Sebastian Rumpf, Nicola Zufall, Florian Rumpf, Andreas Gschwendtner
{"title":"利用亚当优化器和标签平滑法对支气管肺泡灌洗液中不同 YOLOv7 网络进行高精度细胞分类的性能比较。","authors":"Sebastian Rumpf, Nicola Zufall, Florian Rumpf, Andreas Gschwendtner","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01315-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate classification of cells in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is essential for the assessment of lung disease in pneumology and critical care medicine. However, the effectiveness of BAL fluid analysis is highly dependent on individual expertise. Our research is focused on improving the accuracy and efficiency of BAL cell classification using the \"You Only Look Once\" (YOLO) algorithm to reduce variability and increase the accuracy of cell detection in BALF analysis. We assess various YOLOv7 iterations, including YOLOv7, YOLOv7 with Adam and label smoothing, YOLOv7-E6E, and YOLOv7-E6E with Adam and label smoothing focusing on the detection of four key cell types of diagnostic importance in BAL fluid: macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils. This study utilised cytospin preparations of BAL fluid, employing May-Grunwald-Giemsa staining, and analysed a dataset comprising 2032 images with 42,221 annotations. Classification performance was evaluated using recall, precision, F1 score, mAP@.5, and mAP@.5;.95 along with a confusion matrix. The comparison of four algorithmic approaches revealed minor distinctions in mean results, falling short of statistical significance (p < 0.01; p < 0.05). YOLOv7, with an inference time of 13.5 ms for 640 × 640 px images, achieved commendable performance across all cell types, boasting an average F1 metric of 0.922, precision of 0.916, recall of 0.928, and mAP@.5 of 0.966. Remarkably, all four cell types were classified consistently with high-performance metrics. Notably, YOLOv7 demonstrated marginally superior class value dispersion when compared to YOLOv7-adam-label-smoothing, YOLOv7-E6E, and YOLOv7-E6E-adam-label-smoothing, albeit without statistical significance. Consequently, there is limited justification for deploying the more computationally intensive YOLOv7-E6E and YOLOv7-E6E-adam-label-smoothing models. This investigation indicates that the default YOLOv7 variant is the preferred choice for differential cytology due to its accessibility, lower computational demands, and overall more consistent results than more complex models.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Performance Comparison of Different YOLOv7 Networks for High-Accuracy Cell Classification in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Utilising the Adam Optimiser and Label Smoothing.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Rumpf, Nicola Zufall, Florian Rumpf, Andreas Gschwendtner\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10278-024-01315-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate classification of cells in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is essential for the assessment of lung disease in pneumology and critical care medicine. However, the effectiveness of BAL fluid analysis is highly dependent on individual expertise. Our research is focused on improving the accuracy and efficiency of BAL cell classification using the \\\"You Only Look Once\\\" (YOLO) algorithm to reduce variability and increase the accuracy of cell detection in BALF analysis. We assess various YOLOv7 iterations, including YOLOv7, YOLOv7 with Adam and label smoothing, YOLOv7-E6E, and YOLOv7-E6E with Adam and label smoothing focusing on the detection of four key cell types of diagnostic importance in BAL fluid: macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils. This study utilised cytospin preparations of BAL fluid, employing May-Grunwald-Giemsa staining, and analysed a dataset comprising 2032 images with 42,221 annotations. Classification performance was evaluated using recall, precision, F1 score, mAP@.5, and mAP@.5;.95 along with a confusion matrix. The comparison of four algorithmic approaches revealed minor distinctions in mean results, falling short of statistical significance (p < 0.01; p < 0.05). YOLOv7, with an inference time of 13.5 ms for 640 × 640 px images, achieved commendable performance across all cell types, boasting an average F1 metric of 0.922, precision of 0.916, recall of 0.928, and mAP@.5 of 0.966. Remarkably, all four cell types were classified consistently with high-performance metrics. Notably, YOLOv7 demonstrated marginally superior class value dispersion when compared to YOLOv7-adam-label-smoothing, YOLOv7-E6E, and YOLOv7-E6E-adam-label-smoothing, albeit without statistical significance. Consequently, there is limited justification for deploying the more computationally intensive YOLOv7-E6E and YOLOv7-E6E-adam-label-smoothing models. This investigation indicates that the default YOLOv7 variant is the preferred choice for differential cytology due to its accessibility, lower computational demands, and overall more consistent results than more complex models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":516858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01315-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01315-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对支气管肺泡灌洗液(BAL)中的细胞进行准确分类是肺病学和重症医学评估肺部疾病的关键。然而,BAL 液分析的有效性在很大程度上取决于个人的专业知识。我们的研究重点是利用 "只看一次"(YOLO)算法提高 BAL 细胞分类的准确性和效率,以减少变异性并提高 BALF 分析中细胞检测的准确性。我们评估了 YOLOv7 的各种迭代,包括 YOLOv7、YOLOv7(带亚当和标签平滑)、YOLOv7-E6E 和 YOLOv7-E6E(带亚当和标签平滑),重点是检测 BAL 液中具有诊断意义的四种关键细胞类型:巨噬细胞、淋巴细胞、中性粒细胞和嗜酸性粒细胞。这项研究采用 May-Grunwald-Giemsa 染色法制备 BAL 液的细胞片,并分析了由 2032 张图像和 42,221 个注释组成的数据集。使用召回率、精确度、F1 分数、mAP@.5 和 mAP@.5;.95 以及混淆矩阵评估了分类性能。对四种算法进行比较后发现,平均结果略有不同,但没有达到统计学意义上的显著性(p
A Performance Comparison of Different YOLOv7 Networks for High-Accuracy Cell Classification in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid Utilising the Adam Optimiser and Label Smoothing.
Accurate classification of cells in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid is essential for the assessment of lung disease in pneumology and critical care medicine. However, the effectiveness of BAL fluid analysis is highly dependent on individual expertise. Our research is focused on improving the accuracy and efficiency of BAL cell classification using the "You Only Look Once" (YOLO) algorithm to reduce variability and increase the accuracy of cell detection in BALF analysis. We assess various YOLOv7 iterations, including YOLOv7, YOLOv7 with Adam and label smoothing, YOLOv7-E6E, and YOLOv7-E6E with Adam and label smoothing focusing on the detection of four key cell types of diagnostic importance in BAL fluid: macrophages, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and eosinophils. This study utilised cytospin preparations of BAL fluid, employing May-Grunwald-Giemsa staining, and analysed a dataset comprising 2032 images with 42,221 annotations. Classification performance was evaluated using recall, precision, F1 score, mAP@.5, and mAP@.5;.95 along with a confusion matrix. The comparison of four algorithmic approaches revealed minor distinctions in mean results, falling short of statistical significance (p < 0.01; p < 0.05). YOLOv7, with an inference time of 13.5 ms for 640 × 640 px images, achieved commendable performance across all cell types, boasting an average F1 metric of 0.922, precision of 0.916, recall of 0.928, and mAP@.5 of 0.966. Remarkably, all four cell types were classified consistently with high-performance metrics. Notably, YOLOv7 demonstrated marginally superior class value dispersion when compared to YOLOv7-adam-label-smoothing, YOLOv7-E6E, and YOLOv7-E6E-adam-label-smoothing, albeit without statistical significance. Consequently, there is limited justification for deploying the more computationally intensive YOLOv7-E6E and YOLOv7-E6E-adam-label-smoothing models. This investigation indicates that the default YOLOv7 variant is the preferred choice for differential cytology due to its accessibility, lower computational demands, and overall more consistent results than more complex models.