Tarek Abou Agwa, Salah Sakka, Azzam Al-Jundi, Giath Gazal
{"title":"在局部麻醉中加入 8.4% 碳酸氢钠对犬上部浸润时疼痛的影响。","authors":"Tarek Abou Agwa, Salah Sakka, Azzam Al-Jundi, Giath Gazal","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_235_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alkalization of local anesthetics may have an impact on alleviating the injection pain by buffering these solutions with sodium bicarbonate. The present study aimed to evaluate the pain during local anesthetic buccal infiltration for the maxillary canines after adding sodium bicarbonate 8.4% during local anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate 8.4% was used for one site, and an unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine was used for the other site at the same appointment. Two groups of volunteers (15 male and 15 female) participated. Each participant received 0.6 mL of the anesthetic solution. Injection discomfort was assessed using a visual analog scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73% and 93% of patients in group 1 experienced pain in sites A and B, respectively, during the injection, whereas 80% and 100% of patients in group 2 experienced pain in sites A and B, respectively, during the injection. Both groups showed a significant difference in pain scores between the two injected sites (<i>P</i> ˂ 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upper canine infiltration anesthesia with buffered lidocaine and epinephrine with sodium bicarbonate has less pain during injection than when unbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine is used.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"18 4","pages":"504-508"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of adding sodium bicarbonate 8.4% to local anesthesia on pain during upper canine infiltration.\",\"authors\":\"Tarek Abou Agwa, Salah Sakka, Azzam Al-Jundi, Giath Gazal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_235_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alkalization of local anesthetics may have an impact on alleviating the injection pain by buffering these solutions with sodium bicarbonate. The present study aimed to evaluate the pain during local anesthetic buccal infiltration for the maxillary canines after adding sodium bicarbonate 8.4% during local anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate 8.4% was used for one site, and an unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine was used for the other site at the same appointment. Two groups of volunteers (15 male and 15 female) participated. Each participant received 0.6 mL of the anesthetic solution. Injection discomfort was assessed using a visual analog scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>73% and 93% of patients in group 1 experienced pain in sites A and B, respectively, during the injection, whereas 80% and 100% of patients in group 2 experienced pain in sites A and B, respectively, during the injection. Both groups showed a significant difference in pain scores between the two injected sites (<i>P</i> ˂ 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Upper canine infiltration anesthesia with buffered lidocaine and epinephrine with sodium bicarbonate has less pain during injection than when unbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine is used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"504-508\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587985/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_235_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_235_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:通过用碳酸氢钠缓冲局麻药溶液,使其碱性化可能会对减轻注射疼痛产生影响。本研究旨在评估在局部麻醉过程中加入 8.4% 碳酸氢钠后,上颌犬齿局部麻醉剂颊面浸润时的疼痛情况:在同一预约时间,一个部位使用含 1:80000 肾上腺素和 8.4% 碳酸氢钠的缓冲 2% 利多卡因,另一个部位使用含 1:80000 肾上腺素的非缓冲 2% 利多卡因。两组志愿者(15 名男性和 15 名女性)参加了此次活动。每位志愿者注射 0.6 毫升麻醉溶液。用视觉模拟量表评估注射不适感:结果:第一组分别有 73% 和 93% 的患者在注射过程中 A 和 B 部位感到疼痛,而第二组分别有 80% 和 100% 的患者在注射过程中 A 和 B 部位感到疼痛。两组患者在两个注射部位的疼痛评分均有明显差异(P ˂ 0.01):结论:使用含碳酸氢钠的缓冲利多卡因和肾上腺素进行犬上部浸润麻醉比使用未缓冲利多卡因和肾上腺素进行注射时疼痛更轻。
Effect of adding sodium bicarbonate 8.4% to local anesthesia on pain during upper canine infiltration.
Background: Alkalization of local anesthetics may have an impact on alleviating the injection pain by buffering these solutions with sodium bicarbonate. The present study aimed to evaluate the pain during local anesthetic buccal infiltration for the maxillary canines after adding sodium bicarbonate 8.4% during local anesthesia.
Materials and methods: A buffered 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine and sodium bicarbonate 8.4% was used for one site, and an unbuffered 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine was used for the other site at the same appointment. Two groups of volunteers (15 male and 15 female) participated. Each participant received 0.6 mL of the anesthetic solution. Injection discomfort was assessed using a visual analog scale.
Results: 73% and 93% of patients in group 1 experienced pain in sites A and B, respectively, during the injection, whereas 80% and 100% of patients in group 2 experienced pain in sites A and B, respectively, during the injection. Both groups showed a significant difference in pain scores between the two injected sites (P ˂ 0.01).
Conclusion: Upper canine infiltration anesthesia with buffered lidocaine and epinephrine with sodium bicarbonate has less pain during injection than when unbuffered lidocaine with epinephrine is used.