欧洲手外科通用的患者报告结果测量方法的可用性。

Martin Aman, Anna Pennekamp, Cosima Prahm, Piotr Czarnecki, Brigitte Van der Heijden, Leila Harhaus
{"title":"欧洲手外科通用的患者报告结果测量方法的可用性。","authors":"Martin Aman, Anna Pennekamp, Cosima Prahm, Piotr Czarnecki, Brigitte Van der Heijden, Leila Harhaus","doi":"10.1177/17531934241302227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many European healthcare systems emphasize value-based care to improve outcomes and control costs. Assessing function and satisfaction in hand surgery relies on patient reported outcome measures. This study evaluates the use of these outcome measures across Europe, focusing on diversity and language validation.A comprehensive database search for hand-specific patient reported outcome measures assessed availability for all official languages in Europe focusing on transculturally adapted and validated versions of available questionnaires. The study identified 47 European countries with 41 unique languages. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire is the most available outcome measure, translated into 41 languages. Availability of other outcome measures varied significantly by language. Gaps in the availability of hand specific patient reported outcome measures exist across Europe. To assist in translating and validating such questionnaires, an exemplary Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist is provided as supplementary material.<b>Level of evidence:</b> IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":94237,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","volume":" ","pages":"17531934241302227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The availability of common patient-reported outcome measures in hand surgery across Europe.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Aman, Anna Pennekamp, Cosima Prahm, Piotr Czarnecki, Brigitte Van der Heijden, Leila Harhaus\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17531934241302227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many European healthcare systems emphasize value-based care to improve outcomes and control costs. Assessing function and satisfaction in hand surgery relies on patient reported outcome measures. This study evaluates the use of these outcome measures across Europe, focusing on diversity and language validation.A comprehensive database search for hand-specific patient reported outcome measures assessed availability for all official languages in Europe focusing on transculturally adapted and validated versions of available questionnaires. The study identified 47 European countries with 41 unique languages. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire is the most available outcome measure, translated into 41 languages. Availability of other outcome measures varied significantly by language. Gaps in the availability of hand specific patient reported outcome measures exist across Europe. To assist in translating and validating such questionnaires, an exemplary Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist is provided as supplementary material.<b>Level of evidence:</b> IV.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17531934241302227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241302227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of hand surgery, European volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17531934241302227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多欧洲医疗系统强调以价值为基础的医疗服务,以提高疗效和控制成本。评估手部手术的功能和满意度有赖于患者报告的结果指标。这项研究评估了这些结果测量方法在欧洲的使用情况,重点关注多样性和语言验证。对手部特定患者报告结果测量方法进行了全面的数据库搜索,评估了欧洲所有官方语言的可用性,重点关注现有问卷的跨文化改编和验证版本。该研究确定了 47 个欧洲国家的 41 种独特语言。手臂、肩部和手部残疾问卷是可用性最高的结果测量方法,已被翻译成 41 种语言。其他结果测量方法的可用性因语言不同而存在显著差异。整个欧洲在手部特定患者报告结果测量的可用性方面存在差距。为帮助翻译和验证此类问卷,我们提供了一份示范性标准协议项目:作为补充材料,我们还提供了《标准方案项目:干预性试验建议》清单:证据等级:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The availability of common patient-reported outcome measures in hand surgery across Europe.

Many European healthcare systems emphasize value-based care to improve outcomes and control costs. Assessing function and satisfaction in hand surgery relies on patient reported outcome measures. This study evaluates the use of these outcome measures across Europe, focusing on diversity and language validation.A comprehensive database search for hand-specific patient reported outcome measures assessed availability for all official languages in Europe focusing on transculturally adapted and validated versions of available questionnaires. The study identified 47 European countries with 41 unique languages. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire is the most available outcome measure, translated into 41 languages. Availability of other outcome measures varied significantly by language. Gaps in the availability of hand specific patient reported outcome measures exist across Europe. To assist in translating and validating such questionnaires, an exemplary Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist is provided as supplementary material.Level of evidence: IV.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信