Daniel Possti, Shani Oz, Aaron Gerston, Danielle Wasserman, Iain Duncan, Matteo Cesari, Andrew Dagay, Riva Tauman, Anat Mirelman, Yael Hanein
{"title":"在自然睡眠环境中对无失眠的快速眼动睡眠进行半自动量化","authors":"Daniel Possti, Shani Oz, Aaron Gerston, Danielle Wasserman, Iain Duncan, Matteo Cesari, Andrew Dagay, Riva Tauman, Anat Mirelman, Yael Hanein","doi":"10.1038/s41746-024-01354-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polysomnography, the gold standard diagnostic tool in sleep medicine, is performed in an artificial environment. This might alter sleep and may not accurately reflect typical sleep patterns. While macro-structures are sensitive to environmental effects, micro-structures remain more stable. In this study we applied semi-automated algorithms to capture REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) and sleep spindles, comparing lab and home measurements. We analyzed 107 full-night recordings from 55 subjects: 24 healthy adults, 28 Parkinson’s disease patients (15 RBD), and three with isolated Rem sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Sessions were manually scored. An automatic algorithm for quantifying RSWA was developed and tested against manual scoring. RSWAi showed a 60% correlation between home and lab. RBD detection achieved 83% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 81% balanced accuracy. The algorithm accurately quantified RSWA, enabling the detection of RBD patients. These findings could facilitate more accessible sleep testing, and provide a possible alternative for screening RBD.","PeriodicalId":19349,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Digital Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01354-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semi automatic quantification of REM sleep without atonia in natural sleep environment\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Possti, Shani Oz, Aaron Gerston, Danielle Wasserman, Iain Duncan, Matteo Cesari, Andrew Dagay, Riva Tauman, Anat Mirelman, Yael Hanein\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41746-024-01354-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polysomnography, the gold standard diagnostic tool in sleep medicine, is performed in an artificial environment. This might alter sleep and may not accurately reflect typical sleep patterns. While macro-structures are sensitive to environmental effects, micro-structures remain more stable. In this study we applied semi-automated algorithms to capture REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) and sleep spindles, comparing lab and home measurements. We analyzed 107 full-night recordings from 55 subjects: 24 healthy adults, 28 Parkinson’s disease patients (15 RBD), and three with isolated Rem sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Sessions were manually scored. An automatic algorithm for quantifying RSWA was developed and tested against manual scoring. RSWAi showed a 60% correlation between home and lab. RBD detection achieved 83% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 81% balanced accuracy. The algorithm accurately quantified RSWA, enabling the detection of RBD patients. These findings could facilitate more accessible sleep testing, and provide a possible alternative for screening RBD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01354-8.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Digital Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01354-8\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Digital Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-024-01354-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Semi automatic quantification of REM sleep without atonia in natural sleep environment
Polysomnography, the gold standard diagnostic tool in sleep medicine, is performed in an artificial environment. This might alter sleep and may not accurately reflect typical sleep patterns. While macro-structures are sensitive to environmental effects, micro-structures remain more stable. In this study we applied semi-automated algorithms to capture REM sleep without atonia (RSWA) and sleep spindles, comparing lab and home measurements. We analyzed 107 full-night recordings from 55 subjects: 24 healthy adults, 28 Parkinson’s disease patients (15 RBD), and three with isolated Rem sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Sessions were manually scored. An automatic algorithm for quantifying RSWA was developed and tested against manual scoring. RSWAi showed a 60% correlation between home and lab. RBD detection achieved 83% sensitivity, 79% specificity, and 81% balanced accuracy. The algorithm accurately quantified RSWA, enabling the detection of RBD patients. These findings could facilitate more accessible sleep testing, and provide a possible alternative for screening RBD.
期刊介绍:
npj Digital Medicine is an online open-access journal that focuses on publishing peer-reviewed research in the field of digital medicine. The journal covers various aspects of digital medicine, including the application and implementation of digital and mobile technologies in clinical settings, virtual healthcare, and the use of artificial intelligence and informatics.
The primary goal of the journal is to support innovation and the advancement of healthcare through the integration of new digital and mobile technologies. When determining if a manuscript is suitable for publication, the journal considers four important criteria: novelty, clinical relevance, scientific rigor, and digital innovation.