评估工作量和临床医师经验对病人吞吐量的影响:一项多中心研究。

Marisha Burden, Venkat P Gundareddy, Regina Kauffman, Joseph Walker Keach, Lauren McBeth, Katie E Raffel, John D Rice, Catherine Washburn, Flora Kisuule, Angela Keniston
{"title":"评估工作量和临床医师经验对病人吞吐量的影响:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Marisha Burden, Venkat P Gundareddy, Regina Kauffman, Joseph Walker Keach, Lauren McBeth, Katie E Raffel, John D Rice, Catherine Washburn, Flora Kisuule, Angela Keniston","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various strategies have attempted to address increased patient lengths of stay (LOS), but effectiveness varies. Factors related to work design and workforce experience may also play significant roles.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Utilizing data from the Discharge in the A.M. trial, we aimed to validate an electronic measure of workload (i.e., note count) and assess the relationship of workload, patient complexity, and physician years of experience to LOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study at three large academic hospitals with hospital medicine physicians and patients they care for during the study.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Workload as measured by electronic note count and physician years of experience; patient LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 9, 2021 to July 31, 2021, 59 physicians completed daily surveys for 93% of 2318 scheduled shifts. We observed a moderate correlation (r: .56) between starting morning census and note counts but no association with LOS. We observed an effect modification between note count and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), with LOS increasing by 2.3% (95% CI: 0.3%, 4.3%; p = .02) and 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0%, 5.9%; p < .0001) per patient for every 1 unit increase in note count for patients with a moderate CCI or severe CCI, respectively. Years since training was associated with a 0.7% decrease in LOS (95% CI: -1.3%, -0.1%, p = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician workload, as measured by note count, was associated with longer LOS with higher CCI, while more years of experience was associated with shorter LOS. Original Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05370638.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Marisha Burden, Venkat P Gundareddy, Regina Kauffman, Joseph Walker Keach, Lauren McBeth, Katie E Raffel, John D Rice, Catherine Washburn, Flora Kisuule, Angela Keniston\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.13555\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various strategies have attempted to address increased patient lengths of stay (LOS), but effectiveness varies. Factors related to work design and workforce experience may also play significant roles.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Utilizing data from the Discharge in the A.M. trial, we aimed to validate an electronic measure of workload (i.e., note count) and assess the relationship of workload, patient complexity, and physician years of experience to LOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective observational study at three large academic hospitals with hospital medicine physicians and patients they care for during the study.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Workload as measured by electronic note count and physician years of experience; patient LOS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From February 9, 2021 to July 31, 2021, 59 physicians completed daily surveys for 93% of 2318 scheduled shifts. We observed a moderate correlation (r: .56) between starting morning census and note counts but no association with LOS. We observed an effect modification between note count and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), with LOS increasing by 2.3% (95% CI: 0.3%, 4.3%; p = .02) and 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0%, 5.9%; p < .0001) per patient for every 1 unit increase in note count for patients with a moderate CCI or severe CCI, respectively. Years since training was associated with a 0.7% decrease in LOS (95% CI: -1.3%, -0.1%, p = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physician workload, as measured by note count, was associated with longer LOS with higher CCI, while more years of experience was associated with shorter LOS. Original Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05370638.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13555\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为解决患者住院时间(LOS)延长的问题,人们尝试了各种策略,但效果不一。与工作设计和员工经验相关的因素也可能起到重要作用:利用 "上午出院 "试验的数据,我们旨在验证工作量的电子测量方法(即纸条计数),并评估工作量、患者复杂程度和医生工作年限与住院时间的关系:在三家大型学术医院对医院内科医生和他们在研究期间护理的病人进行回顾性观察研究:结果:从 2021 年 2 月 9 日到 7 月 31 日,医院内科医师的工作量和工作年限与患者的生命周期密切相关:从 2021 年 2 月 9 日至 2021 年 7 月 31 日,59 名医生完成了 2318 个排班中 93% 的每日调查。我们观察到,早上开始的人口普查与纸条数量之间存在中度相关性(r:.56),但与 LOS 无关。我们观察到纸条数量和夏尔森综合症指数(CCI)之间存在效应修正,LOS 增加了 2.3% (95% CI: 0.3%, 4.3%; p = .02) 和 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0%, 5.9%; p 结论:纸条数量和夏尔森综合症指数(CCI)之间存在效应修正:以病历条数衡量的医生工作量与较高 CCI 的较长 LOS 相关,而较长的工作年限与较短的 LOS 相关。原始临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT05370638。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the impact of workload and clinician experience on patient throughput: A multicenter study.

Background: Various strategies have attempted to address increased patient lengths of stay (LOS), but effectiveness varies. Factors related to work design and workforce experience may also play significant roles.

Objective: Utilizing data from the Discharge in the A.M. trial, we aimed to validate an electronic measure of workload (i.e., note count) and assess the relationship of workload, patient complexity, and physician years of experience to LOS.

Methods: Retrospective observational study at three large academic hospitals with hospital medicine physicians and patients they care for during the study.

Measures: Workload as measured by electronic note count and physician years of experience; patient LOS.

Results: From February 9, 2021 to July 31, 2021, 59 physicians completed daily surveys for 93% of 2318 scheduled shifts. We observed a moderate correlation (r: .56) between starting morning census and note counts but no association with LOS. We observed an effect modification between note count and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), with LOS increasing by 2.3% (95% CI: 0.3%, 4.3%; p = .02) and 3.9% (95% CI: 2.0%, 5.9%; p < .0001) per patient for every 1 unit increase in note count for patients with a moderate CCI or severe CCI, respectively. Years since training was associated with a 0.7% decrease in LOS (95% CI: -1.3%, -0.1%, p = .03).

Conclusion: Physician workload, as measured by note count, was associated with longer LOS with higher CCI, while more years of experience was associated with shorter LOS. Original Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05370638.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信