入学面试中的模拟:申请者的经验和课程成绩预测 模拟入学面试:申请者的经验和课程成绩预测。

Canadian medical education journal Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.36834/cmej.78961
Anne Wildermuth, Alexis Battista, LaKesha N Anderson
{"title":"入学面试中的模拟:申请者的经验和课程成绩预测 模拟入学面试:申请者的经验和课程成绩预测。","authors":"Anne Wildermuth, Alexis Battista, LaKesha N Anderson","doi":"10.36834/cmej.78961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Admissions interviews are frequently used to assess personal and interpersonal attributes required for successful medical practice. Using simulation in interviews to engage applicants in realistic medical scenarios to assess these attributes is novel. This study evaluates applicant perceptions of simulation within multiple mini-interviews (MMI) and reports on subsequent student program performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Physician assistant (PA) program applicants were invited to complete an anonymous post-interview survey that included one free-response question about their admissions experience. We chose to qualitatively analyze the free-response question. Additionally, success metrics of students who experienced simulation-based MMI were compared to prior cohorts who were admitted using traditional interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applicants undergoing simulation-based interviews in MMI had decreased incidences of major professionalism events, greater on-time program progression, and similar board pass rates compared to applicants who experienced traditional interviews. Several themes, highlighting the applicants' varied responses to the simulation-based MMI, emerged including showcasing strengths and passion, feelings of fairness, accessing program faculty, and impacts on certainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of simulation in admissions interviews is a valuable tool for assessing an applicant's personal attributes in a clinical setting. Applicants admitted using simulation had improved programmatic performance compared to applicants admitted using traditional interviews. Applicants' perceptions of simulation in interviews are helpful when designing the admissions experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"15 5","pages":"45-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation in admissions interviews: applicant experiences and programmatic performance prediction Simulation dans les entrevues d'admission : expériences des candidats et prédiction du rendement au sein des programmes de formation.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Wildermuth, Alexis Battista, LaKesha N Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.36834/cmej.78961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Admissions interviews are frequently used to assess personal and interpersonal attributes required for successful medical practice. Using simulation in interviews to engage applicants in realistic medical scenarios to assess these attributes is novel. This study evaluates applicant perceptions of simulation within multiple mini-interviews (MMI) and reports on subsequent student program performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Physician assistant (PA) program applicants were invited to complete an anonymous post-interview survey that included one free-response question about their admissions experience. We chose to qualitatively analyze the free-response question. Additionally, success metrics of students who experienced simulation-based MMI were compared to prior cohorts who were admitted using traditional interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applicants undergoing simulation-based interviews in MMI had decreased incidences of major professionalism events, greater on-time program progression, and similar board pass rates compared to applicants who experienced traditional interviews. Several themes, highlighting the applicants' varied responses to the simulation-based MMI, emerged including showcasing strengths and passion, feelings of fairness, accessing program faculty, and impacts on certainty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of simulation in admissions interviews is a valuable tool for assessing an applicant's personal attributes in a clinical setting. Applicants admitted using simulation had improved programmatic performance compared to applicants admitted using traditional interviews. Applicants' perceptions of simulation in interviews are helpful when designing the admissions experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"volume\":\"15 5\",\"pages\":\"45-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586025/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian medical education journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.78961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:入学面试经常被用来评估成功行医所需的个人和人际关系特质。在面试中使用模拟,让申请者参与到真实的医疗场景中来评估这些特质是一项创新。本研究评估了申请者对多次小型面试(MMI)中模拟的看法,并报告了学生随后的课程表现:方法:邀请医生助理(PA)课程申请者完成匿名面试后调查,其中包括一个关于他们入学经历的自由回答问题。我们选择对自由回答问题进行定性分析。此外,我们还将经历过模拟 MMI 的学生的成功指标与之前通过传统面试录取的学生进行了比较:结果:与经历过传统面试的申请者相比,经历过模拟 MMI 面试的申请者发生重大职业事件的几率更低,按时完成课程的几率更高,考试通过率相似。有几个主题突出了申请人对模拟 MMI 的不同反应,包括展示优势和激情、公平感、接触项目教师以及对确定性的影响:结论:在入学面试中使用模拟面试是在临床环境中评估申请人个人特质的重要工具。与采用传统面试方式录取的申请人相比,采用模拟面试方式录取的申请人的课程成绩有所提高。申请人对模拟面试的看法有助于设计录取体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation in admissions interviews: applicant experiences and programmatic performance prediction Simulation dans les entrevues d'admission : expériences des candidats et prédiction du rendement au sein des programmes de formation.

Background: Admissions interviews are frequently used to assess personal and interpersonal attributes required for successful medical practice. Using simulation in interviews to engage applicants in realistic medical scenarios to assess these attributes is novel. This study evaluates applicant perceptions of simulation within multiple mini-interviews (MMI) and reports on subsequent student program performance.

Methods: Physician assistant (PA) program applicants were invited to complete an anonymous post-interview survey that included one free-response question about their admissions experience. We chose to qualitatively analyze the free-response question. Additionally, success metrics of students who experienced simulation-based MMI were compared to prior cohorts who were admitted using traditional interviews.

Results: Applicants undergoing simulation-based interviews in MMI had decreased incidences of major professionalism events, greater on-time program progression, and similar board pass rates compared to applicants who experienced traditional interviews. Several themes, highlighting the applicants' varied responses to the simulation-based MMI, emerged including showcasing strengths and passion, feelings of fairness, accessing program faculty, and impacts on certainty.

Conclusions: The use of simulation in admissions interviews is a valuable tool for assessing an applicant's personal attributes in a clinical setting. Applicants admitted using simulation had improved programmatic performance compared to applicants admitted using traditional interviews. Applicants' perceptions of simulation in interviews are helpful when designing the admissions experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信