Minhazur R Sarker, Dana Canfield, Lauren Ferrara, Gladys A Ramos, Chelsea A DeBolt
{"title":"与妊娠进展性肝内胆汁淤积症相关的不良后果。","authors":"Minhazur R Sarker, Dana Canfield, Lauren Ferrara, Gladys A Ramos, Chelsea A DeBolt","doi":"10.1055/a-2483-5910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to assess the association between increasing bile acid levels in pregnancies with cholestasis and adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous gestations complicated by cholestasis delivered at a single academic medical center from 2005 to 2019. We compared rates of adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by mild cholestasis (initial total bile acid [TBA] <40 μmol/L and peak TBA <40 μmol/L), progressive cholestasis (initial TBA <40 μmol/L and peak TBA ≥40 μmol/L), and severe cholestasis (initial TBA ≥40 μmol/L). Our primary outcome was a composite adverse outcome including spontaneous preterm labor and delivery, umbilical artery pH <7.20, 5-minute Apgar <7, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Analyses were performed using mild cholestasis as the base comparator and a second analysis using severe cholestasis as the base comparator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 1,182 pregnancies complicated by cholestasis, 732 (61.9%) had mild cholestasis, 78 (6.6%) had progressive cholestasis, and 372 (31.5%) had severe cholestasis. After adjusting for confounders including gestational age at diagnosis and using mild cholestasis as the base comparator, both progressive and severe cholestasis were associated with the composite adverse outcome (progressive intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [ICP] OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.04-2.78 and severe ICP OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.24-2.06). When using progressive cholestasis as the base comparator, there were no statistically significant differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between progressive cholestasis and severe cholestasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study highlights the significance of monitoring peak bile acid levels and that some cases of cholestasis may progress in pregnancy and the adverse associations are better reflected by the peak TBA level and not the cholestasis severity at initial diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Outcomes with worsening cholestasis severity (progressive) are unknown.. · Retrospective study comparing mild to progressive to severe cholestasis.. · Progressive cholestasis outcomes are more similar to severe cholestasis.. · Clinical utility of trending bile acids warrants further study..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adverse Outcomes Associated with Progressive Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Minhazur R Sarker, Dana Canfield, Lauren Ferrara, Gladys A Ramos, Chelsea A DeBolt\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2483-5910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> This study aimed to assess the association between increasing bile acid levels in pregnancies with cholestasis and adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous gestations complicated by cholestasis delivered at a single academic medical center from 2005 to 2019. We compared rates of adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by mild cholestasis (initial total bile acid [TBA] <40 μmol/L and peak TBA <40 μmol/L), progressive cholestasis (initial TBA <40 μmol/L and peak TBA ≥40 μmol/L), and severe cholestasis (initial TBA ≥40 μmol/L). Our primary outcome was a composite adverse outcome including spontaneous preterm labor and delivery, umbilical artery pH <7.20, 5-minute Apgar <7, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Analyses were performed using mild cholestasis as the base comparator and a second analysis using severe cholestasis as the base comparator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Of the 1,182 pregnancies complicated by cholestasis, 732 (61.9%) had mild cholestasis, 78 (6.6%) had progressive cholestasis, and 372 (31.5%) had severe cholestasis. After adjusting for confounders including gestational age at diagnosis and using mild cholestasis as the base comparator, both progressive and severe cholestasis were associated with the composite adverse outcome (progressive intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [ICP] OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.04-2.78 and severe ICP OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.24-2.06). When using progressive cholestasis as the base comparator, there were no statistically significant differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between progressive cholestasis and severe cholestasis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study highlights the significance of monitoring peak bile acid levels and that some cases of cholestasis may progress in pregnancy and the adverse associations are better reflected by the peak TBA level and not the cholestasis severity at initial diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Outcomes with worsening cholestasis severity (progressive) are unknown.. · Retrospective study comparing mild to progressive to severe cholestasis.. · Progressive cholestasis outcomes are more similar to severe cholestasis.. · Clinical utility of trending bile acids warrants further study..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2483-5910\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2483-5910","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的评估胆汁淤积症孕妇胆汁酸水平升高与不良结局之间的关联:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2005-2019 年间在一家学术医疗中心分娩的胆汁淤积症并发单胎非畸形妊娠。我们比较了轻度胆汁淤积症(初始总胆汁酸 (TBA) < 40 μmol/L,峰值 TBA < 40 μmol/L)、进展性胆汁淤积症(初始 TBA < 40 μmol/L,峰值 TBA ≥ 40 μmol/L)和重度胆汁淤积症(初始 TBA ≥ 40 μmol/L)并发妊娠的不良后果发生率。我们的主要结果是综合不良结局,包括自发性早产和分娩、脐动脉pH值<7.20、5分钟Apgar<7、因胎心率描记不能保证而剖宫产、羊水带胎粪和新生儿入住ICU。以轻度胆汁淤积症为基础参照物进行了分析,以重度胆汁淤积症为基础参照物进行了第二次分析:在1182例胆汁淤积症并发妊娠中,732例(61.9%)为轻度胆汁淤积症,78例(6.6%)为进行性胆汁淤积症,372例(31.5%)为重度胆汁淤积症。在调整了包括诊断时胎龄在内的混杂因素并将轻度胆汁淤积作为基础参照物后,进展性胆汁淤积和重度胆汁淤积均与综合不良结局相关(进展性ICP OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.04-2.78,重度ICP OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.24-2.06)。如果将进行性胆汁淤积症作为基础比较指标,进行性胆汁淤积症和重度胆汁淤积症的主要或次要结果在统计学上没有显著差异:本研究强调了监测胆汁酸峰值水平的重要性,一些胆汁淤积症病例可能会在妊娠期进展,总胆汁酸峰值水平而非最初诊断时的胆汁淤积症严重程度更能反映其不良关联。
Adverse Outcomes Associated with Progressive Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the association between increasing bile acid levels in pregnancies with cholestasis and adverse outcomes.
Study design: This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton, non-anomalous gestations complicated by cholestasis delivered at a single academic medical center from 2005 to 2019. We compared rates of adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by mild cholestasis (initial total bile acid [TBA] <40 μmol/L and peak TBA <40 μmol/L), progressive cholestasis (initial TBA <40 μmol/L and peak TBA ≥40 μmol/L), and severe cholestasis (initial TBA ≥40 μmol/L). Our primary outcome was a composite adverse outcome including spontaneous preterm labor and delivery, umbilical artery pH <7.20, 5-minute Apgar <7, cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Analyses were performed using mild cholestasis as the base comparator and a second analysis using severe cholestasis as the base comparator.
Results: Of the 1,182 pregnancies complicated by cholestasis, 732 (61.9%) had mild cholestasis, 78 (6.6%) had progressive cholestasis, and 372 (31.5%) had severe cholestasis. After adjusting for confounders including gestational age at diagnosis and using mild cholestasis as the base comparator, both progressive and severe cholestasis were associated with the composite adverse outcome (progressive intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy [ICP] OR 1.70; 95% CI 1.04-2.78 and severe ICP OR 1.60; 95% CI 1.24-2.06). When using progressive cholestasis as the base comparator, there were no statistically significant differences in the primary or secondary outcomes between progressive cholestasis and severe cholestasis.
Conclusion: This study highlights the significance of monitoring peak bile acid levels and that some cases of cholestasis may progress in pregnancy and the adverse associations are better reflected by the peak TBA level and not the cholestasis severity at initial diagnosis.
Key points: · Outcomes with worsening cholestasis severity (progressive) are unknown.. · Retrospective study comparing mild to progressive to severe cholestasis.. · Progressive cholestasis outcomes are more similar to severe cholestasis.. · Clinical utility of trending bile acids warrants further study..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.