当代更年期荷尔蒙疗法与心血管疾病风险:基于瑞典全国登记册的模拟目标试验。

IF 105.7 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Therese Johansson, Torgny Karlsson, Dana Bliuc, Daniel Schmitz, Weronica E Ek, Alkistis Skalkidou, Jacqueline R Center, Åsa Johansson
{"title":"当代更年期荷尔蒙疗法与心血管疾病风险:基于瑞典全国登记册的模拟目标试验。","authors":"Therese Johansson, Torgny Karlsson, Dana Bliuc, Daniel Schmitz, Weronica E Ek, Alkistis Skalkidou, Jacqueline R Center, Åsa Johansson","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2023-078784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of contemporary menopausal hormone therapy on the risk of cardiovascular disease according to the route of administration and combination of hormones.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nationwide register based emulated target trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Swedish national registries.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>919 614 women aged 50-58 between 2007 and 2020 without hormone therapy use in the previous two years, identified from the Swedish population.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>138 nested trials were designed, starting each month from July 2007 until December 2018. Using the prescription registry data for that specific month, women who had not used hormone therapy in the previous two years were assigned to one of eight treatment groups: oral combined continuous, oral combined sequential, oral unopposed oestrogen, oral oestrogen with local progestin, tibolone, transdermal combined, transdermal unopposed oestrogen, or non-initiators of menopausal hormone therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for venous thromboembolism, as well as for ischaemic heart disease, cerebral infarction, and myocardial infarction separately and as a composite cardiovascular disease outcome. Treatment effects were estimated by contrasting initiators and non-initiators in observational analogues to \"intention-to-treat\" analyses and continuous users versus never users in \"per protocol\" analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 512 women were initiators of any menopausal hormone therapy and 842 102 women were non-initiators. 24 089 women had an event recorded during the follow-up: 10 360 (43.0%) had an ischaemic heart disease event, 4098 (17.0%) had a cerebral infarction event, 4312 (17.9%) had a myocardial infarction event, and 9196 (38.2%) had a venous thromboembolic event. In intention-to-treat analyses, tibolone was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.08) compared with non-initiators. Initiators of tibolone or oral oestrogen-progestin therapy had a higher risk of ischaemic heart disease (1.46 (1.00 to 2.14) and 1.21 (1.00 to 1.46), respectively). A higher risk of venous thromboembolism was observed for oral continuous oestrogen-progestin therapy (1.61, 1.35 to 1.92), sequential therapy (2.00, 1.61 to 2.49), and oestrogen-only therapy (1.57, 1.02 to 2.44). Additional results in per protocol analyses showed that use of tibolone was associated with a higher risk of cerebral infarction (1.97, 1.02 to 3.78) and myocardial infarction (1.94, 1.01 to 3.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of oral oestrogen-progestin therapy was associated with an increased risk of heart disease and venous thromboembolism, whereas the use of tibolone was associated with an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease, cerebral infarction, and myocardial infarction but not venous thromboembolism. These findings highlight the diverse effects of different hormone combinations and administration methods on the risk of cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":9201,"journal":{"name":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","volume":"387 ","pages":"e078784"},"PeriodicalIF":105.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary menopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease: Swedish nationwide register based emulated target trial.\",\"authors\":\"Therese Johansson, Torgny Karlsson, Dana Bliuc, Daniel Schmitz, Weronica E Ek, Alkistis Skalkidou, Jacqueline R Center, Åsa Johansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmj-2023-078784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the effect of contemporary menopausal hormone therapy on the risk of cardiovascular disease according to the route of administration and combination of hormones.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Nationwide register based emulated target trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Swedish national registries.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>919 614 women aged 50-58 between 2007 and 2020 without hormone therapy use in the previous two years, identified from the Swedish population.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>138 nested trials were designed, starting each month from July 2007 until December 2018. Using the prescription registry data for that specific month, women who had not used hormone therapy in the previous two years were assigned to one of eight treatment groups: oral combined continuous, oral combined sequential, oral unopposed oestrogen, oral oestrogen with local progestin, tibolone, transdermal combined, transdermal unopposed oestrogen, or non-initiators of menopausal hormone therapy.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for venous thromboembolism, as well as for ischaemic heart disease, cerebral infarction, and myocardial infarction separately and as a composite cardiovascular disease outcome. Treatment effects were estimated by contrasting initiators and non-initiators in observational analogues to \\\"intention-to-treat\\\" analyses and continuous users versus never users in \\\"per protocol\\\" analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 77 512 women were initiators of any menopausal hormone therapy and 842 102 women were non-initiators. 24 089 women had an event recorded during the follow-up: 10 360 (43.0%) had an ischaemic heart disease event, 4098 (17.0%) had a cerebral infarction event, 4312 (17.9%) had a myocardial infarction event, and 9196 (38.2%) had a venous thromboembolic event. In intention-to-treat analyses, tibolone was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.08) compared with non-initiators. Initiators of tibolone or oral oestrogen-progestin therapy had a higher risk of ischaemic heart disease (1.46 (1.00 to 2.14) and 1.21 (1.00 to 1.46), respectively). A higher risk of venous thromboembolism was observed for oral continuous oestrogen-progestin therapy (1.61, 1.35 to 1.92), sequential therapy (2.00, 1.61 to 2.49), and oestrogen-only therapy (1.57, 1.02 to 2.44). Additional results in per protocol analyses showed that use of tibolone was associated with a higher risk of cerebral infarction (1.97, 1.02 to 3.78) and myocardial infarction (1.94, 1.01 to 3.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of oral oestrogen-progestin therapy was associated with an increased risk of heart disease and venous thromboembolism, whereas the use of tibolone was associated with an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease, cerebral infarction, and myocardial infarction but not venous thromboembolism. These findings highlight the diverse effects of different hormone combinations and administration methods on the risk of cardiovascular disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ : British Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"387 \",\"pages\":\"e078784\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":105.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11600536/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ : British Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078784\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ : British Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2023-078784","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估更年期激素治疗对心血管疾病风险的影响:根据给药途径和激素组合,评估当代更年期激素疗法对心血管疾病风险的影响:设计:基于全国登记的模拟目标试验:参与者:919 614 名年龄在 2007 年至 2020 年之间的 50-58 岁女性,她们在过去两年中未使用过激素治疗:设计了 138 项嵌套试验,从 2007 年 7 月至 2018 年 12 月每月开始。利用该月的处方登记数据,将前两年未使用激素治疗的女性分配到八个治疗组中的一组:口服联合连续治疗组、口服联合序贯治疗组、口服无对抗雌激素治疗组、口服雌激素加局部孕激素治疗组、替勃龙治疗组、透皮联合治疗组、透皮无对抗雌激素治疗组或未开始绝经激素治疗组:估算了静脉血栓栓塞、缺血性心脏病、脑梗塞和心肌梗塞的危险比及95%置信区间,并将其分别作为心血管疾病的综合结果。在类似于 "意向治疗 "分析的观察性分析中,通过对比开始治疗者和未开始治疗者,以及在 "按方案 "分析中对比连续使用者和从未使用者,来估计治疗效果:共有 77 512 名妇女开始接受任何绝经激素治疗,842 102 名妇女未开始接受治疗。24 089 名妇女在随访期间发生了事件:10 360 人(43.0%)发生了缺血性心脏病事件,4098 人(17.0%)发生了脑梗塞事件,4312 人(17.9%)发生了心肌梗塞事件,9196 人(38.2%)发生了静脉血栓栓塞事件。在意向治疗分析中,与非初始治疗者相比,替勃龙与心血管疾病风险增加有关(危险比 1.52,95% 置信区间 1.11 至 2.08)。开始使用替勃龙或口服雌激素-孕激素疗法的患者罹患缺血性心脏病的风险更高(分别为 1.46(1.00 至 2.14)和 1.21(1.00 至 1.46))。口服连续雌激素-孕激素疗法(1.61,1.35 至 1.92)、序贯疗法(2.00,1.61 至 2.49)和纯雌激素疗法(1.57,1.02 至 2.44)的静脉血栓栓塞风险较高。按方案分析的其他结果显示,使用替勃龙与较高的脑梗塞(1.97,1.02 至 3.78)和心肌梗塞(1.94,1.01 至 3.73)风险有关:使用口服雌激素-孕激素疗法与心脏病和静脉血栓栓塞风险增加有关,而使用替勃龙与缺血性心脏病、脑梗塞和心肌梗塞风险增加有关,但与静脉血栓栓塞无关。这些发现凸显了不同激素组合和给药方法对心血管疾病风险的不同影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary menopausal hormone therapy and risk of cardiovascular disease: Swedish nationwide register based emulated target trial.

Objective: To assess the effect of contemporary menopausal hormone therapy on the risk of cardiovascular disease according to the route of administration and combination of hormones.

Design: Nationwide register based emulated target trial.

Setting: Swedish national registries.

Participants: 919 614 women aged 50-58 between 2007 and 2020 without hormone therapy use in the previous two years, identified from the Swedish population.

Interventions: 138 nested trials were designed, starting each month from July 2007 until December 2018. Using the prescription registry data for that specific month, women who had not used hormone therapy in the previous two years were assigned to one of eight treatment groups: oral combined continuous, oral combined sequential, oral unopposed oestrogen, oral oestrogen with local progestin, tibolone, transdermal combined, transdermal unopposed oestrogen, or non-initiators of menopausal hormone therapy.

Main outcome measures: Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated for venous thromboembolism, as well as for ischaemic heart disease, cerebral infarction, and myocardial infarction separately and as a composite cardiovascular disease outcome. Treatment effects were estimated by contrasting initiators and non-initiators in observational analogues to "intention-to-treat" analyses and continuous users versus never users in "per protocol" analyses.

Results: A total of 77 512 women were initiators of any menopausal hormone therapy and 842 102 women were non-initiators. 24 089 women had an event recorded during the follow-up: 10 360 (43.0%) had an ischaemic heart disease event, 4098 (17.0%) had a cerebral infarction event, 4312 (17.9%) had a myocardial infarction event, and 9196 (38.2%) had a venous thromboembolic event. In intention-to-treat analyses, tibolone was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.11 to 2.08) compared with non-initiators. Initiators of tibolone or oral oestrogen-progestin therapy had a higher risk of ischaemic heart disease (1.46 (1.00 to 2.14) and 1.21 (1.00 to 1.46), respectively). A higher risk of venous thromboembolism was observed for oral continuous oestrogen-progestin therapy (1.61, 1.35 to 1.92), sequential therapy (2.00, 1.61 to 2.49), and oestrogen-only therapy (1.57, 1.02 to 2.44). Additional results in per protocol analyses showed that use of tibolone was associated with a higher risk of cerebral infarction (1.97, 1.02 to 3.78) and myocardial infarction (1.94, 1.01 to 3.73).

Conclusions: Use of oral oestrogen-progestin therapy was associated with an increased risk of heart disease and venous thromboembolism, whereas the use of tibolone was associated with an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease, cerebral infarction, and myocardial infarction but not venous thromboembolism. These findings highlight the diverse effects of different hormone combinations and administration methods on the risk of cardiovascular disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ : British Medical Journal
BMJ : British Medical Journal Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
19.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
2997
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The BMJ (British Medical Journal) is an international peer-reviewed medical journal with a "continuous publication" model, where articles are published on bmj.com before appearing in the print journal. The website is updated daily with the latest original research, education, news, and comment articles, along with podcasts, videos, and blogs. The BMJ's editorial team is primarily located in London, with additional editors in Europe, the US, and India.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信