用于固定桡骨远端骨折背侧临界角的综合加压螺钉与单皮质锁定螺钉:生物力学研究。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Pedro Bronenberg Victorica, Lauren M Shapiro, Calvin Chan, Pablo De Carli, Luis Miguel Castro Appiani, Robin N Kamal
{"title":"用于固定桡骨远端骨折背侧临界角的综合加压螺钉与单皮质锁定螺钉:生物力学研究。","authors":"Pedro Bronenberg Victorica, Lauren M Shapiro, Calvin Chan, Pablo De Carli, Luis Miguel Castro Appiani, Robin N Kamal","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although studies have demonstrated that locked screws with a length of 75% of the radius width are sufficient for the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal radius, the application of this principle to intra-articular fractures is less well-understood. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different types of volar plate fixation constructs for the treatment of distal radius fractures in the presence of a dorsal critical corner fragment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dorsal critical corner fracture was created in 18 synthetic distal radius models. The fragment was stabilized with one of three constructs: a posteroanterior integrated compression screw (group 1) or volar locking screws with a length of 90% or 75% of the volar/dorsal width of the radius (groups 2 and 3, respectively). For the biomechanical evaluation, a load was applied to the lunate facet. Fixation stiffness and loads to produce clinical and catastrophic failures were compared among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stiffness (N/mm) was 67.8 (SD, 14.7), 64.9 (SD, 8.63), and 65.8 (SD, 36.02) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The load required to generate a catastrophic displacement was 532.9 (SD, 142.32), 307.4 (SD, 101.51), and 230.8 N (SD, 77.68) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The load required to produce a 2-mm translation of the fixed fragment was 127.9 N (SD, 28.8) for group 1, 119.7 (SD, 11.78) for group 2, and 127.6 N (SD, 46.2) for group 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significantly greater load is required for catastrophic failure after fixation of a dorsal critical corner fracture with an integrated compression screw; however, it provides similar stiffness and load to failure for 2 mm of translation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>For the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal critical corner fragments, an integrated compression screw may be considered for rigid fixation of the fragment to support early return to daily activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Compression Screw Versus Unicortical Locking Screw for Fixing the Dorsal Critical Corner in Distal Radius Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Bronenberg Victorica, Lauren M Shapiro, Calvin Chan, Pablo De Carli, Luis Miguel Castro Appiani, Robin N Kamal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although studies have demonstrated that locked screws with a length of 75% of the radius width are sufficient for the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal radius, the application of this principle to intra-articular fractures is less well-understood. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different types of volar plate fixation constructs for the treatment of distal radius fractures in the presence of a dorsal critical corner fragment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dorsal critical corner fracture was created in 18 synthetic distal radius models. The fragment was stabilized with one of three constructs: a posteroanterior integrated compression screw (group 1) or volar locking screws with a length of 90% or 75% of the volar/dorsal width of the radius (groups 2 and 3, respectively). For the biomechanical evaluation, a load was applied to the lunate facet. Fixation stiffness and loads to produce clinical and catastrophic failures were compared among the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stiffness (N/mm) was 67.8 (SD, 14.7), 64.9 (SD, 8.63), and 65.8 (SD, 36.02) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The load required to generate a catastrophic displacement was 532.9 (SD, 142.32), 307.4 (SD, 101.51), and 230.8 N (SD, 77.68) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The load required to produce a 2-mm translation of the fixed fragment was 127.9 N (SD, 28.8) for group 1, 119.7 (SD, 11.78) for group 2, and 127.6 N (SD, 46.2) for group 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significantly greater load is required for catastrophic failure after fixation of a dorsal critical corner fracture with an integrated compression screw; however, it provides similar stiffness and load to failure for 2 mm of translation.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>For the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal critical corner fragments, an integrated compression screw may be considered for rigid fixation of the fragment to support early return to daily activities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54815,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.10.014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管有研究表明,长度为桡骨宽度 75% 的锁定螺钉足以治疗桡骨远端关节外骨折,但对这一原则在关节内骨折中的应用却不甚了解。本研究旨在评估不同类型的桡骨外侧钢板固定结构在治疗存在背侧临界角碎片的桡骨远端骨折时的生物力学特性:方法:在 18 个合成桡骨远端模型中创建背侧临界角骨折。桡骨远端背侧临界角骨折,采用三种结构之一稳定骨折片:后前方综合加压螺钉(第 1 组)或长度为桡骨背侧宽度 90% 或 75% 的桡骨锁紧螺钉(第 2 组和第 3 组)。在进行生物力学评估时,对月骨面施加负荷。比较了各组的固定刚度以及产生临床和灾难性故障的载荷:结果:第1、2和3组的硬度(N/mm)分别为67.8(SD,14.7)、64.9(SD,8.63)和65.8(SD,36.02)。第一组、第二组和第三组产生灾难性位移所需的荷载分别为 532.9 牛顿(标凖,142.32)、307.4 牛顿(标凖,101.51)和 230.8 牛顿(标凖,77.68)。固定片平移 2 毫米所需的载荷分别为:第 1 组 127.9 牛顿(标度为 28.8),第 2 组 119.7 牛顿(标度为 11.78),第 3 组 127.6 牛顿(标度为 46.2):结论:使用集成加压螺钉固定背侧临界角骨折后,需要更大的载荷才能发生灾难性的破坏;然而,在平移 2 毫米的情况下,它能提供相似的刚度和载荷:临床意义:在治疗桡骨远端关节内骨折并伴有背侧临界角碎片时,可考虑使用集成加压螺钉对碎片进行刚性固定,以支持早日恢复日常活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated Compression Screw Versus Unicortical Locking Screw for Fixing the Dorsal Critical Corner in Distal Radius Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.

Purpose: Although studies have demonstrated that locked screws with a length of 75% of the radius width are sufficient for the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal radius, the application of this principle to intra-articular fractures is less well-understood. This study aimed to evaluate the biomechanical properties of different types of volar plate fixation constructs for the treatment of distal radius fractures in the presence of a dorsal critical corner fragment.

Methods: A dorsal critical corner fracture was created in 18 synthetic distal radius models. The fragment was stabilized with one of three constructs: a posteroanterior integrated compression screw (group 1) or volar locking screws with a length of 90% or 75% of the volar/dorsal width of the radius (groups 2 and 3, respectively). For the biomechanical evaluation, a load was applied to the lunate facet. Fixation stiffness and loads to produce clinical and catastrophic failures were compared among the groups.

Results: The stiffness (N/mm) was 67.8 (SD, 14.7), 64.9 (SD, 8.63), and 65.8 (SD, 36.02) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The load required to generate a catastrophic displacement was 532.9 (SD, 142.32), 307.4 (SD, 101.51), and 230.8 N (SD, 77.68) for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The load required to produce a 2-mm translation of the fixed fragment was 127.9 N (SD, 28.8) for group 1, 119.7 (SD, 11.78) for group 2, and 127.6 N (SD, 46.2) for group 3.

Conclusions: Significantly greater load is required for catastrophic failure after fixation of a dorsal critical corner fracture with an integrated compression screw; however, it provides similar stiffness and load to failure for 2 mm of translation.

Clinical relevance: For the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal critical corner fragments, an integrated compression screw may be considered for rigid fixation of the fragment to support early return to daily activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信