颈静脉导管插入术与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者并发症的增加无关。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-26 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02173-1
Feras Akbik, Yuyang Shi, Steven Philips, Cederic Pimentel-Farias, Jonathan A Grossberg, Brian M Howard, Frank Tong, C Michael Cawley, Owen B Samuels, Yajun Mei, Ofer Sadan
{"title":"颈静脉导管插入术与动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者并发症的增加无关。","authors":"Feras Akbik, Yuyang Shi, Steven Philips, Cederic Pimentel-Farias, Jonathan A Grossberg, Brian M Howard, Frank Tong, C Michael Cawley, Owen B Samuels, Yajun Mei, Ofer Sadan","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02173-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Classic teaching in neurocritical care is to avoid jugular access for central venous catheterization (CVC) because of a presumed risk of increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). Limited data exist to test this hypothesis. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) leads to diffuse cerebral edema and often requires external ventricular drains (EVDs), which provide direct ICP measurements. Here, we test whether CVC access site correlates with ICP measurements and catheter-associated complications in patients with aSAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with aSAH admitted to Emory University Hospital between January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2020, were included. Patients were assigned by the access site of the first CVC placed. The subset of patients with an EVD were further studied. ICP measurements were analyzed using linear mixed effect models, with a binary comparison between internal-jugular (IJ) versus non-IJ access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1577 patients were admitted during the study period with CVC access: subclavian (SC) (887, 56.2%), IJ (365, 23.1%), femoral (72, 4.6%), and peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) (253, 16.0%). Traumatic pneumothorax was the most common with SC access (3.0%, p < 0.01). Catheter-associated infections did not differ between sites. Catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis was most common in femoral (8.3%) and PICC (3.6%) access (p < 0.05). A total of 1220 patients had an EVD, remained open by default, generating 351,462 ICP measurements. ICP measurements, as compared over the first 24-postinsertion hours and the next 10 days, were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analysis accounting for World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade on presentation yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to classic teaching, we find that IJ CVC placement was not associated with increased ICP in the clinical context of the largest, quantitative data set to date. Further, IJ access was the least likely to be associated with an access-site complication when compared with SC, femoral, and PICC. Together, these data support the safety, and perhaps preference, of ultrasound-guided IJ venous catheterization in neurocritically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"929-936"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jugular Venous Catheterization is Not Associated with Increased Complications in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.\",\"authors\":\"Feras Akbik, Yuyang Shi, Steven Philips, Cederic Pimentel-Farias, Jonathan A Grossberg, Brian M Howard, Frank Tong, C Michael Cawley, Owen B Samuels, Yajun Mei, Ofer Sadan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-024-02173-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Classic teaching in neurocritical care is to avoid jugular access for central venous catheterization (CVC) because of a presumed risk of increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). Limited data exist to test this hypothesis. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) leads to diffuse cerebral edema and often requires external ventricular drains (EVDs), which provide direct ICP measurements. Here, we test whether CVC access site correlates with ICP measurements and catheter-associated complications in patients with aSAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with aSAH admitted to Emory University Hospital between January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2020, were included. Patients were assigned by the access site of the first CVC placed. The subset of patients with an EVD were further studied. ICP measurements were analyzed using linear mixed effect models, with a binary comparison between internal-jugular (IJ) versus non-IJ access.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1577 patients were admitted during the study period with CVC access: subclavian (SC) (887, 56.2%), IJ (365, 23.1%), femoral (72, 4.6%), and peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) (253, 16.0%). Traumatic pneumothorax was the most common with SC access (3.0%, p < 0.01). Catheter-associated infections did not differ between sites. Catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis was most common in femoral (8.3%) and PICC (3.6%) access (p < 0.05). A total of 1220 patients had an EVD, remained open by default, generating 351,462 ICP measurements. ICP measurements, as compared over the first 24-postinsertion hours and the next 10 days, were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analysis accounting for World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade on presentation yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to classic teaching, we find that IJ CVC placement was not associated with increased ICP in the clinical context of the largest, quantitative data set to date. Further, IJ access was the least likely to be associated with an access-site complication when compared with SC, femoral, and PICC. Together, these data support the safety, and perhaps preference, of ultrasound-guided IJ venous catheterization in neurocritically ill patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"929-936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12137458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02173-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02173-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:神经重症监护领域的经典教导是避免颈静脉入路进行中心静脉导管插入术(CVC),因为假定颈静脉入路有增加颅内压(ICP)的风险。用于验证这一假设的数据十分有限。动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)会导致弥漫性脑水肿,通常需要脑室外引流管(EVD),这样就能直接测量ICP。在此,我们检验了 CVC 入路部位是否与 ICP 测量值和 aSAH 患者导管相关并发症有关:在一项单中心回顾性队列研究中,纳入了 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间入住埃默里大学医院的 aSAH 患者。患者按首次置入CVC的入路部位分配。对有 EVD 的患者子集进行了进一步研究。ICP测量值采用线性混合效应模型进行分析,并对颈内静脉(IJ)通路与非IJ通路进行二元比较:研究期间共有 1577 名患者使用 CVC 入路:锁骨下 (SC) (887 人,56.2%)、颈内静脉 (IJ) (365 人,23.1%)、股动脉 (72 人,4.6%) 和外周插入式中心导管 (PICC) (253 人,16.0%)。外伤性气胸最常见于 SC 入路(3.0%,P 结论:外伤性气胸在 SC 入路中最常见:与传统的教导相反,我们发现在迄今为止最大的定量数据集的临床背景下,IJ CVC 置入与 ICP 增高无关。此外,与 SC、股动脉和 PICC 相比,IJ 入路与入路部位并发症相关的可能性最小。总之,这些数据支持在超声引导下对神经重症患者进行 IJ 静脉导管插入术的安全性,甚至是偏好性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jugular Venous Catheterization is Not Associated with Increased Complications in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Background: Classic teaching in neurocritical care is to avoid jugular access for central venous catheterization (CVC) because of a presumed risk of increasing intracranial pressure (ICP). Limited data exist to test this hypothesis. Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) leads to diffuse cerebral edema and often requires external ventricular drains (EVDs), which provide direct ICP measurements. Here, we test whether CVC access site correlates with ICP measurements and catheter-associated complications in patients with aSAH.

Methods: In a single-center retrospective cohort study, patients with aSAH admitted to Emory University Hospital between January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2020, were included. Patients were assigned by the access site of the first CVC placed. The subset of patients with an EVD were further studied. ICP measurements were analyzed using linear mixed effect models, with a binary comparison between internal-jugular (IJ) versus non-IJ access.

Results: A total of 1577 patients were admitted during the study period with CVC access: subclavian (SC) (887, 56.2%), IJ (365, 23.1%), femoral (72, 4.6%), and peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) (253, 16.0%). Traumatic pneumothorax was the most common with SC access (3.0%, p < 0.01). Catheter-associated infections did not differ between sites. Catheter-associated deep venous thrombosis was most common in femoral (8.3%) and PICC (3.6%) access (p < 0.05). A total of 1220 patients had an EVD, remained open by default, generating 351,462 ICP measurements. ICP measurements, as compared over the first 24-postinsertion hours and the next 10 days, were similar between the two groups. Subgroup analysis accounting for World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade on presentation yielded similar results.

Conclusions: Contrary to classic teaching, we find that IJ CVC placement was not associated with increased ICP in the clinical context of the largest, quantitative data set to date. Further, IJ access was the least likely to be associated with an access-site complication when compared with SC, femoral, and PICC. Together, these data support the safety, and perhaps preference, of ultrasound-guided IJ venous catheterization in neurocritically ill patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信