Sue A Brown, Lori M Laffel, Halis K Akturk, Gregory P Forlenza, Viral N Shah, R Paul Wadwa, Erin C Cobry, Elvira Isganaitis, Melissa Schoelwer, Virginia S Lu, Ricardo Rueda, Nicholas Sherer, John P Corbett, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Jordan E Pinsker
{"title":"在基线血糖控制水平不一的成人、青少年、儿童和学龄前儿童中,采用较低治疗范围和修改的餐前注射模块的 Control-IQ 技术随机交叉试验。","authors":"Sue A Brown, Lori M Laffel, Halis K Akturk, Gregory P Forlenza, Viral N Shah, R Paul Wadwa, Erin C Cobry, Elvira Isganaitis, Melissa Schoelwer, Virginia S Lu, Ricardo Rueda, Nicholas Sherer, John P Corbett, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Jordan E Pinsker","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> We evaluated a modified version of Control-IQ technology with a lower treatment range and a modified meal bolus module in adults, adolescents, children, and preschoolers with type 1 diabetes in a multicenter, randomized, and crossover trial. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> After a 2-week run-in with Control-IQ technology v1.5, the modified system was evaluated for 2 weeks using treatment range of 112.5-160 mg/dL (standard range [SR]), and for 2 weeks using lower treatment range of 90-130 mg/dL (lower range, LR), at home in random order. Two late bolus meal challenges were performed in each 2-week period, bolusing 45 min after meals with and without a new late bolus feature. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 72 participants aged 3-57 years completed the study. There were no diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia events. All meal challenges were completed safely. Time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL improved the most with LR to 68.0% (+3.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +2.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR). Similar improvements were observed for time in tight range (TITR) 70-140 mg/dL (+3.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +4.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR), time >180 mg/dL, and mean glucose. Participants with lower baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) achieved the highest TIR and TITR with LR use, while the greatest improvements in TIR and TITR were evident in those with higher baseline HbA1c. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The lower treatment range and late bolus feature of the modified Control-IQ system were safe for use in all age-groups. TIR and TITR improved with LR regardless of baseline HbA1c.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, Crossover Trial of Control-IQ Technology with a Lower Treatment Range and a Modified Meal Bolus Module in Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Preschoolers with Varying Levels of Baseline Glycemic Control.\",\"authors\":\"Sue A Brown, Lori M Laffel, Halis K Akturk, Gregory P Forlenza, Viral N Shah, R Paul Wadwa, Erin C Cobry, Elvira Isganaitis, Melissa Schoelwer, Virginia S Lu, Ricardo Rueda, Nicholas Sherer, John P Corbett, Ravid Sasson-Katchalski, Jordan E Pinsker\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/dia.2024.0501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> We evaluated a modified version of Control-IQ technology with a lower treatment range and a modified meal bolus module in adults, adolescents, children, and preschoolers with type 1 diabetes in a multicenter, randomized, and crossover trial. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> After a 2-week run-in with Control-IQ technology v1.5, the modified system was evaluated for 2 weeks using treatment range of 112.5-160 mg/dL (standard range [SR]), and for 2 weeks using lower treatment range of 90-130 mg/dL (lower range, LR), at home in random order. Two late bolus meal challenges were performed in each 2-week period, bolusing 45 min after meals with and without a new late bolus feature. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Overall, 72 participants aged 3-57 years completed the study. There were no diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia events. All meal challenges were completed safely. Time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL improved the most with LR to 68.0% (+3.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +2.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR). Similar improvements were observed for time in tight range (TITR) 70-140 mg/dL (+3.3%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +4.0%, <i>P</i> < 0.001, for LR vs. SR), time >180 mg/dL, and mean glucose. Participants with lower baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) achieved the highest TIR and TITR with LR use, while the greatest improvements in TIR and TITR were evident in those with higher baseline HbA1c. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The lower treatment range and late bolus feature of the modified Control-IQ system were safe for use in all age-groups. TIR and TITR improved with LR regardless of baseline HbA1c.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes technology & therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0501\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0501","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们在一项多中心、随机和交叉试验中评估了改进版的 Control-IQ 技术,该技术具有较低的治疗范围和改进的餐栓模块,适用于成人、青少年、儿童和学龄前 1 型糖尿病患者。研究设计与方法:在使用 Control-IQ 技术 v1.5 进行为期 2 周的试运行后,对改进后的系统进行了为期 2 周的评估,治疗范围为 112.5-160 mg/dL(标准范围 [SR]),以及为期 2 周的评估,治疗范围较低,为 90-130 mg/dL(较低范围,LR)。在每两周内进行两次晚期栓剂进餐挑战,分别在有和没有新的晚期栓剂特征的餐后 45 分钟进行栓剂进餐。结果:共有 72 名 3-57 岁的参与者完成了研究。没有发生糖尿病酮症酸中毒或严重低血糖事件。所有进餐挑战均安全完成。70-180 毫克/分升范围内的时间(TIR)在 LR 的改善幅度最大,达到 68.0%(LR vs. run-in 为 +3.1%,P < 0.001;LR vs. SR 为 +2.1%,P < 0.001)。在 70-140 mg/dL 紧缩范围(TITR)内的时间(LR vs. run-in:+3.3%,P < 0.001;LR vs. SR:+4.0%,P < 0.001)、>180 mg/dL 的时间和平均血糖方面也观察到类似的改善。使用 LR 后,基线血红蛋白 A1c (HbA1c) 较低的参与者的 TIR 和 TITR 最高,而基线 HbA1c 较高的参与者的 TIR 和 TITR 改善最大。结论改良版 Control-IQ 系统的治疗范围较低,且具有晚用栓剂的特点,在所有年龄组中使用都很安全。无论基线 HbA1c 如何,TIR 和 TITR 都随着 LR 的增加而改善。
Randomized, Crossover Trial of Control-IQ Technology with a Lower Treatment Range and a Modified Meal Bolus Module in Adults, Adolescents, Children, and Preschoolers with Varying Levels of Baseline Glycemic Control.
Objective: We evaluated a modified version of Control-IQ technology with a lower treatment range and a modified meal bolus module in adults, adolescents, children, and preschoolers with type 1 diabetes in a multicenter, randomized, and crossover trial. Research Design and Methods: After a 2-week run-in with Control-IQ technology v1.5, the modified system was evaluated for 2 weeks using treatment range of 112.5-160 mg/dL (standard range [SR]), and for 2 weeks using lower treatment range of 90-130 mg/dL (lower range, LR), at home in random order. Two late bolus meal challenges were performed in each 2-week period, bolusing 45 min after meals with and without a new late bolus feature. Results: Overall, 72 participants aged 3-57 years completed the study. There were no diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia events. All meal challenges were completed safely. Time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL improved the most with LR to 68.0% (+3.1%, P < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +2.1%, P < 0.001, for LR vs. SR). Similar improvements were observed for time in tight range (TITR) 70-140 mg/dL (+3.3%, P < 0.001, for LR vs. run-in and +4.0%, P < 0.001, for LR vs. SR), time >180 mg/dL, and mean glucose. Participants with lower baseline hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) achieved the highest TIR and TITR with LR use, while the greatest improvements in TIR and TITR were evident in those with higher baseline HbA1c. Conclusions: The lower treatment range and late bolus feature of the modified Control-IQ system were safe for use in all age-groups. TIR and TITR improved with LR regardless of baseline HbA1c.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.