不适合接受三苯氧胺治疗的偏头痛患者的相对频率、特征和疾病负担:系统性文献综述。

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-27 DOI:10.1111/head.14854
Richard B Lipton, Astrid Gendolla, Lucy Abraham, Aaron Jenkins, Jersen Telfort, Karin Hygge Blakeman, Phillip A Saccone, Iwona Pustulka, Iain Fotheringham, Anita Engh
{"title":"不适合接受三苯氧胺治疗的偏头痛患者的相对频率、特征和疾病负担:系统性文献综述。","authors":"Richard B Lipton, Astrid Gendolla, Lucy Abraham, Aaron Jenkins, Jersen Telfort, Karin Hygge Blakeman, Phillip A Saccone, Iwona Pustulka, Iain Fotheringham, Anita Engh","doi":"10.1111/head.14854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review was conducted to systematically identify evidence characterizing patients with migraine who are unsuitable for triptans.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Triptans are not suitable as first-line treatment for all patients with migraine due to contraindications, lack of efficacy, and/or poor tolerability. However, there is debate about the frequency and characteristics of these patients and the burden they experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and conference abstracts (2011-2022) were reviewed for evidence on patients with migraine unsuitable for triptans for any reason. Data from publications describing the frequency and characteristics of this group, as well as the clinical, humanistic, or economic burden of disease in this population, were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1460 records screened, 29 publications met inclusion criteria. Persistence with triptans was low; 51%-66% of patients starting a new triptan did not refill it, and 43%-100% discontinued their initial triptan over 2 years. In one study, 14% of patients with migraine reported prior discontinuation/failure of ≥ 2 triptans due to inadequate efficacy or poor tolerability. Up to 15% of patients with migraine had triptan contraindications, and ≥ 20% of patients receiving triptans had contraindications. In four studies, 10%-44% of patients who tried triptans had insufficient response, although definitions varied. Patients who achieved a sufficient response typically did so with their first triptan; few became responders with additional triptans. Of patients who did not respond to one to two triptans and received another, 45% were dissatisfied with the final triptan. Approximately half of patients who tried two to three triptans had an insufficient response. Greater disability, impact of disease, and depression were reported in triptan discontinuers compared to those with sustained use. Worse quality of life scores and utility values were reported in triptan insufficient versus sufficient responders, as were greater migraine-related costs, work impairment, and health-care resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total population of patients unsuitable for triptans is uncertain, but the literature highlights a large group who cannot or do not persist with triptans, and current evidence suggests a high burden in this population and an unmet need for new therapeutic options. Further research is needed to determine the frequency of unsuitability for triptans more precisely and to assess the associated burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"164-179"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relative frequency, characteristics, and disease burden of patients with migraine unsuitable for triptan treatment: A systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Richard B Lipton, Astrid Gendolla, Lucy Abraham, Aaron Jenkins, Jersen Telfort, Karin Hygge Blakeman, Phillip A Saccone, Iwona Pustulka, Iain Fotheringham, Anita Engh\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.14854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This review was conducted to systematically identify evidence characterizing patients with migraine who are unsuitable for triptans.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Triptans are not suitable as first-line treatment for all patients with migraine due to contraindications, lack of efficacy, and/or poor tolerability. However, there is debate about the frequency and characteristics of these patients and the burden they experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, and conference abstracts (2011-2022) were reviewed for evidence on patients with migraine unsuitable for triptans for any reason. Data from publications describing the frequency and characteristics of this group, as well as the clinical, humanistic, or economic burden of disease in this population, were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1460 records screened, 29 publications met inclusion criteria. Persistence with triptans was low; 51%-66% of patients starting a new triptan did not refill it, and 43%-100% discontinued their initial triptan over 2 years. In one study, 14% of patients with migraine reported prior discontinuation/failure of ≥ 2 triptans due to inadequate efficacy or poor tolerability. Up to 15% of patients with migraine had triptan contraindications, and ≥ 20% of patients receiving triptans had contraindications. In four studies, 10%-44% of patients who tried triptans had insufficient response, although definitions varied. Patients who achieved a sufficient response typically did so with their first triptan; few became responders with additional triptans. Of patients who did not respond to one to two triptans and received another, 45% were dissatisfied with the final triptan. Approximately half of patients who tried two to three triptans had an insufficient response. Greater disability, impact of disease, and depression were reported in triptan discontinuers compared to those with sustained use. Worse quality of life scores and utility values were reported in triptan insufficient versus sufficient responders, as were greater migraine-related costs, work impairment, and health-care resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The total population of patients unsuitable for triptans is uncertain, but the literature highlights a large group who cannot or do not persist with triptans, and current evidence suggests a high burden in this population and an unmet need for new therapeutic options. Further research is needed to determine the frequency of unsuitability for triptans more precisely and to assess the associated burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"164-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11726002/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14854\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14854","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本综述系统地确定了不适合使用三苯氧胺的偏头痛患者的证据特征:本综述旨在系统地确定不适合使用曲普坦的偏头痛患者的特征证据:背景:由于禁忌症、缺乏疗效和/或耐受性差等原因,三苯氧胺并不适合作为所有偏头痛患者的一线治疗药物。然而,关于这些患者的发病频率、特征及其所承受的负担还存在争议:方法:研究人员查阅了MEDLINE、Embase和会议摘要(2011-2022年),以寻找因任何原因不适合使用三苯氧胺的偏头痛患者的相关证据。结果:在筛选出的 1460 条记录中,有 29 篇文章介绍了偏头痛患者的发病率和特征,以及该人群的临床、人文或经济负担:结果:在筛选出的 1460 条记录中,29 篇出版物符合纳入标准。三苯氧胺的持续用药率很低;51%-66%的患者在开始使用新的三苯氧胺后没有再继续用药,43%-100%的患者在两年内停用了最初的三苯氧胺。在一项研究中,14%的偏头痛患者报告称,由于疗效不佳或耐受性差,他们曾停用/失败使用过≥2种三苯氧胺。多达15%的偏头痛患者有三苯氧胺禁忌症,≥20%的接受三苯氧胺治疗的患者有禁忌症。在四项研究中,10%-44%试用过三苯氧胺的患者反应不足,但定义各不相同。获得充分应答的患者通常在服用第一种三苯氧胺后就有了应答;很少有患者在服用其他三苯氧胺后也有应答。在对一至两种三联类药物没有反应并接受了另一种三联类药物的患者中,45% 的人对最终的三联类药物不满意。在尝试了两到三种三普类药物的患者中,约有一半人的反应不充分。与持续使用三苯氧胺的患者相比,停用三苯氧胺的患者的残疾程度、疾病影响和抑郁程度更高。三普类药物疗效不佳者与疗效良好者相比,生活质量评分和效用值更低,偏头痛相关费用、工作损伤和医疗资源利用率也更高:结论:不适合使用三苯氧胺的患者总数尚不确定,但文献强调有很大一部分患者不能或不能坚持使用三苯氧胺,目前的证据表明这部分患者的负担很重,对新治疗方案的需求尚未得到满足。需要开展进一步研究,以更准确地确定不适合使用曲坦类药物的频率,并评估相关负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relative frequency, characteristics, and disease burden of patients with migraine unsuitable for triptan treatment: A systematic literature review.

Objective: This review was conducted to systematically identify evidence characterizing patients with migraine who are unsuitable for triptans.

Background: Triptans are not suitable as first-line treatment for all patients with migraine due to contraindications, lack of efficacy, and/or poor tolerability. However, there is debate about the frequency and characteristics of these patients and the burden they experience.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and conference abstracts (2011-2022) were reviewed for evidence on patients with migraine unsuitable for triptans for any reason. Data from publications describing the frequency and characteristics of this group, as well as the clinical, humanistic, or economic burden of disease in this population, were extracted.

Results: Of 1460 records screened, 29 publications met inclusion criteria. Persistence with triptans was low; 51%-66% of patients starting a new triptan did not refill it, and 43%-100% discontinued their initial triptan over 2 years. In one study, 14% of patients with migraine reported prior discontinuation/failure of ≥ 2 triptans due to inadequate efficacy or poor tolerability. Up to 15% of patients with migraine had triptan contraindications, and ≥ 20% of patients receiving triptans had contraindications. In four studies, 10%-44% of patients who tried triptans had insufficient response, although definitions varied. Patients who achieved a sufficient response typically did so with their first triptan; few became responders with additional triptans. Of patients who did not respond to one to two triptans and received another, 45% were dissatisfied with the final triptan. Approximately half of patients who tried two to three triptans had an insufficient response. Greater disability, impact of disease, and depression were reported in triptan discontinuers compared to those with sustained use. Worse quality of life scores and utility values were reported in triptan insufficient versus sufficient responders, as were greater migraine-related costs, work impairment, and health-care resource utilization.

Conclusion: The total population of patients unsuitable for triptans is uncertain, but the literature highlights a large group who cannot or do not persist with triptans, and current evidence suggests a high burden in this population and an unmet need for new therapeutic options. Further research is needed to determine the frequency of unsuitability for triptans more precisely and to assess the associated burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信