缩小护理差距:患者对放射治疗共同决策的需求和经验

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
A.R. van Hienen , C.J.W. Offermann , L.J. Boersma , M.J.G. Jacobs , R.R.R. Fijten
{"title":"缩小护理差距:患者对放射治疗共同决策的需求和经验","authors":"A.R. van Hienen ,&nbsp;C.J.W. Offermann ,&nbsp;L.J. Boersma ,&nbsp;M.J.G. Jacobs ,&nbsp;R.R.R. Fijten","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process in which patients and physicians jointly determine further treatment, has been associated with numerous positive effects. However, its implementation into routine clinical practice faces challenges. In radiotherapy (RT) it may have additional challenges, since patients are referred from another oncologist, often “to undergo RT”. The aim of this study is to understand patients’ preferences and experiences regarding SDM at an academic RT clinic, and to identify targets for SDM implementation in RT.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We adapted an earlier survey sent out by the Dutch Cancer Patient Organizations Federation to fit the RT setting. The survey was distributed via letters and social media to (former) patients who had their intake between 2020 and 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1799 participants completed the survey, of whom 88,3% mentioned to always or often prefer SDM. 23,1% of participants reported experiencing a choice, and 50% of these participants experienced multiple options. The most commons reason for preferring SDM was bodily autonomy (n = 1114) and against SDM was wanting to decide themselves instead (n = 11). Participants with a higher educational attainment were more likely to prefer and experience SDM. Older participants were more likely to experience multiple options.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings reaffirm that most cancer patients prefer SDM, and extend these findings to RT. However, we found a large gap between patients’ desire for SDM, and the SDM experienced in our RT institute. SDM implementation strategies are needed and should focus on overcoming RT-specific and patient-reported barriers and opportunities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 100897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy\",\"authors\":\"A.R. van Hienen ,&nbsp;C.J.W. Offermann ,&nbsp;L.J. Boersma ,&nbsp;M.J.G. Jacobs ,&nbsp;R.R.R. Fijten\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100897\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process in which patients and physicians jointly determine further treatment, has been associated with numerous positive effects. However, its implementation into routine clinical practice faces challenges. In radiotherapy (RT) it may have additional challenges, since patients are referred from another oncologist, often “to undergo RT”. The aim of this study is to understand patients’ preferences and experiences regarding SDM at an academic RT clinic, and to identify targets for SDM implementation in RT.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>We adapted an earlier survey sent out by the Dutch Cancer Patient Organizations Federation to fit the RT setting. The survey was distributed via letters and social media to (former) patients who had their intake between 2020 and 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>1799 participants completed the survey, of whom 88,3% mentioned to always or often prefer SDM. 23,1% of participants reported experiencing a choice, and 50% of these participants experienced multiple options. The most commons reason for preferring SDM was bodily autonomy (n = 1114) and against SDM was wanting to decide themselves instead (n = 11). Participants with a higher educational attainment were more likely to prefer and experience SDM. Older participants were more likely to experience multiple options.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings reaffirm that most cancer patients prefer SDM, and extend these findings to RT. However, we found a large gap between patients’ desire for SDM, and the SDM experienced in our RT institute. SDM implementation strategies are needed and should focus on overcoming RT-specific and patient-reported barriers and opportunities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"50 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100897\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001745\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824001745","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的共同决策(SDM)是患者和医生共同决定下一步治疗方案的协作过程,具有许多积极的作用。然而,将其应用于常规临床实践却面临着挑战。在放射治疗(RT)中,由于患者是由其他肿瘤医生转诊而来,通常是 "为了接受 RT 治疗",因此可能会面临更多挑战。本研究旨在了解一家学术性 RT 诊所的患者对 SDM 的偏好和体验,并确定在 RT 中实施 SDM 的目标。我们通过信件和社交媒体向 2020 年至 2022 年期间接受治疗的(前)患者发放了调查问卷。结果 1799 名参与者完成了调查,其中 88.3% 的人表示总是或经常喜欢 SDM。23.1%的参与者表示有过选择,其中50%的参与者有过多种选择。倾向于 SDM 的最常见原因是身体自主权(n = 1114),而反对 SDM 的原因是希望自己做决定(n = 11)。受教育程度较高的参与者更倾向于并经历过 SDM。结论我们的研究结果再次证实,大多数癌症患者倾向于 SDM,并将这些研究结果扩展到 RT。然而,我们发现患者对 SDM 的渴望与我们 RT 机构中的 SDM 之间存在很大差距。需要制定 SDM 实施策略,并应重点克服 RT 特有的和患者报告的障碍和机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the care gap: patients’ needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy

Background and purpose

Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process in which patients and physicians jointly determine further treatment, has been associated with numerous positive effects. However, its implementation into routine clinical practice faces challenges. In radiotherapy (RT) it may have additional challenges, since patients are referred from another oncologist, often “to undergo RT”. The aim of this study is to understand patients’ preferences and experiences regarding SDM at an academic RT clinic, and to identify targets for SDM implementation in RT.

Materials and methods

We adapted an earlier survey sent out by the Dutch Cancer Patient Organizations Federation to fit the RT setting. The survey was distributed via letters and social media to (former) patients who had their intake between 2020 and 2022.

Results

1799 participants completed the survey, of whom 88,3% mentioned to always or often prefer SDM. 23,1% of participants reported experiencing a choice, and 50% of these participants experienced multiple options. The most commons reason for preferring SDM was bodily autonomy (n = 1114) and against SDM was wanting to decide themselves instead (n = 11). Participants with a higher educational attainment were more likely to prefer and experience SDM. Older participants were more likely to experience multiple options.

Conclusion

Our findings reaffirm that most cancer patients prefer SDM, and extend these findings to RT. However, we found a large gap between patients’ desire for SDM, and the SDM experienced in our RT institute. SDM implementation strategies are needed and should focus on overcoming RT-specific and patient-reported barriers and opportunities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信