局部晚期直肠癌新辅助化疗前后的肿瘤测序:肿瘤基因特征和临床结果

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Kerstin Clasen , Nadja Ballin , Leon Schütz , Irina Bonzheim , Olga Kelemen , Michael Orth , Cihan Gani , Olaf Rieß , Stephan Ossowski , Maximilian Niyazi , Christopher Schroeder
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌新辅助化疗前后的肿瘤测序:肿瘤基因特征和临床结果","authors":"Kerstin Clasen ,&nbsp;Nadja Ballin ,&nbsp;Leon Schütz ,&nbsp;Irina Bonzheim ,&nbsp;Olga Kelemen ,&nbsp;Michael Orth ,&nbsp;Cihan Gani ,&nbsp;Olaf Rieß ,&nbsp;Stephan Ossowski ,&nbsp;Maximilian Niyazi ,&nbsp;Christopher Schroeder","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is a standard treatment option for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, there is still conflicting data about the genetic landscape and potential dynamics during and after NCRT. This study evaluated oncogenic driver mutations before NCRT and investigated corresponding resection samples after treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In 17 patients the pre-therapeutic biopsy and in ten cases the related resection specimen were investigated by next-generation sequencing using a dedicated cancer panel (708 genes). Oncogenic driver mutations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were compared pre- and post NCRT to evaluate stability of the genomic landscape. TMB and frequently detected driver mutations were correlated with outcome parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our corresponding tumor samples before and after NCRT 95.2 % of the oncogenic driver mutations could be found in both specimens whereas one <em>ATM</em> and one <em>RYR1</em> mutation were not detectable after NCRT. TMB decreased in all patients after neoadjuvant treatment. <em>KRAS</em> ± <em>TP53</em> mutations and TMB ≥ 5 were associated with impaired outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most oncogenic driver mutations investigated persisted after neoadjuvant treatment. At the same time, we did not observe ascending TMB after treatment but decline. Thus, NCRT does not seem to induce a relevant number of new driver mutations or mutational burden. Genetic profiling implies the potential to support tumor-informed approaches and outcome estimation in future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100894"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome\",\"authors\":\"Kerstin Clasen ,&nbsp;Nadja Ballin ,&nbsp;Leon Schütz ,&nbsp;Irina Bonzheim ,&nbsp;Olga Kelemen ,&nbsp;Michael Orth ,&nbsp;Cihan Gani ,&nbsp;Olaf Rieß ,&nbsp;Stephan Ossowski ,&nbsp;Maximilian Niyazi ,&nbsp;Christopher Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is a standard treatment option for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, there is still conflicting data about the genetic landscape and potential dynamics during and after NCRT. This study evaluated oncogenic driver mutations before NCRT and investigated corresponding resection samples after treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>In 17 patients the pre-therapeutic biopsy and in ten cases the related resection specimen were investigated by next-generation sequencing using a dedicated cancer panel (708 genes). Oncogenic driver mutations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were compared pre- and post NCRT to evaluate stability of the genomic landscape. TMB and frequently detected driver mutations were correlated with outcome parameters.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In our corresponding tumor samples before and after NCRT 95.2 % of the oncogenic driver mutations could be found in both specimens whereas one <em>ATM</em> and one <em>RYR1</em> mutation were not detectable after NCRT. TMB decreased in all patients after neoadjuvant treatment. <em>KRAS</em> ± <em>TP53</em> mutations and TMB ≥ 5 were associated with impaired outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Most oncogenic driver mutations investigated persisted after neoadjuvant treatment. At the same time, we did not observe ascending TMB after treatment but decline. Thus, NCRT does not seem to induce a relevant number of new driver mutations or mutational burden. Genetic profiling implies the potential to support tumor-informed approaches and outcome estimation in future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400171X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563082400171X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的新辅助化放疗(NCRT)是局部晚期直肠癌的标准治疗方案。然而,关于 NCRT 期间和之后的基因状况和潜在动态的数据仍然相互矛盾。本研究评估了 NCRT 治疗前的致癌驱动基因突变,并对治疗后的相应切除样本进行了调查。材料和方法使用专用癌症面板(708 个基因)对 17 例患者的治疗前活检和 10 例患者的相关切除标本进行了新一代测序。对NCRT前后的致癌驱动基因突变和肿瘤突变负荷(TMB)进行了比较,以评估基因组格局的稳定性。结果在NCRT前后的相应肿瘤样本中,95.2%的致癌驱动基因突变在两个样本中都能找到,而一个ATM和一个RYR1突变在NCRT后检测不到。新辅助治疗后,所有患者的TMB均有所下降。KRAS±TP53突变和TMB≥5与预后受损有关。同时,我们没有观察到治疗后TMB上升,而是下降。因此,新辅助治疗似乎不会诱发相关数量的新驱动基因突变或突变负荷。基因图谱分析意味着未来有可能支持肿瘤知情方法和预后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tumor sequencing before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: Genetic tumor characterization and clinical outcome

Background and purpose

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is a standard treatment option for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, there is still conflicting data about the genetic landscape and potential dynamics during and after NCRT. This study evaluated oncogenic driver mutations before NCRT and investigated corresponding resection samples after treatment.

Materials and methods

In 17 patients the pre-therapeutic biopsy and in ten cases the related resection specimen were investigated by next-generation sequencing using a dedicated cancer panel (708 genes). Oncogenic driver mutations and tumor mutational burden (TMB) were compared pre- and post NCRT to evaluate stability of the genomic landscape. TMB and frequently detected driver mutations were correlated with outcome parameters.

Results

In our corresponding tumor samples before and after NCRT 95.2 % of the oncogenic driver mutations could be found in both specimens whereas one ATM and one RYR1 mutation were not detectable after NCRT. TMB decreased in all patients after neoadjuvant treatment. KRAS ± TP53 mutations and TMB ≥ 5 were associated with impaired outcome.

Conclusion

Most oncogenic driver mutations investigated persisted after neoadjuvant treatment. At the same time, we did not observe ascending TMB after treatment but decline. Thus, NCRT does not seem to induce a relevant number of new driver mutations or mutational burden. Genetic profiling implies the potential to support tumor-informed approaches and outcome estimation in future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信