI 61 人至 292 人)的健康状况得到有意义的改善或恢复,可能会减轻抑郁症状(平均差异-1.50,-2.41 至 -0.59;医院焦虑和抑郁量表抑郁分量表;范围 0-21;得分越高表明受损越严重),并可能改善生活质量(0.04,95% CI 0.00 至 0.08;患者报告结果测量信息系统 29+2 资料;范围 -0.022-1;得分越高表明受损越轻)。中度确定性证据表明,与持续运动相比,每周 3-5 次、持续 4-6 周的间歇性有氧运动可能会改善身体功能(平均差异为 3.8,1.12 至 6.48;SF-36 身体成分总分;范围为 0-100;分数越高,表明受损程度越轻)。没有发现令人信服的证据支持其他干预措施的有效性,其中包括伏替西汀、利龙利单抗、益生菌-益生元组合、辅酶Q10、杏仁核和岛叶再训练、左旋精氨酸和维生素C组合、吸气肌训练、经颅直流电刺激、高压氧、提供长效氯维酮教育的移动应用程序等:中度确定性证据表明,CBT 和身心健康康复可能会改善长颈伏牛症的症状:开放科学框架 https://osf.io/9h7zm/.Readers' note: 本文是一篇动态系统综述,将根据新出现的证据进行更新。自最初发表之日起两年内均可进行更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventions for the management of long covid (post-covid condition): living systematic review.

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of interventions for the management of long covid (post-covid condition).

Design: Living systematic review.

Data sources: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to December 2023.

Eligibility criteria: Trials that randomised adults (≥18 years) with long covid to drug or non-drug interventions, placebo or sham, or usual care.

Results: 24 trials with 3695 patients were eligible. Four trials (n=708 patients) investigated drug interventions, eight (n=985) physical activity or rehabilitation, three (n=314) behavioural, four (n=794) dietary, four (n=309) medical devices and technologies, and one (n=585) a combination of physical exercise and mental health rehabilitation. Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online programme of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) probably reduces fatigue (mean difference -8.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.11 to -3.69; Checklist for Individual Strength fatigue subscale; range 8-56, higher scores indicate greater impairment) and probably improves concentration (mean difference -5.2, -7.97 to -2.43; Checklist for Individual Strength concentration problems subscale; range 4-28; higher scores indicate greater impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that, compared with usual care, an online, supervised, combined physical and mental health rehabilitation programme probably leads to improvement in overall health, with an estimated 161 more patients per 1000 (95% CI 61 more to 292 more) experiencing meaningful improvement or recovery, probably reduces symptoms of depression (mean difference -1.50, -2.41 to -0.59; Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression subscale; range 0-21; higher scores indicate greater impairment), and probably improves quality of life (0.04, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.08; Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System 29+2 Profile; range -0.022-1; higher scores indicate less impairment). Moderate certainty evidence suggested that intermittent aerobic exercise 3-5 times weekly for 4-6 weeks probably improves physical function compared with continuous exercise (mean difference 3.8, 1.12 to 6.48; SF-36 physical component summary score; range 0-100; higher scores indicate less impairment). No compelling evidence was found to support the effectiveness of other interventions, including, among others, vortioxetine, leronlimab, combined probiotics-prebiotics, coenzyme Q10, amygdala and insula retraining, combined L-arginine and vitamin C, inspiratory muscle training, transcranial direct current stimulation, hyperbaric oxygen, a mobile application providing education on long covid.

Conclusion: Moderate certainty evidence suggests that CBT and physical and mental health rehabilitation probably improve symptoms of long covid.

Systematic review registration: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/9h7zm/.

Readers' note: This article is a living systematic review that will be updated to reflect emerging evidence. Updates may occur for up to two years from the date of original publication.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ : British Medical Journal
BMJ : British Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
2997
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer-reviewed medical journal with a "continuous publication" model, where articles are published on bmj.com before appearing in the print journal. The website is updated daily with the latest original research, education, news, and comment articles, along with podcasts, videos, and blogs. The BMJ's editorial team is primarily located in London, with additional editors in Europe, the US, and India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信