Marisa Gilstrop Thompson, Wenbo Xu, Bridget Moore, Tina Wang, Nicholas Sun, Hemant Pewar, Neil D Avent, Abelardo Vernaza, Felipe Acosta, Jessica L Saben, Vivienne Souter, Sheetal Parmar, Urmi Sengupta, Yucel Altug, Joshua EmBree, Carlos Cantos, Chitra Kotwaliwale, Joshua Babiarz, Bernhard Zimmermann, Ryan Swenerton, Jeffrey T Meltzer
{"title":"产前无细胞 DNA 筛查胎儿 RHD 测试在美国大型队列中的临床验证。","authors":"Marisa Gilstrop Thompson, Wenbo Xu, Bridget Moore, Tina Wang, Nicholas Sun, Hemant Pewar, Neil D Avent, Abelardo Vernaza, Felipe Acosta, Jessica L Saben, Vivienne Souter, Sheetal Parmar, Urmi Sengupta, Yucel Altug, Joshua EmBree, Carlos Cantos, Chitra Kotwaliwale, Joshua Babiarz, Bernhard Zimmermann, Ryan Swenerton, Jeffrey T Meltzer","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a large U.S. clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing-based, noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical validation study assessed the performance of a commercially available, next-generation sequencing-based cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD status. Samples that passed quality metrics were included if the patient had a previously reported cell-free DNA result for fetal aneuploidy, maternal RhD-negative serology, newborn RhD serology, and maternal RHD deletion or RHD-CE-D hybrid(r's) genotype. Dizygotic twin pregnancies were excluded. Maternal and fetal RHD genotypes were evaluated with prospective cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing analysis. At the time of analysis, investigators were blinded to fetal RhD status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 655 pregnant patients with serologic results for RhD antigen. Patient demographics included a representative distribution of race and ethnicities in the RhD-negative U.S. population (74.0% White, 13.7% Hispanic, 7.0% Black, and 2.1% Asian). Cell-free DNA fetal RHD was not reported in two cases. There were zero false-negative cases; 356 of 356 fetuses were correctly identified as fetal RhD positive (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI, 98.9-100%). Of the 297 RhD-negative fetuses, 295 were correctly identified as RhD negative (specificity 99.3%, 95% CI, 97.6-99.8%). Of the fetuses with a negative RhD phenotype, the cell-free DNA test accurately identified three with the fetal RHD pseudogene (RHDΨ) genotype.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Validation of this test in this large U.S. cohort of RhD-negative patients provides data on early and accurate noninvasive prenatal identification of fetal RHD genotype at 9 weeks of gestation or more. This test has the potential to assist patients and clinicians in the prevention and management of RhD alloimmunization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Validation of a Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Test for Fetal RHD in a Large U.S. Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Marisa Gilstrop Thompson, Wenbo Xu, Bridget Moore, Tina Wang, Nicholas Sun, Hemant Pewar, Neil D Avent, Abelardo Vernaza, Felipe Acosta, Jessica L Saben, Vivienne Souter, Sheetal Parmar, Urmi Sengupta, Yucel Altug, Joshua EmBree, Carlos Cantos, Chitra Kotwaliwale, Joshua Babiarz, Bernhard Zimmermann, Ryan Swenerton, Jeffrey T Meltzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To present a large U.S. clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing-based, noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical validation study assessed the performance of a commercially available, next-generation sequencing-based cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD status. Samples that passed quality metrics were included if the patient had a previously reported cell-free DNA result for fetal aneuploidy, maternal RhD-negative serology, newborn RhD serology, and maternal RHD deletion or RHD-CE-D hybrid(r's) genotype. Dizygotic twin pregnancies were excluded. Maternal and fetal RHD genotypes were evaluated with prospective cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing analysis. At the time of analysis, investigators were blinded to fetal RhD status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort consisted of 655 pregnant patients with serologic results for RhD antigen. Patient demographics included a representative distribution of race and ethnicities in the RhD-negative U.S. population (74.0% White, 13.7% Hispanic, 7.0% Black, and 2.1% Asian). Cell-free DNA fetal RHD was not reported in two cases. There were zero false-negative cases; 356 of 356 fetuses were correctly identified as fetal RhD positive (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI, 98.9-100%). Of the 297 RhD-negative fetuses, 295 were correctly identified as RhD negative (specificity 99.3%, 95% CI, 97.6-99.8%). Of the fetuses with a negative RhD phenotype, the cell-free DNA test accurately identified three with the fetal RHD pseudogene (RHDΨ) genotype.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Validation of this test in this large U.S. cohort of RhD-negative patients provides data on early and accurate noninvasive prenatal identification of fetal RHD genotype at 9 weeks of gestation or more. This test has the potential to assist patients and clinicians in the prevention and management of RhD alloimmunization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19483,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005794\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005794","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:介绍一种基于下一代测序的无创产前无细胞 DNA 检测胎儿 RHD 的大型美国临床验证:对基于下一代测序技术的无创产前无细胞 DNA 检测胎儿 RHD 进行大规模的美国临床验证:这项临床验证研究评估了基于新一代测序技术的商用无细胞 DNA 检测胎儿 RHD 状态的性能。如果患者之前曾报告过胎儿非整倍体、母体RhD阴性血清学结果、新生儿RhD血清学结果、母体RHD缺失或RHD-CE-D杂交(r's)基因型的无细胞DNA检测结果,那么通过质量指标检测的样本将被纳入其中。不包括异卵双胎妊娠。母体和胎儿的RHD基因型通过前瞻性无细胞DNA新一代测序分析进行评估。分析时,研究人员对胎儿的RhD状态保持盲法:队列由 655 名血清学结果为 RhD 抗原的孕妇组成。患者的人口统计学特征包括RhD阴性的美国人口中具有代表性的种族和民族分布(白人占74.0%,西班牙裔占13.7%,黑人占7.0%,亚裔占2.1%)。有两例未报告无细胞 DNA 胎儿 RHD。假阴性病例为零;356 个胎儿中有 356 个被正确鉴定为胎儿 RhD 阳性(灵敏度 100%,95% CI,98.9%-100%)。在 297 个 RhD 阴性胎儿中,295 个被正确鉴定为 RhD 阴性(特异性 99.3%,95% CI,97.6-99.8%)。在RhD表型阴性的胎儿中,无细胞DNA检测准确鉴定出3名胎儿的RHD假基因(RHDΨ)基因型:结论:该检测方法在美国大量RhD阴性患者中进行了验证,提供了在妊娠9周或更长时间内对胎儿RHD基因型进行早期、准确的无创产前鉴定的数据。这项检验有望帮助患者和临床医生预防和管理 RhD 同种免疫。
Clinical Validation of a Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Test for Fetal RHD in a Large U.S. Cohort.
Objective: To present a large U.S. clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing-based, noninvasive prenatal cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD.
Methods: This clinical validation study assessed the performance of a commercially available, next-generation sequencing-based cell-free DNA test for fetal RHD status. Samples that passed quality metrics were included if the patient had a previously reported cell-free DNA result for fetal aneuploidy, maternal RhD-negative serology, newborn RhD serology, and maternal RHD deletion or RHD-CE-D hybrid(r's) genotype. Dizygotic twin pregnancies were excluded. Maternal and fetal RHD genotypes were evaluated with prospective cell-free DNA next-generation sequencing analysis. At the time of analysis, investigators were blinded to fetal RhD status.
Results: The cohort consisted of 655 pregnant patients with serologic results for RhD antigen. Patient demographics included a representative distribution of race and ethnicities in the RhD-negative U.S. population (74.0% White, 13.7% Hispanic, 7.0% Black, and 2.1% Asian). Cell-free DNA fetal RHD was not reported in two cases. There were zero false-negative cases; 356 of 356 fetuses were correctly identified as fetal RhD positive (sensitivity 100%, 95% CI, 98.9-100%). Of the 297 RhD-negative fetuses, 295 were correctly identified as RhD negative (specificity 99.3%, 95% CI, 97.6-99.8%). Of the fetuses with a negative RhD phenotype, the cell-free DNA test accurately identified three with the fetal RHD pseudogene (RHDΨ) genotype.
Conclusion: Validation of this test in this large U.S. cohort of RhD-negative patients provides data on early and accurate noninvasive prenatal identification of fetal RHD genotype at 9 weeks of gestation or more. This test has the potential to assist patients and clinicians in the prevention and management of RhD alloimmunization.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.