在儿科使用通用知情同意服务(gICS)进行现场电子同意:创建专门设置并收集同意数据。

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2024-11-25 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000661
Katharina Danhauser, Larissa Dorothea Lina Mantoan, Jule Marie Dittmer, Simon Leutner, Stephan Endres, Karla Strniscak, Jenny Pfropfreis, Martin Bialke, Dana Stahl, Bernadette Anna Frey, Selina Sophie Gläser, Laura Aurica Ritter, Felix Linhardt, Bärbel Maag, Georgia Donata Emily Miebach, Mirjam Schäfer, Christoph Klein, Ludwig Christian Hinske
{"title":"在儿科使用通用知情同意服务(gICS)进行现场电子同意:创建专门设置并收集同意数据。","authors":"Katharina Danhauser, Larissa Dorothea Lina Mantoan, Jule Marie Dittmer, Simon Leutner, Stephan Endres, Karla Strniscak, Jenny Pfropfreis, Martin Bialke, Dana Stahl, Bernadette Anna Frey, Selina Sophie Gläser, Laura Aurica Ritter, Felix Linhardt, Bärbel Maag, Georgia Donata Emily Miebach, Mirjam Schäfer, Christoph Klein, Ludwig Christian Hinske","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enrolling in a clinical trial or study requires informed consent. Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure proper consent when storing samples in biobanks for future research, as these samples may be used in studies beyond their initial purpose. For pediatric studies, consent must be obtained from both the child and their legal guardians, requiring the recording of multiple consents at once. Electronic consent has become more popular recently due to its ability to prevent errors and simplify the documentation of multiple consents. However, integrating consent capture into existing study software structures remains a challenge. This report evaluates the usability of the generic Informed Consent Service (gICS) of the University Medicine Greifswald (UMG) for obtaining electronic consent in pediatric studies. The setup was designed to integrate seamlessly with the current infrastructure and meet the specific needs of a multi-user, multi-study environment. The study was conducted in a pediatric research setting, where additional informed consent was obtained separately for the biobank. Over a period of 54 weeks, 1061 children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years participated in the study. Out of these, 348 agreed also to participate in the biobank. The analysis included a total of 2066 consents and assents, with 945 paper-based and 1121 electronic consents. The study assessed the error susceptibility of electronic versus paper-based consents and found a significant reduction rate of errors of 94.7%. These findings provide valuable insights into the use of gICS in various studies and the practical implementation of electronic consent software in pediatric medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"3 11","pages":"e0000661"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On-site electronic consent in pediatrics using generic Informed Consent Service (gICS): Creating a specialized setup and collecting consent data.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina Danhauser, Larissa Dorothea Lina Mantoan, Jule Marie Dittmer, Simon Leutner, Stephan Endres, Karla Strniscak, Jenny Pfropfreis, Martin Bialke, Dana Stahl, Bernadette Anna Frey, Selina Sophie Gläser, Laura Aurica Ritter, Felix Linhardt, Bärbel Maag, Georgia Donata Emily Miebach, Mirjam Schäfer, Christoph Klein, Ludwig Christian Hinske\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Enrolling in a clinical trial or study requires informed consent. Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure proper consent when storing samples in biobanks for future research, as these samples may be used in studies beyond their initial purpose. For pediatric studies, consent must be obtained from both the child and their legal guardians, requiring the recording of multiple consents at once. Electronic consent has become more popular recently due to its ability to prevent errors and simplify the documentation of multiple consents. However, integrating consent capture into existing study software structures remains a challenge. This report evaluates the usability of the generic Informed Consent Service (gICS) of the University Medicine Greifswald (UMG) for obtaining electronic consent in pediatric studies. The setup was designed to integrate seamlessly with the current infrastructure and meet the specific needs of a multi-user, multi-study environment. The study was conducted in a pediatric research setting, where additional informed consent was obtained separately for the biobank. Over a period of 54 weeks, 1061 children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years participated in the study. Out of these, 348 agreed also to participate in the biobank. The analysis included a total of 2066 consents and assents, with 945 paper-based and 1121 electronic consents. The study assessed the error susceptibility of electronic versus paper-based consents and found a significant reduction rate of errors of 94.7%. These findings provide valuable insights into the use of gICS in various studies and the practical implementation of electronic consent software in pediatric medicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"3 11\",\"pages\":\"e0000661\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588232/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000661\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

参加临床试验或研究需要知情同意。此外,在生物库中储存样本供未来研究使用时,必须确保获得适当的同意,因为这些样本可能会被用于超出其初始目的的研究。对于儿科研究,必须同时获得儿童及其法定监护人的同意,这就要求同时记录多份同意书。由于电子同意书能够防止错误并简化多重同意书的记录,因此最近越来越受欢迎。然而,将同意书捕获整合到现有的研究软件结构中仍然是一项挑战。本报告评估了格赖夫斯瓦尔德大学医学院(UMG)通用知情同意服务(gICS)在儿科研究中获取电子同意书的可用性。该设置旨在与当前的基础设施无缝集成,并满足多用户、多研究环境的特定需求。这项研究是在儿科研究环境中进行的,另外还为生物库单独获得了知情同意。在为期 54 周的时间里,共有 1061 名 3 至 17 岁的儿童和青少年参与了这项研究。其中,348 人还同意参加生物库。分析共包括 2066 份同意书和同意书,其中纸质同意书 945 份,电子同意书 1121 份。研究评估了电子同意书与纸质同意书的出错率,发现电子同意书的出错率显著降低了 94.7%。这些发现为 gICS 在各种研究中的使用以及电子同意书软件在儿科医学中的实际应用提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On-site electronic consent in pediatrics using generic Informed Consent Service (gICS): Creating a specialized setup and collecting consent data.

Enrolling in a clinical trial or study requires informed consent. Furthermore, it is crucial to ensure proper consent when storing samples in biobanks for future research, as these samples may be used in studies beyond their initial purpose. For pediatric studies, consent must be obtained from both the child and their legal guardians, requiring the recording of multiple consents at once. Electronic consent has become more popular recently due to its ability to prevent errors and simplify the documentation of multiple consents. However, integrating consent capture into existing study software structures remains a challenge. This report evaluates the usability of the generic Informed Consent Service (gICS) of the University Medicine Greifswald (UMG) for obtaining electronic consent in pediatric studies. The setup was designed to integrate seamlessly with the current infrastructure and meet the specific needs of a multi-user, multi-study environment. The study was conducted in a pediatric research setting, where additional informed consent was obtained separately for the biobank. Over a period of 54 weeks, 1061 children and adolescents aged 3 to 17 years participated in the study. Out of these, 348 agreed also to participate in the biobank. The analysis included a total of 2066 consents and assents, with 945 paper-based and 1121 electronic consents. The study assessed the error susceptibility of electronic versus paper-based consents and found a significant reduction rate of errors of 94.7%. These findings provide valuable insights into the use of gICS in various studies and the practical implementation of electronic consent software in pediatric medicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信