肺韧带切除术对上叶切除术的影响:一项多中心匹配队列研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alessio Campisi, Andrea Dell'Amore, Wentao Fang, Gabriella Roca, Stefano Silvestrin, Samuele Nicotra, Yang Chen, Piotr Gabryel, Magdalena Sielewicz, Cezary Piwkowski, Eleonora La Rocca, Alexandro Patirelis, Vincenzo Ambrogi, Riccardo Giovannetti, Federico Rea, Maurizio Infante
{"title":"肺韧带切除术对上叶切除术的影响:一项多中心匹配队列研究","authors":"Alessio Campisi, Andrea Dell'Amore, Wentao Fang, Gabriella Roca, Stefano Silvestrin, Samuele Nicotra, Yang Chen, Piotr Gabryel, Magdalena Sielewicz, Cezary Piwkowski, Eleonora La Rocca, Alexandro Patirelis, Vincenzo Ambrogi, Riccardo Giovannetti, Federico Rea, Maurizio Infante","doi":"10.3390/jcm13226950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Division of the pulmonary ligament is standard in lower lobectomies, but its application in upper lobectomies remains controversial due to potential complications like atelectasis and bronchial kinking. This retrospective matched cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ligament resection in upper lobectomies for oncological purposes. <b>Methods</b>: From January 2015 to December 2020, 988 patients who underwent minimally invasive upper lobectomies across multiple centers were identified. They were categorized into ligament resection and no ligament resection groups, with propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize confounding factors. Endpoints included operative time, pleural effusion, complications (frequency and Clavien-Dindo scores), chest drainage removal, length of stay, pleural space, collapse rate, and bronchial kinking. <b>Results</b>: Following PSM, 276 patients were included in each group, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Ligament resection correlated with longer operative times, increased lymphadenectomy sampling at station #9 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and a bigger change in the bronchial angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed for the other endpoints. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ligament resection during upper lobectomy may impact the bronchial angle without immediate postoperative outcome changes. Further research is necessary to comprehensively assess the risks and benefits of ligament resection in upper lobectomies for neoplastic disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Pulmonary Ligament Resection in Upper Lobectomies: A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Campisi, Andrea Dell'Amore, Wentao Fang, Gabriella Roca, Stefano Silvestrin, Samuele Nicotra, Yang Chen, Piotr Gabryel, Magdalena Sielewicz, Cezary Piwkowski, Eleonora La Rocca, Alexandro Patirelis, Vincenzo Ambrogi, Riccardo Giovannetti, Federico Rea, Maurizio Infante\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcm13226950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Division of the pulmonary ligament is standard in lower lobectomies, but its application in upper lobectomies remains controversial due to potential complications like atelectasis and bronchial kinking. This retrospective matched cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ligament resection in upper lobectomies for oncological purposes. <b>Methods</b>: From January 2015 to December 2020, 988 patients who underwent minimally invasive upper lobectomies across multiple centers were identified. They were categorized into ligament resection and no ligament resection groups, with propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize confounding factors. Endpoints included operative time, pleural effusion, complications (frequency and Clavien-Dindo scores), chest drainage removal, length of stay, pleural space, collapse rate, and bronchial kinking. <b>Results</b>: Following PSM, 276 patients were included in each group, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Ligament resection correlated with longer operative times, increased lymphadenectomy sampling at station #9 (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and a bigger change in the bronchial angle (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed for the other endpoints. <b>Conclusions</b>: Ligament resection during upper lobectomy may impact the bronchial angle without immediate postoperative outcome changes. Further research is necessary to comprehensively assess the risks and benefits of ligament resection in upper lobectomies for neoplastic disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 22\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226950\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226950","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺韧带切除术是下肺叶切除术的标准术式,但由于其潜在的并发症(如肺不张和支气管扭转),在上肺叶切除术中的应用仍存在争议。这项回顾性匹配队列研究旨在评估上肺叶切除术中肺韧带切除的有效性和安全性。研究方法从 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月,在多个中心对 988 例接受微创上叶切除术的患者进行了鉴定。他们被分为韧带切除组和无韧带切除组,并进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以尽量减少混杂因素。研究终点包括手术时间、胸腔积液、并发症(频率和 Clavien-Dindo 评分)、胸腔引流清除、住院时间、胸膜腔、塌陷率和支气管扭结。结果:PSM术后,每组各有276名患者,基线特征无显著差异。韧带切除与手术时间延长、9号站淋巴腺切除取样增加(P < 0.001)和支气管角度变化较大(P < 0.001)相关。其他终点无明显统计学差异。结论上叶切除术中的韧带切除可能会影响支气管角度,但不会立即改变术后结果。有必要开展进一步研究,以全面评估上叶切除术中韧带切除对肿瘤性疾病的风险和益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Pulmonary Ligament Resection in Upper Lobectomies: A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study.

Background: Division of the pulmonary ligament is standard in lower lobectomies, but its application in upper lobectomies remains controversial due to potential complications like atelectasis and bronchial kinking. This retrospective matched cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ligament resection in upper lobectomies for oncological purposes. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2020, 988 patients who underwent minimally invasive upper lobectomies across multiple centers were identified. They were categorized into ligament resection and no ligament resection groups, with propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize confounding factors. Endpoints included operative time, pleural effusion, complications (frequency and Clavien-Dindo scores), chest drainage removal, length of stay, pleural space, collapse rate, and bronchial kinking. Results: Following PSM, 276 patients were included in each group, with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. Ligament resection correlated with longer operative times, increased lymphadenectomy sampling at station #9 (p < 0.001), and a bigger change in the bronchial angle (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed for the other endpoints. Conclusions: Ligament resection during upper lobectomy may impact the bronchial angle without immediate postoperative outcome changes. Further research is necessary to comprehensively assess the risks and benefits of ligament resection in upper lobectomies for neoplastic disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信