右美托咪定作为腹横肌阻滞剂用于剖宫产镇痛的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.3 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-02 DOI:10.4103/sja.sja_306_24
Dalal Alsultan
{"title":"右美托咪定作为腹横肌阻滞剂用于剖宫产镇痛的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Dalal Alsultan","doi":"10.4103/sja.sja_306_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Postoperative pain management is a key component of care for women undergoing cesarean section. Although the use of dexmedetomidine (DMD) as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in transverse abdominal plane (TAP) blocks has been investigated, its conclusive evidence on its efficacy and safety remains unclear. A standardized data extraction form, under the guidance of the PRISMA protocol, was devised for selecting relevant studies across eight databases, without restrictions on the publication period. In most of the eight studies reviewed, the group receiving DMD demonstrated a significant extension of the duration of analgesia compared to the control group [mean difference (MD) = -3.37 hours, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -6.10 to -0.65 hours, Z = 2.43, <i>P</i> = 0.02]. The DMD group also showed a significant decrease in Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (MD = -1.38, 95% CI = -2.52 to -0.24, Z = 2.37, <i>P</i> = 0.02) in comparison to the control group. Nevertheless, significant heterogeneity was observed across the studies, potentially due to differences in study design, patient demographics, and dosing protocols, among other factors. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that DMD could be an effective adjuvant to local anesthetics in TAP blocks, potentially improving postoperative pain management and decreasing the need for additional analgesia. Nevertheless, the considerable heterogeneity among the studies warrants cautious interpretation of these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":21533,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"18 4","pages":"545-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in transverse abdominal plane blocks for cesarean section pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dalal Alsultan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/sja.sja_306_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Postoperative pain management is a key component of care for women undergoing cesarean section. Although the use of dexmedetomidine (DMD) as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in transverse abdominal plane (TAP) blocks has been investigated, its conclusive evidence on its efficacy and safety remains unclear. A standardized data extraction form, under the guidance of the PRISMA protocol, was devised for selecting relevant studies across eight databases, without restrictions on the publication period. In most of the eight studies reviewed, the group receiving DMD demonstrated a significant extension of the duration of analgesia compared to the control group [mean difference (MD) = -3.37 hours, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -6.10 to -0.65 hours, Z = 2.43, <i>P</i> = 0.02]. The DMD group also showed a significant decrease in Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (MD = -1.38, 95% CI = -2.52 to -0.24, Z = 2.37, <i>P</i> = 0.02) in comparison to the control group. Nevertheless, significant heterogeneity was observed across the studies, potentially due to differences in study design, patient demographics, and dosing protocols, among other factors. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that DMD could be an effective adjuvant to local anesthetics in TAP blocks, potentially improving postoperative pain management and decreasing the need for additional analgesia. Nevertheless, the considerable heterogeneity among the studies warrants cautious interpretation of these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"545-555\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587950/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_306_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/sja.sja_306_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

术后疼痛控制是剖腹产妇女护理的关键组成部分。尽管已对右美托咪定(DMD)作为局麻药的辅助药物用于腹横肌(TAP)阻滞进行了研究,但其有效性和安全性的确凿证据仍不明确。在 PRISMA 协议的指导下,我们设计了一份标准化的数据提取表,用于在八个数据库中选择相关研究,且不限制发表时间。在回顾的八项研究中,大多数研究显示,与对照组相比,接受 DMD 治疗组的镇痛持续时间显著延长[平均差异 (MD) = -3.37 小时,95% 置信区间 (CI) = -6.10 至 -0.65 小时,Z = 2.43,P = 0.02]。与对照组相比,DMD 组的视觉模拟量表疼痛评分也有显著下降(MD = -1.38, 95% CI = -2.52 to -0.24,Z = 2.37,P = 0.02)。然而,由于研究设计、患者人口统计学和给药方案等因素的不同,各研究之间存在明显的异质性。这项荟萃分析的结果表明,在 TAP 阻滞中,DMD 可以作为局麻药的有效辅助药物,从而改善术后疼痛管理,减少额外镇痛的需要。尽管如此,由于各研究之间存在相当大的异质性,因此需要谨慎解读这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant in transverse abdominal plane blocks for cesarean section pain management: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Postoperative pain management is a key component of care for women undergoing cesarean section. Although the use of dexmedetomidine (DMD) as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in transverse abdominal plane (TAP) blocks has been investigated, its conclusive evidence on its efficacy and safety remains unclear. A standardized data extraction form, under the guidance of the PRISMA protocol, was devised for selecting relevant studies across eight databases, without restrictions on the publication period. In most of the eight studies reviewed, the group receiving DMD demonstrated a significant extension of the duration of analgesia compared to the control group [mean difference (MD) = -3.37 hours, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -6.10 to -0.65 hours, Z = 2.43, P = 0.02]. The DMD group also showed a significant decrease in Visual Analogue Scale pain scores (MD = -1.38, 95% CI = -2.52 to -0.24, Z = 2.37, P = 0.02) in comparison to the control group. Nevertheless, significant heterogeneity was observed across the studies, potentially due to differences in study design, patient demographics, and dosing protocols, among other factors. The results of this meta-analysis indicate that DMD could be an effective adjuvant to local anesthetics in TAP blocks, potentially improving postoperative pain management and decreasing the need for additional analgesia. Nevertheless, the considerable heterogeneity among the studies warrants cautious interpretation of these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信