基于畸形学的小儿先天性心脏病遗传疾病筛查结果支持更广泛的基因检测。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Benjamin M Helm, Lindsey R Helvaty, Erin Conboy, Gabrielle C Geddes, Brett H Graham, Melissa Lah, Leah Wetherill, Benjamin J Landis, Stephanie M Ware
{"title":"基于畸形学的小儿先天性心脏病遗传疾病筛查结果支持更广泛的基因检测。","authors":"Benjamin M Helm, Lindsey R Helvaty, Erin Conboy, Gabrielle C Geddes, Brett H Graham, Melissa Lah, Leah Wetherill, Benjamin J Landis, Stephanie M Ware","doi":"10.1002/mgg3.70040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysmorphology evaluation is important for congenital heart disease (CHD) assessment, but there are no prior investigations quantifying the screening performance compared to standardized genetics evaluations. We investigated this through systematic dysmorphology assessment in CHD patients with standardized genetic testing in primarily pediatric patients with CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dysmorphology evaluations preceding genetic testing results allowed us to test for associations between dysmorphic status and genetic diagnoses while adjusting for extracardiac anomalies (ECAs). We use a test-negative case-control design on a pediatric inpatient CHD cohort for our study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 568 patients, nearly 96% of patients completed genetic testing, primarily chromosome microarray (CMA) ± exome sequencing-based genetic testing (493/568, 86.8%). Overall, 115 patients (20.2%) were found to have genetic diagnoses, and dysmorphic patients had doubled risk of genetic diagnoses, after ECA adjustment (OR = 2.10, p = 0.0030). We found that 7.9% (14/178) of ECA-/nondysmorphic patients had genetic diagnoses, which increased to 13.5% (26/192) in the ECA-/dysmorphic patients. Nearly 43% of ECA+/dysmorphic patients had genetic diagnoses (63/147). The positive predictive value of dysmorphic status was only 26.3%, and the negative predictive value of nondysmorphic status was 88.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dysmorphology-based prediction of genetic disorders is limited because of diagnoses found in apparently isolated CHD. Our findings represent one of the only assessments of phenotype-based screening for genetic disorders in CHD and should inform clinical genetics evaluation practices for pediatric CHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":18852,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"e70040"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of Dysmorphology-Based Screening for Genetic Disorders in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease Supports Wider Genetic Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin M Helm, Lindsey R Helvaty, Erin Conboy, Gabrielle C Geddes, Brett H Graham, Melissa Lah, Leah Wetherill, Benjamin J Landis, Stephanie M Ware\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mgg3.70040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysmorphology evaluation is important for congenital heart disease (CHD) assessment, but there are no prior investigations quantifying the screening performance compared to standardized genetics evaluations. We investigated this through systematic dysmorphology assessment in CHD patients with standardized genetic testing in primarily pediatric patients with CHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dysmorphology evaluations preceding genetic testing results allowed us to test for associations between dysmorphic status and genetic diagnoses while adjusting for extracardiac anomalies (ECAs). We use a test-negative case-control design on a pediatric inpatient CHD cohort for our study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 568 patients, nearly 96% of patients completed genetic testing, primarily chromosome microarray (CMA) ± exome sequencing-based genetic testing (493/568, 86.8%). Overall, 115 patients (20.2%) were found to have genetic diagnoses, and dysmorphic patients had doubled risk of genetic diagnoses, after ECA adjustment (OR = 2.10, p = 0.0030). We found that 7.9% (14/178) of ECA-/nondysmorphic patients had genetic diagnoses, which increased to 13.5% (26/192) in the ECA-/dysmorphic patients. Nearly 43% of ECA+/dysmorphic patients had genetic diagnoses (63/147). The positive predictive value of dysmorphic status was only 26.3%, and the negative predictive value of nondysmorphic status was 88.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dysmorphology-based prediction of genetic disorders is limited because of diagnoses found in apparently isolated CHD. Our findings represent one of the only assessments of phenotype-based screening for genetic disorders in CHD and should inform clinical genetics evaluation practices for pediatric CHD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 11\",\"pages\":\"e70040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70040\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.70040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:畸形评估对于先天性心脏病(CHD)评估非常重要,但与标准化遗传学评估相比,目前还没有对筛查性能进行量化的研究。我们通过对先天性心脏病(CHD)患者进行系统的畸形评估,并主要对儿科先天性心脏病(CHD)患者进行标准化遗传学检测,对这一问题进行了研究:方法:在基因检测结果出来之前进行畸形评估,可以检验畸形状态与基因诊断之间的关联,同时调整心外异常(ECA)。我们在一项儿科先天性心脏病住院病人队列研究中采用了检测阴性病例对照设计:在 568 名患者中,近 96% 的患者完成了基因检测,主要是基于染色体微阵列(CMA)和外显子组测序的基因检测(493/568,86.8%)。总体而言,115 名患者(20.2%)被发现有基因诊断,经 ECA 调整后,畸形患者的基因诊断风险增加了一倍(OR = 2.10,P = 0.0030)。我们发现,7.9%(14/178)的 ECA-/ 非畸形患者有基因诊断,而在 ECA-/dysmorphic 患者中,这一比例上升到 13.5%(26/192)。近 43% 的 ECA+/畸形患者有基因诊断结果(63/147)。畸形状态的阳性预测值仅为 26.3%,而非畸形状态的阴性预测值为 88.7%:结论:基于畸形的遗传疾病预测是有限的,因为在明显孤立的先天性心脏病中发现的诊断。我们的研究结果是对基于表型的CHD遗传病筛查的唯一评估之一,应为儿科CHD的临床遗传学评估实践提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance of Dysmorphology-Based Screening for Genetic Disorders in Pediatric Congenital Heart Disease Supports Wider Genetic Testing.

Background: Dysmorphology evaluation is important for congenital heart disease (CHD) assessment, but there are no prior investigations quantifying the screening performance compared to standardized genetics evaluations. We investigated this through systematic dysmorphology assessment in CHD patients with standardized genetic testing in primarily pediatric patients with CHD.

Methods: Dysmorphology evaluations preceding genetic testing results allowed us to test for associations between dysmorphic status and genetic diagnoses while adjusting for extracardiac anomalies (ECAs). We use a test-negative case-control design on a pediatric inpatient CHD cohort for our study.

Results: Of 568 patients, nearly 96% of patients completed genetic testing, primarily chromosome microarray (CMA) ± exome sequencing-based genetic testing (493/568, 86.8%). Overall, 115 patients (20.2%) were found to have genetic diagnoses, and dysmorphic patients had doubled risk of genetic diagnoses, after ECA adjustment (OR = 2.10, p = 0.0030). We found that 7.9% (14/178) of ECA-/nondysmorphic patients had genetic diagnoses, which increased to 13.5% (26/192) in the ECA-/dysmorphic patients. Nearly 43% of ECA+/dysmorphic patients had genetic diagnoses (63/147). The positive predictive value of dysmorphic status was only 26.3%, and the negative predictive value of nondysmorphic status was 88.7%.

Conclusions: Dysmorphology-based prediction of genetic disorders is limited because of diagnoses found in apparently isolated CHD. Our findings represent one of the only assessments of phenotype-based screening for genetic disorders in CHD and should inform clinical genetics evaluation practices for pediatric CHD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of quality research related to the dynamically developing areas of human, molecular and medical genetics. The journal publishes original research articles covering findings in phenotypic, molecular, biological, and genomic aspects of genomic variation, inherited disorders and birth defects. The broad publishing spectrum of Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine includes rare and common disorders from diagnosis to treatment. Examples of appropriate articles include reports of novel disease genes, functional studies of genetic variants, in-depth genotype-phenotype studies, genomic analysis of inherited disorders, molecular diagnostic methods, medical bioinformatics, ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI), and approaches to clinical diagnosis. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine provides a scientific home for next generation sequencing studies of rare and common disorders, which will make research in this fascinating area easily and rapidly accessible to the scientific community. This will serve as the basis for translating next generation sequencing studies into individualized diagnostics and therapeutics, for day-to-day medical care. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine publishes original research articles, reviews, and research methods papers, along with invited editorials and commentaries. Original research papers must report well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信