Kinesio 胶带和器械辅助软组织运动对慢性颈痛患者疼痛和运动感觉的即时影响:随机对照试验

Bayram Sonmez Unuvar PhD, PT , Hasan Gercek PT , Ayca Aytar PhD, PT , Aydan Aytar PhD, PT
{"title":"Kinesio 胶带和器械辅助软组织运动对慢性颈痛患者疼痛和运动感觉的即时影响:随机对照试验","authors":"Bayram Sonmez Unuvar PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Hasan Gercek PT ,&nbsp;Ayca Aytar PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Aydan Aytar PhD, PT","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of single-session Kinesio Tape (KT) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) interventions on pain and proprioception in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty patients with CNP aged 21 to 44 years were included in this study. The participants were divided into 2 groups as the IASTM and KT groups. The participants in the KT group took part in one session of KT application to the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, while those in the IASTM group took part in one session of IASTM application to the same muscles. The pain levels of the participants during activity were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and their cervical region proprioception levels were assessed using the Cervical Range of Motion device. Pain severity and proprioception were assessed before and after the interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No statistically significant difference was found between the pretreatment pain and proprioception values of the 2 groups (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). After the treatments, there was a significant improvement in proprioception in both groups (<em>P</em> ≤ .001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in VAS values in both groups after the treatments (<em>P</em> ≤ .001). The VAS and proprioception values of the 2 groups were not significantly different in the post-treatment measurements (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It was concluded that the IASTM and KT interventions had an immediate effect on pain and proprioception in the participants who had CNP, while neither intervention was superior to the other.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 93-101"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate Effects of Kinesio Tape and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain and Proprioception in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial\",\"authors\":\"Bayram Sonmez Unuvar PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Hasan Gercek PT ,&nbsp;Ayca Aytar PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Aydan Aytar PhD, PT\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of single-session Kinesio Tape (KT) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) interventions on pain and proprioception in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty patients with CNP aged 21 to 44 years were included in this study. The participants were divided into 2 groups as the IASTM and KT groups. The participants in the KT group took part in one session of KT application to the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, while those in the IASTM group took part in one session of IASTM application to the same muscles. The pain levels of the participants during activity were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and their cervical region proprioception levels were assessed using the Cervical Range of Motion device. Pain severity and proprioception were assessed before and after the interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No statistically significant difference was found between the pretreatment pain and proprioception values of the 2 groups (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). After the treatments, there was a significant improvement in proprioception in both groups (<em>P</em> ≤ .001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in VAS values in both groups after the treatments (<em>P</em> ≤ .001). The VAS and proprioception values of the 2 groups were not significantly different in the post-treatment measurements (<em>P</em> &gt; .05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>It was concluded that the IASTM and KT interventions had an immediate effect on pain and proprioception in the participants who had CNP, while neither intervention was superior to the other.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 93-101\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of chiropractic medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较单次 Kinesio 胶带(KT)和器械辅助软组织活动(IASTM)干预对慢性颈部疼痛(CNP)患者疼痛和本体感觉的直接影响。参与者分为两组,即 IASTM 组和 KT 组。KT 组的参与者在斜方肌和胸锁乳突肌上进行一次 KT 训练,而 IASTM 组的参与者在相同肌肉上进行一次 IASTM 训练。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)记录参与者活动时的疼痛程度,并使用颈椎活动范围装置评估他们的颈椎区域本体感觉水平。干预前后对疼痛严重程度和本体感觉进行了评估。结果 两组干预前的疼痛和本体感觉值差异无统计学意义(P> .05)。治疗后,两组患者的本体感觉均有明显改善(P ≤ .001)。同样,治疗后,两组的 VAS 值均有明显改善(P ≤ .001)。两组的 VAS 值和本体感觉值在治疗后测量中无明显差异(P > .05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Immediate Effects of Kinesio Tape and Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Pain and Proprioception in Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects of single-session Kinesio Tape (KT) and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) interventions on pain and proprioception in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP).

Methods

Forty patients with CNP aged 21 to 44 years were included in this study. The participants were divided into 2 groups as the IASTM and KT groups. The participants in the KT group took part in one session of KT application to the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles, while those in the IASTM group took part in one session of IASTM application to the same muscles. The pain levels of the participants during activity were recorded using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and their cervical region proprioception levels were assessed using the Cervical Range of Motion device. Pain severity and proprioception were assessed before and after the interventions.

Results

No statistically significant difference was found between the pretreatment pain and proprioception values of the 2 groups (P > .05). After the treatments, there was a significant improvement in proprioception in both groups (P ≤ .001). Similarly, there was a significant improvement in VAS values in both groups after the treatments (P ≤ .001). The VAS and proprioception values of the 2 groups were not significantly different in the post-treatment measurements (P > .05).

Conclusion

It was concluded that the IASTM and KT interventions had an immediate effect on pain and proprioception in the participants who had CNP, while neither intervention was superior to the other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信