偏头痛女性患者的压力中心变量分析并不反映平衡方面的差异:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.2 Q3 REHABILITATION
Fernando Imaz, Mauro Barone, Ignacio Lassaga, Laura Davidow, Carolina Mainella, Leonardo Intelangelo
{"title":"偏头痛女性患者的压力中心变量分析并不反映平衡方面的差异:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Fernando Imaz, Mauro Barone, Ignacio Lassaga, Laura Davidow, Carolina Mainella, Leonardo Intelangelo","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Migraine is a neurological disease that affects proportionally more women. It has been documented that migraineurs often experience balance disturbances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the balance between migraineur patients (MG) and healthy volunteers classified as control group (CG).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study. Seventy-four women were evaluated: 37 MG and 37 CG. The evaluation of the center of pressure (COP) variables was carried out using a balance platform in three postures, bipodal eyes closed (BEC), right monopodal with eyes open (RMEO), and left monopodal with eyes open (LMEO). Self-report questionnaires (dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), fall risk efficacy scale (FES I), the functional impact scale (HIT 6) and the timed up and go test (TUG test) were used. The U-Mann Whitney test was used to verify differences in the COP between MG and CG. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between migraine groups (MGs) with postures, self-report questionnaires, and TUG test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant changes were found in the balance variables, except the medial-lateral excursion variable in the BEC (p < 0.02) and LMEO (p = 0.04) postures. No significant differences were found between the MGs with HIT 6 (p = 0.48) or FES I (p = 0.49). Significant differences were found between the MGs with DHI (p = 0.003). The TUG test showed statistically significant changes between groups (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The women with migraine in this sample did not show differences in postural balance, however, dizziness and functional differences are shown compared to healthy women.</p>","PeriodicalId":51431,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","volume":"40 ","pages":"1852-1858"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the center of pressure variables in women with migraine does not reflect differences in balance: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Imaz, Mauro Barone, Ignacio Lassaga, Laura Davidow, Carolina Mainella, Leonardo Intelangelo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Migraine is a neurological disease that affects proportionally more women. It has been documented that migraineurs often experience balance disturbances.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the balance between migraineur patients (MG) and healthy volunteers classified as control group (CG).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study. Seventy-four women were evaluated: 37 MG and 37 CG. The evaluation of the center of pressure (COP) variables was carried out using a balance platform in three postures, bipodal eyes closed (BEC), right monopodal with eyes open (RMEO), and left monopodal with eyes open (LMEO). Self-report questionnaires (dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), fall risk efficacy scale (FES I), the functional impact scale (HIT 6) and the timed up and go test (TUG test) were used. The U-Mann Whitney test was used to verify differences in the COP between MG and CG. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between migraine groups (MGs) with postures, self-report questionnaires, and TUG test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No statistically significant changes were found in the balance variables, except the medial-lateral excursion variable in the BEC (p < 0.02) and LMEO (p = 0.04) postures. No significant differences were found between the MGs with HIT 6 (p = 0.48) or FES I (p = 0.49). Significant differences were found between the MGs with DHI (p = 0.003). The TUG test showed statistically significant changes between groups (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The women with migraine in this sample did not show differences in postural balance, however, dizziness and functional differences are shown compared to healthy women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"1852-1858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.10.047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言偏头痛是一种神经系统疾病,女性患者比例较高。有资料显示,偏头痛患者经常会出现平衡障碍:评估偏头痛患者(MG)和被列为对照组(CG)的健康志愿者之间的平衡能力:方法:横断面研究。对 74 名女性进行了评估:方法:横断面研究。压力中心(COP)变量的评估是使用平衡平台在三种姿势下进行的,即闭眼双脚站立(BEC)、睁眼右脚单脚站立(RMEO)和睁眼左脚单脚站立(LMEO)。采用自我报告问卷(头晕障碍量表(DHI)、跌倒风险效能量表(FES I)、功能影响量表(HIT 6)和定时起立行走测试(TUG 测试))。采用 U-Mann Whitney 检验来验证 MG 和 CG 之间 COP 的差异。Kruskal-Wallis 单因素方差分析用于分析偏头痛组(MGs)在姿势、自我报告问卷和 TUG 测试方面的差异。A p 结果:除 BEC 中的内侧-外侧偏移变量外,其他平衡变量均未发现有统计学意义的变化(P 结论:偏头痛女性患者的平衡能力与偏头痛男性患者相比有明显差异:本样本中患有偏头痛的女性在姿势平衡方面没有表现出差异,但与健康女性相比,在头晕和功能方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the center of pressure variables in women with migraine does not reflect differences in balance: A cross-sectional study.

Introduction: Migraine is a neurological disease that affects proportionally more women. It has been documented that migraineurs often experience balance disturbances.

Objective: To evaluate the balance between migraineur patients (MG) and healthy volunteers classified as control group (CG).

Method: A cross-sectional study. Seventy-four women were evaluated: 37 MG and 37 CG. The evaluation of the center of pressure (COP) variables was carried out using a balance platform in three postures, bipodal eyes closed (BEC), right monopodal with eyes open (RMEO), and left monopodal with eyes open (LMEO). Self-report questionnaires (dizziness handicap inventory (DHI), fall risk efficacy scale (FES I), the functional impact scale (HIT 6) and the timed up and go test (TUG test) were used. The U-Mann Whitney test was used to verify differences in the COP between MG and CG. The Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA was used to analyze the differences between migraine groups (MGs) with postures, self-report questionnaires, and TUG test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: No statistically significant changes were found in the balance variables, except the medial-lateral excursion variable in the BEC (p < 0.02) and LMEO (p = 0.04) postures. No significant differences were found between the MGs with HIT 6 (p = 0.48) or FES I (p = 0.49). Significant differences were found between the MGs with DHI (p = 0.003). The TUG test showed statistically significant changes between groups (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The women with migraine in this sample did not show differences in postural balance, however, dizziness and functional differences are shown compared to healthy women.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
321 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies brings you the latest therapeutic techniques and current professional debate. Publishing highly illustrated articles on a wide range of subjects this journal is immediately relevant to everyday clinical practice in private, community and primary health care settings. Techiques featured include: • Physical Therapy • Osteopathy • Chiropractic • Massage Therapy • Structural Integration • Feldenkrais • Yoga Therapy • Dance • Physiotherapy • Pilates • Alexander Technique • Shiatsu and Tuina
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信