利用理论领域框架确定非瓣膜性心房颤动循证建议的障碍。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Evan White, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Sandeep Jain, Charles Medico, Nicole Ansani, James C Coons
{"title":"利用理论领域框架确定非瓣膜性心房颤动循证建议的障碍。","authors":"Evan White, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Sandeep Jain, Charles Medico, Nicole Ansani, James C Coons","doi":"10.1177/10600280241298947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of evidence-based guidelines in patient care is inefficient. Only 14% of new research are routinely adopted into clinical practice. The atrial fibrillation (AF) practice guidelines recommend anticoagulation in men with a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score greater than or equal to 2 and in women with a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score greater than or equal to 3. Despite these recommendations, oral anticoagulation prescribing rates were found to be as low as 51%. Existing frameworks, such as the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF), are used in implementation science to identify behavior changes to overcome barriers to guideline adoption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this project, we explored behavioral themes and barriers that prevented clinician adherence to evidence-based recommendations for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and developed interventions to overcome those barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine focused interviews were conducted with stakeholders across multiple disciplines involved with NVAF care. Interview questions were based on the TDF and designed to determine behavior changes necessary to increase appropriate anticoagulation prescribing and decrease unnecessary NVAF hospital admissions. The interviews were transcribed and coded using NVivo 12 qualitative data analysis software (released 2018). Themes were documented, and interventions were then developed to address the barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TDF interviews yielded 4 main barrier themes regarding appropriate NVAF management in 2 theoretical domains. These themes were lack of knowledge, cost of anticoagulation, patient refusal to take anticoagulation, and social determinants of health. The theoretical domains were knowledge and environmental context and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Based on our limited interviews, the TDF framework informed potential barriers contributing to the underutilization of appropriate anticoagulation in patients with NVAF. Techniques for behavior change interventions may be applied to overcome the identified barriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280241298947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilizing Theoretical Domains Framework to Determine Barriers to Evidence-Based Recommendations in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Evan White, Sandra L Kane-Gill, Sandeep Jain, Charles Medico, Nicole Ansani, James C Coons\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280241298947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implementation of evidence-based guidelines in patient care is inefficient. Only 14% of new research are routinely adopted into clinical practice. The atrial fibrillation (AF) practice guidelines recommend anticoagulation in men with a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score greater than or equal to 2 and in women with a CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc score greater than or equal to 3. Despite these recommendations, oral anticoagulation prescribing rates were found to be as low as 51%. Existing frameworks, such as the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF), are used in implementation science to identify behavior changes to overcome barriers to guideline adoption.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this project, we explored behavioral themes and barriers that prevented clinician adherence to evidence-based recommendations for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and developed interventions to overcome those barriers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine focused interviews were conducted with stakeholders across multiple disciplines involved with NVAF care. Interview questions were based on the TDF and designed to determine behavior changes necessary to increase appropriate anticoagulation prescribing and decrease unnecessary NVAF hospital admissions. The interviews were transcribed and coded using NVivo 12 qualitative data analysis software (released 2018). Themes were documented, and interventions were then developed to address the barriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TDF interviews yielded 4 main barrier themes regarding appropriate NVAF management in 2 theoretical domains. These themes were lack of knowledge, cost of anticoagulation, patient refusal to take anticoagulation, and social determinants of health. The theoretical domains were knowledge and environmental context and resources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Based on our limited interviews, the TDF framework informed potential barriers contributing to the underutilization of appropriate anticoagulation in patients with NVAF. Techniques for behavior change interventions may be applied to overcome the identified barriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280241298947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241298947\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280241298947","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在患者护理中实施循证指南的效率很低。仅有 14% 的新研究成果被常规采用到临床实践中。心房颤动(AF)实践指南建议 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分大于或等于 2 分的男性和 CHA2DS2-VASc 评分大于或等于 3 分的女性进行抗凝治疗。现有的框架,如理论领域框架(TDF),被用于实施科学,以确定行为改变,克服指南采用的障碍:在本项目中,我们探讨了阻碍临床医生遵守针对非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的循证建议的行为主题和障碍,并制定了克服这些障碍的干预措施:方法: 对参与 NVAF 治疗的多个学科的利益相关者进行了九次重点访谈。访谈问题以 TDF 为基础,旨在确定增加适当的抗凝处方和减少不必要的 NVAF 住院所需的行为改变。访谈内容使用 NVivo 12 定性数据分析软件(2018 年发布)进行转录和编码。记录主题,然后制定干预措施以解决障碍:TDF访谈在2个理论领域产生了4个主要障碍主题,涉及适当的NVAF管理。这些主题分别是缺乏知识、抗凝成本、患者拒绝接受抗凝治疗以及健康的社会决定因素。这些理论领域分别是知识、环境背景和资源:基于我们有限的访谈,TDF 框架揭示了导致 NVAF 患者未充分利用适当抗凝治疗的潜在障碍。行为改变干预技术可用于克服已识别的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilizing Theoretical Domains Framework to Determine Barriers to Evidence-Based Recommendations in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Background: Implementation of evidence-based guidelines in patient care is inefficient. Only 14% of new research are routinely adopted into clinical practice. The atrial fibrillation (AF) practice guidelines recommend anticoagulation in men with a CHA2DS2-VASc score greater than or equal to 2 and in women with a CHA2DS2-VASc score greater than or equal to 3. Despite these recommendations, oral anticoagulation prescribing rates were found to be as low as 51%. Existing frameworks, such as the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF), are used in implementation science to identify behavior changes to overcome barriers to guideline adoption.

Objective: In this project, we explored behavioral themes and barriers that prevented clinician adherence to evidence-based recommendations for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and developed interventions to overcome those barriers.

Methods: Nine focused interviews were conducted with stakeholders across multiple disciplines involved with NVAF care. Interview questions were based on the TDF and designed to determine behavior changes necessary to increase appropriate anticoagulation prescribing and decrease unnecessary NVAF hospital admissions. The interviews were transcribed and coded using NVivo 12 qualitative data analysis software (released 2018). Themes were documented, and interventions were then developed to address the barriers.

Results: TDF interviews yielded 4 main barrier themes regarding appropriate NVAF management in 2 theoretical domains. These themes were lack of knowledge, cost of anticoagulation, patient refusal to take anticoagulation, and social determinants of health. The theoretical domains were knowledge and environmental context and resources.

Conclusion and relevance: Based on our limited interviews, the TDF framework informed potential barriers contributing to the underutilization of appropriate anticoagulation in patients with NVAF. Techniques for behavior change interventions may be applied to overcome the identified barriers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
166
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信